Comparing Models of the Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS) in an Italian Clinical Sample.

Bayesian model comparison Children’s Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS) Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder TIC Disorder Tourette Syndrome

Journal

Frontiers in psychiatry
ISSN: 1664-0640
Titre abrégé: Front Psychiatry
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101545006

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 30 01 2020
accepted: 12 06 2020
entrez: 28 8 2020
pubmed: 28 8 2020
medline: 28 8 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) is a mental disorder that interferes with daily functioning and may arise during childhood. The current study is the first attempt by Italian researchers to validate the Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS). The study's primary aim was to investigate the best CY-BOCS model fit, adopting a Bayesian model comparison strategy, among four different factor models: a one-factor model; a two-factor model based on Obsessions and Compulsions; Storch et al.'s and Mc Kay et al.'s two-factor model based on Disturbance and Severity. The study also aimed to investigate the types of treatments found in a sample of Italian OCD children patients. The study sample was made up of 53 children with OCD and 14 children with Tourette Syndrome and TIC. An analysis of our data demonstrated that the Obsessions and Compulsions model was the most plausible one, as it demonstrated the best fit indices, strong convergent validity, and good reliability. The study results additionally uncovered that 24.5% of the children in the OCD sample had not yet begun any treatment pathway a year after a diagnosis was formulated. These findings suggest that the Obsessions and Compulsions scales of the CY-BOCS separately represent appropriate instruments to evaluate children with OCD.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) is a mental disorder that interferes with daily functioning and may arise during childhood. The current study is the first attempt by Italian researchers to validate the Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS).
AIMS OBJECTIVE
The study's primary aim was to investigate the best CY-BOCS model fit, adopting a Bayesian model comparison strategy, among four different factor models: a one-factor model; a two-factor model based on Obsessions and Compulsions; Storch et al.'s and Mc Kay et al.'s two-factor model based on Disturbance and Severity. The study also aimed to investigate the types of treatments found in a sample of Italian OCD children patients.
METHODS METHODS
The study sample was made up of 53 children with OCD and 14 children with Tourette Syndrome and TIC.
RESULTS RESULTS
An analysis of our data demonstrated that the Obsessions and Compulsions model was the most plausible one, as it demonstrated the best fit indices, strong convergent validity, and good reliability. The study results additionally uncovered that 24.5% of the children in the OCD sample had not yet begun any treatment pathway a year after a diagnosis was formulated.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
These findings suggest that the Obsessions and Compulsions scales of the CY-BOCS separately represent appropriate instruments to evaluate children with OCD.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32848897
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00615
pmc: PMC7424057
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

615

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Novara, Pardini, Cardona and Pastore.

Références

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006 Jan;160(1):65-9
pubmed: 16389213
J Child Neurol. 2006 Aug;21(8):642-9
pubmed: 16970864
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1989 Apr;46(4):335-41
pubmed: 2930330
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Feb;25(1):207-218
pubmed: 28353065
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Feb;25(1):178-206
pubmed: 28176294
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011 Mar;108(11):173-9
pubmed: 21475565
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2004 Jul;110(1):4-13
pubmed: 15180774
J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2009 Jun;31(2):104-111
pubmed: 20198131
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2005 Jun;34(2):312-9
pubmed: 15901231
Behav Ther. 2010 Mar;41(1):121-32
pubmed: 20171333
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1996 Dec;35(12):1637-46
pubmed: 8973071
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2005 May;14(3):164-73
pubmed: 15959662
Psychol Methods. 2012 Sep;17(3):313-35
pubmed: 22962886
Psychol Methods. 2017 Jun;22(2):217-239
pubmed: 28594224
Depress Anxiety. 2005;22(1):28-35
pubmed: 16130118
Child Dev. 2014 May-Jun;85(3):842-860
pubmed: 24116396
Arch Dis Child. 2015 May;100(5):495-9
pubmed: 25398447
Am J Psychiatry. 2001 Jul;158(7):1067-74
pubmed: 11431228
Psychol Assess. 2003 Dec;15(4):578-81
pubmed: 14692851
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2006 Jun;29(2):353-70
pubmed: 16650713
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2017 Jun;31(3):291-295
pubmed: 28499570
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011 May;6(3):274-90
pubmed: 26168518
Psychiatry Res. 2008 Mar 15;158(2):217-25
pubmed: 18237785
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Jan;145(1):56-81
pubmed: 26709589
Psychol Assess. 2010 Jun;22(2):223-32
pubmed: 20528050
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1992 Nov;31(6):1050-6
pubmed: 1429404
Am J Psychiatry. 1996 Jun;153(6):783-8
pubmed: 8633690
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Feb;25(1):219-234
pubmed: 28660424
Behav Res Ther. 1995 Sep;33(7):865-9
pubmed: 7677726
Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Feb;11(1):192-6
pubmed: 15117008
J Anxiety Disord. 2000 Nov-Dec;14(6):535-48
pubmed: 11918090
Expert Rev Neurother. 2012 Feb;12(2):229-38
pubmed: 22288678
Clin Psychol Rev. 2001 Feb;21(1):137-57
pubmed: 11148894
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Mar;261:50-60
pubmed: 29287236
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2013 Feb;44(1):137-51
pubmed: 22711294
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2011 Aug;39(6):877-83
pubmed: 21340599
Br J Psychiatry. 2001 Oct;179:324-9
pubmed: 11581112
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2003;13 Suppl 1:S61-9
pubmed: 12880501
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1998 Apr;37(4):420-7
pubmed: 9549963
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1997 Jun;36(6):844-52
pubmed: 9183141
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2002 Sep-Dec;33(3-4):159-76
pubmed: 12628634
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1995 Nov;34(11):1424-31
pubmed: 8543509
Mol Psychiatry. 2010 Jan;15(1):53-63
pubmed: 18725912

Auteurs

Caterina Novara (C)

Dipartimento di Psicologia Generale, Università di Padova, Padova, Italy.

Susanna Pardini (S)

Dipartimento di Psicologia Generale, Università di Padova, Padova, Italy.

Francesco Cardona (F)

Dipartimento di Neuroscienze Umane, Università di Roma "La Sapienza", Roma, Italy.

Massimiliano Pastore (M)

Dipartimento di Psicologia dello Sviluppo e della Socializzazione, Università di Padova, Padova, Italy.

Classifications MeSH