Percutaneous vertebroplasty of the cervical spine performed via a posterior trans-pedicular approach.
Cervical vertebrae
Spinal neoplasms
Vertebroplasty
Journal
European radiology
ISSN: 1432-1084
Titre abrégé: Eur Radiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9114774
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2021
Feb 2021
Historique:
received:
16
06
2020
accepted:
14
08
2020
pubmed:
28
8
2020
medline:
15
4
2021
entrez:
28
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV) of the cervical spine has been traditionally performed with a trans-oral or antero-lateral approach. The posterior trans-pedicular approach (PTPA) has been sporadically reported. Therefore, the aim of this study is to retrospectively assess the technical feasibility, safety, and clinical outcomes of cervical PV performed with a PTPA. All consecutive patients undergoing PV in cervical levels with PTPA (under general anesthesia and computed tomography [CT] guidance) from January 2008 to November 2019 were identified. The following data were collected: patients' demographics; indication for PV; vertebral level features; procedure-related variables; and clinical outcomes including complications and pain relief. Thirty-two patients (18 females, 14 males; mean age 61.1 ± 13.2 years, range 36-88) were included accounting for 36 vertebrae. Three vertebrae (3/36, 8%) were referred due to an underlying traumatic fracture, the remaining (33/36, 92%) due to a painful lytic tumor. Technical success was 97% (35/36 levels). Mean time required to deploy the trocar was 23 ± 11 min (range 7-60). Extra-vertebral asymptomatic cement leakage was observed in 3/35 (9%) vertebral levels. One patient (1/32, 3%) developed an acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema requiring admission in the intensive care unit; another patient (1/32, 3%) developed localized infection to the skin entry site, which was managed conservatively. At 1-month follow-up, the mean pain in the study population was 1.0 ± 1.1 (range 0-4/10) vs 6.2 ± 1.4 (range 4-9/10) at baseline (p < 0.05). Cervical PV performed via a CT-guided PTPA is technically feasible, safe, and results in effective pain relief. • Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV) is a well-established technique for the treatment of benign and malignant compression fractures. • Common PV approaches used for cervical vertebrae include the trans-oral, antero-lateral, lateral, and sporadically the posterior trans-pedicular approach. • Retrospective analysis of our 11-year experience with the posterior trans-pedicular approach used for cervical vertebrae proved that such approach was safe and effective.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32851445
doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07198-6
pii: 10.1007/s00330-020-07198-6
doi:
Substances chimiques
Bone Cements
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
591-598Références
Health Quality Ontario (2016) Vertebral augmentation involving vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty for cancer-related vertebral compression fractures: a systematic review. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser 16(11):1–202
pmcid: 4973962
Tsoumakidou G, Too CW, Koch G et al (2017) CIRSE guidelines on percutaneous vertebral augmentation. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 40(3):331–342
doi: 10.1007/s00270-017-1574-8
Anselmetti GC, Marcia S, Saba L et al (2012) Percutaneous vertebroplasty: multi-centric results from EVEREST experience in large cohort of patients. Eur J Radiol 81(12):4083–4086
doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.07.005
Clarençon F, Fahed R, Cormier E et al (2020) Safety and effectiveness of cervical vertebroplasty: report of a large cohort and systematic review. Eur Radiol 30(3):1571–1583
doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06525-w
Tong FC, Cloft HJ, Joseph GJ, Rodts GR, Dion JE (2000) Transoral approach to cervical vertebroplasty for multiple myeloma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175(5):1322–1324
Guo WH, Meng MB, You X et al (2012) CT-guided percutaneous vertebroplasty of the upper cervical spine via a translateral approach. Pain Physician 15(5):E733–E741
pubmed: 22996868
Sun HY, Lee JW, Kim KJ, Yeom JS, Kang HS (2009) Percutaneous intervention of the C2 vertebral body using a CT-guided posterolateral approach. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193(6):1703–1705
Cianfoni A, Distefano D, Chin SH, Varma AK, Rumboldt Z, Bonaldi G (2012) Percutaneous cement augmentation of a lytic lesion of C1 via posterolateral approach under CT guidance. Spine J 12(6):500–506
Filippiadis DK, Binkert C, Pellerin O, Hoffmann RT, Krajina A, Pereira PL (2017) Cirse quality assurance document and standards for classification of complications: the CIRSE classification system. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 40(8):1141–1146
De la Garza-Ramos R, Benvenutti-Regato M, Caro-Osorio E (2016) Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for cervical spine metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Spine Surg 10:7
doi: 10.14444/3007
Bousson V, Guinebert S, Odri G et al (2020) Curved discography needle for percutaneous cervical spine vertebroplasty: a technical note. J Vasc Interv Radiol 31(4):686–689
doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2019.10.013