Easing the Monte Carlo sign problem.


Journal

Science advances
ISSN: 2375-2548
Titre abrégé: Sci Adv
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101653440

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2020
Historique:
received: 27 03 2020
accepted: 01 07 2020
entrez: 28 8 2020
pubmed: 28 8 2020
medline: 28 8 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) methods are the gold standard for studying equilibrium properties of quantum many-body systems. However, in many interesting situations, QMC methods are faced with a sign problem, causing the severe limitation of an exponential increase in the runtime of the QMC algorithm. In this work, we develop a systematic, generally applicable, and practically feasible methodology for easing the sign problem by efficiently computable basis changes and use it to rigorously assess the sign problem. Our framework introduces measures of non-stoquasticity that-as we demonstrate analytically and numerically-at the same time provide a practically relevant and efficiently computable figure of merit for the severity of the sign problem. Complementing this pragmatic mindset, we prove that easing the sign problem in terms of those measures is generally an NP-complete task for nearest-neighbor Hamiltonians and simple basis choices by a reduction to the MAXCUT-problem.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32851184
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abb8341
pii: abb8341
pmc: PMC7428338
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

eabb8341

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC).

Références

J Chem Theory Comput. 2015 Nov 10;11(11):5316-25
pubmed: 26894240
Phys Rev E. 2019 Mar;99(3-1):033306
pubmed: 30999420
Phys Rev Lett. 2005 May 6;94(17):170201
pubmed: 15904269
Phys Rev Lett. 1995 Dec 11;75(24):4524-4527
pubmed: 10059930
Sci Adv. 2017 Sep 27;3(9):e1701758
pubmed: 28959729
Nat Commun. 2015 Jun 22;6:7421
pubmed: 26096331
J Chem Phys. 2009 Aug 7;131(5):054106
pubmed: 19673550
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 03;7:43767
pubmed: 28256576
Phys Rev Lett. 2016 Nov 4;117(19):197203
pubmed: 27858437
J Chem Phys. 2012 Feb 7;136(5):054110
pubmed: 22320728
Phys Rev Lett. 2015 Aug 14;115(7):070501
pubmed: 26317701
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Sep 18;115(38):9497-9502
pubmed: 30166447
Rep Prog Phys. 2012 Sep;75(9):094501
pubmed: 22885729
Nat Commun. 2019 Apr 5;10(1):1571
pubmed: 30952854
Phys Rev Lett. 2016 Dec 23;117(26):267002
pubmed: 28059531
Phys Rev E. 2016 Oct;94(4-1):043311
pubmed: 27841597
Phys Rev Lett. 2003 Oct 31;91(18):186402
pubmed: 14611295
Phys Rev Lett. 2008 Jun 20;100(24):247206
pubmed: 18643626

Auteurs

Dominik Hangleiter (D)

Dahlem Center for Complex Quantum Systems, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Ingo Roth (I)

Dahlem Center for Complex Quantum Systems, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Daniel Nagaj (D)

RCQI, Institute of Physics, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia.

Jens Eisert (J)

Dahlem Center for Complex Quantum Systems, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Helmholtz Center Berlin, Hahn-Meitner-Platz 1, 14109 Berlin, Germany.

Classifications MeSH