Development of a Mobile Health Intervention with Personal Experiments for Smokers Who Are Ambivalent About Quitting: Formative Design and Testing.

cessation development formative intervention mHealth motivation nicotine smartphone smoking tobacco

Journal

JMIR formative research
ISSN: 2561-326X
Titre abrégé: JMIR Form Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101726394

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
27 Aug 2020
Historique:
received: 25 06 2020
accepted: 03 08 2020
entrez: 28 8 2020
pubmed: 28 8 2020
medline: 28 8 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The majority of cigarette smokers want to quit someday but are not ready to commit to long-term abstinence. However, available smoking cessation treatments are not well-suited to meet the needs of these ambivalent smokers. Low-cost, high-reach mobile health (mHealth) interventions may be a cost-efficient means of offering assistance to ambivalent smokers, yet there are currently no evidence-based options available for this group. The aim of this study was to develop and preliminarily evaluate the core content for an mHealth program targeting adult smokers who are ambivalent about quitting. The core content consisted of a series of "personal experiments" similar to those tested as part of a counseling intervention in prior work, including brief cognitive or behavioral tasks designed to boost readiness for changing smoking behavior. We conducted individual user interviews (N=3) to refine program content, and then conducted a one-arm pilot study (N=25) to assess user receptivity and the potential impact of the experiments on motivation and self-efficacy to quit or reduce smoking. In user interviews, participants liked the concept of the personal experiments. Participants in the pilot study found a medium-fidelity prototype to be highly acceptable. After watching a brief orientation video that explained how the program works, most participants (80%, 20/25) indicated that it sounded interesting, primarily because it did not require any commitment to quit. All participants (100%, 25/25) completed all 7 experiments, including a 24-hour quit attempt, although not all were able to refrain from smoking for a full day based on qualitative feedback on the experiment. The mean rating of usefulness of the overall program was 4.12 (SD 1.09) out of 5, and the average rating of the difficulty of the experiments was 2.16 (SD 1.18) out of 5. At the last assessment point, 92% (23/25) of the participants indicated that they were more interested in either quitting or cutting back than when they began the program, and 72% (18/25) said that if the program had included a free trial of nicotine replacement therapy, they would have used it to try to quit smoking. This formative work confirmed that ambivalent smokers are willing to use and will remain engaged with an mHealth intervention that employs the novel concept of personal experiments to enhance their motivation for and ability to quit smoking. The addition of action-oriented treatment (self-help and free nicotine replacement therapy, quitline referral) could further support users' efforts to stop smoking and remain quit.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The majority of cigarette smokers want to quit someday but are not ready to commit to long-term abstinence. However, available smoking cessation treatments are not well-suited to meet the needs of these ambivalent smokers. Low-cost, high-reach mobile health (mHealth) interventions may be a cost-efficient means of offering assistance to ambivalent smokers, yet there are currently no evidence-based options available for this group.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to develop and preliminarily evaluate the core content for an mHealth program targeting adult smokers who are ambivalent about quitting. The core content consisted of a series of "personal experiments" similar to those tested as part of a counseling intervention in prior work, including brief cognitive or behavioral tasks designed to boost readiness for changing smoking behavior.
METHODS METHODS
We conducted individual user interviews (N=3) to refine program content, and then conducted a one-arm pilot study (N=25) to assess user receptivity and the potential impact of the experiments on motivation and self-efficacy to quit or reduce smoking.
RESULTS RESULTS
In user interviews, participants liked the concept of the personal experiments. Participants in the pilot study found a medium-fidelity prototype to be highly acceptable. After watching a brief orientation video that explained how the program works, most participants (80%, 20/25) indicated that it sounded interesting, primarily because it did not require any commitment to quit. All participants (100%, 25/25) completed all 7 experiments, including a 24-hour quit attempt, although not all were able to refrain from smoking for a full day based on qualitative feedback on the experiment. The mean rating of usefulness of the overall program was 4.12 (SD 1.09) out of 5, and the average rating of the difficulty of the experiments was 2.16 (SD 1.18) out of 5. At the last assessment point, 92% (23/25) of the participants indicated that they were more interested in either quitting or cutting back than when they began the program, and 72% (18/25) said that if the program had included a free trial of nicotine replacement therapy, they would have used it to try to quit smoking.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
This formative work confirmed that ambivalent smokers are willing to use and will remain engaged with an mHealth intervention that employs the novel concept of personal experiments to enhance their motivation for and ability to quit smoking. The addition of action-oriented treatment (self-help and free nicotine replacement therapy, quitline referral) could further support users' efforts to stop smoking and remain quit.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32852278
pii: v4i8e21784
doi: 10.2196/21784
pmc: PMC7484775
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e21784

Subventions

Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R21 CA234003
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

©Jaimee L Heffner, Sheryl L Catz, Predrag Klasnja, Brooks Tiffany, Jennifer B McClure. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (http://formative.jmir.org), 27.08.2020.

Références

Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014 Oct 1;143:87-94
pubmed: 25085225
Addiction. 2018 May 24;:
pubmed: 29797621
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017 Nov 10;66(44):1209-1215
pubmed: 29121001
Psychol Rev. 1977 Mar;84(2):191-215
pubmed: 847061
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Mar 16;22(3):354-362
pubmed: 30590810
Addiction. 2005 Aug;100(8):1036-9
pubmed: 16042624
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Aug 31;19(8):e305
pubmed: 28860108
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Aug 05;4(3):e95
pubmed: 27496593
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Mar 10;5(3):e31
pubmed: 28283465
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014 Apr 1;137:98-105
pubmed: 24529688
Acta Virol. 1975 Nov;19(6):501-8
pubmed: 2001
BMC Public Health. 2011 Mar 17;11:167
pubmed: 21414216
Nicotine Tob Res. 2014 Jul;16(7):992-9
pubmed: 24610399
JAMA. 2015 Feb 17;313(7):687-94
pubmed: 25688780
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011 Nov 11;60(44):1513-9
pubmed: 22071589
Addiction. 2011 Jun;106(6):1155-63
pubmed: 21226883
Nicotine Tob Res. 2005 Dec;7(6):881-9
pubmed: 16298723
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004 Jun;72(3):371-81
pubmed: 15279521
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2012 Jun 08;7:8
pubmed: 23186265
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Feb 12;4(1):e17
pubmed: 26872940
Behav Res Ther. 2006 Jan;44(1):1-25
pubmed: 16300724
BMJ. 2009 Apr 02;338:b1024
pubmed: 19342408
Respiration. 2005 Mar-Apr;72(2):216-20
pubmed: 15824536
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2011 Oct;41(3):305-12
pubmed: 21700411
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Aug 24;22(9):1446-1452
pubmed: 32236417
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Aug 25;12(9):10235-53
pubmed: 26308034
Nicotine Tob Res. 2014 Aug;16(8):1129-39
pubmed: 24727369

Auteurs

Jaimee L Heffner (JL)

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, United States.

Sheryl L Catz (SL)

Betty Irene Moore School of Nursing, University of California, Sacramento, CA, United States.

Predrag Klasnja (P)

Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States.
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.

Brooks Tiffany (B)

Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States.

Jennifer B McClure (JB)

Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States.

Classifications MeSH