Old Practice, but Young Research Field: A Systematic Bibliographic Review of Personal Branding.

bibliographical analysis human brand literature review personal brand personal branding

Journal

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 06 05 2020
accepted: 30 06 2020
entrez: 28 8 2020
pubmed: 28 8 2020
medline: 28 8 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Before engaging with the already intensive and still increasing personal branding activities in many fields of practice, a scholarly approach would call for a more specific definition of the concept of personal branding processes and the resulting human brands. A multi-step analysis of the growing body of literature on personal branding is employed, integrating a framework that covers six key research streams of personal branding, (1) terminology and definition, (2) underlying theories, (3) classes and categories, (4) benefits, (5) antecedents, and (6) key ingredients and applications, complemented by challenges the domain of personal branding has to cope with. The analysis shows that personal branding is an interdisciplinary concern, which is still in its infancy and in which universally valid personal branding frameworks or even theories cannot be identified yet. Personal branding appears as a source for new academic impulses, as it may sensitize scholars to opportunities for intensifying collaboration with practitioners and with other academic domains to enrich and disseminate knowledge in their fields.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32849068
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01809
pmc: PMC7433337
doi:

Types de publication

Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

1809

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Scheidt, Gelhard and Henseler.

Références

Harv Bus Rev. 2010 Nov;88(11):127-30, 151
pubmed: 21049685
Res Synth Methods. 2015 Mar;6(1):87-95
pubmed: 26035472
Med Ref Serv Q. 2015;34(2):181-9
pubmed: 25927510
Int J Nurs Stud. 2008 Jan;45(1):140-53
pubmed: 17383655
Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):68-78
pubmed: 11392867
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987 Apr;52(4):663-76
pubmed: 3572732
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 21;9:2238
pubmed: 30519202
J Mark. 1969 Jan;33(1):10-5
pubmed: 12309673
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 Jun;70(6):1185-204
pubmed: 8667162
Am Psychol. 2006 Apr;61(3):204-17
pubmed: 16594837
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993 May;64(5):834-46
pubmed: 8505712
Harv Bus Rev. 2002 Sep;80(9):80-6, 125
pubmed: 12227148
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Apr;54(4):616-28
pubmed: 3367282
Front Psychol. 2019 Dec 09;10:2662
pubmed: 31920774
Healthc Exec. 2012 Jan-Feb;27(1):70, 72-3
pubmed: 22313014

Auteurs

Stefan Scheidt (S)

Chair of Product-Market Relations, Department of Design, Production and Management, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.

Carsten Gelhard (C)

Chair of Product-Market Relations, Department of Design, Production and Management, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.

Jörg Henseler (J)

Chair of Product-Market Relations, Department of Design, Production and Management, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.
Nova Information Management School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.

Classifications MeSH