Clinical and Radiological Outcomes after Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Lisfranc Injuries: A Single Centre Experience.
Clinical outcomes
dorsal bridging plate
joint preserving surgery
lisfranc injury
open reduction and internal fixation
radiological outcome
results
single-center study
Journal
Indian journal of orthopaedics
ISSN: 0019-5413
Titre abrégé: Indian J Orthop
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 0137736
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2020
Sep 2020
Historique:
entrez:
28
8
2020
pubmed:
28
8
2020
medline:
28
8
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Lisfranc injuries are uncommon and can be challenging to manage. There is considerable variation in opinion regarding the mode of operative treatment of these injuries, with some studies preferring primary arthrodesis over traditional open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). We aim to assess the clinical and radiological outcomes of the patients treated with ORIF in our unit. This is a retrospective study, in which all 27 consecutive patients treated with ORIF between June 2013 and October 2018 by one surgeon were included with an average followup of 2.4 years. All patients underwent ORIF with joint-sparing surgery by a dorsal bridging plate (DBP) for the second and third tarsometatarsal (TMT) joint, and the first TMT joint was fixed with transarticular screws. Patients had clinical examination and radiological assessment and completed American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) midfoot score and Foot Function Index (FFI) questionnaires. Our early results of 22 patients (5 lost to followup) showed that 16 (72%) patients were pain free, walking normally without aids, and wearing normal shoes and 68% were able to run or play sports. The mean AOFAS midfoot score was 78.1 (63-100) and the average FFI was 19.5 (0.6-34). Radiological assessment confirmed that only three patients had progression to posttraumatic arthritis at the TMT joints though only one of these was clinically symptomatic. Good clinical and radiological outcomes can be achieved by ORIF in lisfranc injuries with joint-sparing surgery using DBP.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Lisfranc injuries are uncommon and can be challenging to manage. There is considerable variation in opinion regarding the mode of operative treatment of these injuries, with some studies preferring primary arthrodesis over traditional open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). We aim to assess the clinical and radiological outcomes of the patients treated with ORIF in our unit.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
METHODS
This is a retrospective study, in which all 27 consecutive patients treated with ORIF between June 2013 and October 2018 by one surgeon were included with an average followup of 2.4 years. All patients underwent ORIF with joint-sparing surgery by a dorsal bridging plate (DBP) for the second and third tarsometatarsal (TMT) joint, and the first TMT joint was fixed with transarticular screws. Patients had clinical examination and radiological assessment and completed American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) midfoot score and Foot Function Index (FFI) questionnaires.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Our early results of 22 patients (5 lost to followup) showed that 16 (72%) patients were pain free, walking normally without aids, and wearing normal shoes and 68% were able to run or play sports. The mean AOFAS midfoot score was 78.1 (63-100) and the average FFI was 19.5 (0.6-34). Radiological assessment confirmed that only three patients had progression to posttraumatic arthritis at the TMT joints though only one of these was clinically symptomatic.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Good clinical and radiological outcomes can be achieved by ORIF in lisfranc injuries with joint-sparing surgery using DBP.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32850021
doi: 10.1007/s43465-020-00066-x
pii: 66
pmc: PMC7429666
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
587-593Informations de copyright
© Indian Orthopaedics Association 2020.
Références
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jun;474(6):1445-52
pubmed: 26022112
Acta Ortop Bras. 2014;22(6):315-20
pubmed: 25538478
Orthop Clin North Am. 1989 Oct;20(4):655-64
pubmed: 2797755
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 May 4;98(9):713-20
pubmed: 27147683
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Mar;88(3):514-20
pubmed: 16510816
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 Sep;78(9):1376-85
pubmed: 8816654
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1964 Nov;46:700-4
pubmed: 14251452
Foot Ankle Int. 2005 Jun;26(6):462-73
pubmed: 15960913
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1963 Mar;45-A:246-60
pubmed: 14040742
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2012 Aug;20(2):170-5
pubmed: 22933673
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000 Nov;82(11):1609-18
pubmed: 11097452
Foot Ankle Int. 2012 Jan;33(1):50-6
pubmed: 22381236
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988 Feb;70(2):173-81
pubmed: 3273882
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 1995 Feb;Suppl:7-16
pubmed: 7613974
Am J Sports Med. 1993 Jul-Aug;21(4):497-502
pubmed: 8368407
J Trauma. 2009 Apr;66(4):1125-8
pubmed: 19359924
Foot Ankle Int. 2006 Aug;27(8):653-60
pubmed: 16919225
Foot Ankle. 1986 Apr;6(5):225-42
pubmed: 3710321
Foot Ankle. 1990 Feb;10(4):193-200
pubmed: 2307374
Foot Ankle. 1986 Apr;6(5):243-53
pubmed: 3710322
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2003 Jul-Aug;11(4):260-7
pubmed: 12889864
Int Orthop. 2010 Dec;34(8):1083-91
pubmed: 20683593
Bone Joint J. 2018 Apr 1;100-B(4):468-474
pubmed: 29629578
Foot Ankle Int. 2009 Oct;30(10):913-22
pubmed: 19796583