Revisiting the Direct Brow Lift in Patients With Facial Palsy: 4 Key Modifications.
Journal
Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery
ISSN: 1537-2677
Titre abrégé: Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8508431
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
pubmed:
28
8
2020
medline:
20
4
2021
entrez:
28
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The direct brow lift is a simple and popular technique, particularly in patients with brow ptosis secondary to facial palsy. It provides a high degree of control in determining the degree of brow elevation and shape achieved. However, it is arguably the least debated in terms of addressing some of its sequelae, namely the risks of a visible or indrawn scar and forehead paraesthesia. In this article, we report outcomes using four alternative principles to those outlined in current published literature. All patients undergoing a primary direct brow lift for brow ptosis secondary to facial palsy between January 2015 and December 2019 under a single surgeon (R.M.) were included in the study. The technical refinements of the procedure included a W-plasty type stealth skin incision, counter-bevelling of the upper and lower incision lines, skin excision in the subcutaneous plane only with minimal excision of fat and browpexy to the frontal periosteum through small linear puncture incisions in the frontalis. A total of 23 patients undergoing 24 direct brow lifts were included in the study. The mean follow-up was 1.3 years (range 0.5-3 years). No patients reported postoperative forehead paraesthesia or brow alopecia. One patient required a further temporal browlift 15 months later. Brow height was rated excellent (0-1.5 mm difference) in 71% of brows and good (1.6-4.9 mm difference) in 14% of brows. The average Manchester scar scale was 8.6/28. The technical modifications presented substantially reduce the rates of postoperative paraesthesia, whilst achieving satisfactory aesthetic outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32852375
pii: 00002341-202103000-00015
doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000001794
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
179-182Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Inc.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have no financial or conflicts of interest to disclose.
Références
Vasconez LO, Core GB, Gamboa-Bobadilla M, et al. Endoscopic techniques in coronal brow lifting. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994; 94:788–793.
Loyo M, Jones D, Lee LN, et al. Treatment of the periocular complex in paralytic lagophthalmos. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2015; 124:273–279.
Passot R. Chirurgie Esthetique Pure: Techniques et Results. 1930, Paris: Gaston Doin et Cie
Ellenbogen R. Transcoronal eyebrow lift with concomitant upper blepharoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1983; 71:490–499.
McKinney P, Mossie RD, Zukowski ML. Criteria for the forehead lift. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1991; 15:141–147.
Green JP, Goldberg RA, Shorr N. Eyebrow ptosis. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1997; 37:97–122.
Ueda K, Harii K, Yamada A. Long-term follow-up study of browlift for treatment of facial paralysis. Ann Plast Surg. 1994; 32:166–170.
Booth AJ, Murray A, Tyers AG. The direct brow lift: efficacy, complications, and patient satisfaction. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004; 88:688–691.
Pascali M, Bocchini I, Avantaggiato A, et al. Direct brow lifting: specific indications for a simplified approach to eyebrow ptosis. Indian J Plast Surg. 2016; 49:66–71.
Hashemi H, KhabazKhoob M, Yazdani K, et al. White-to-white corneal diameter in the Tehran Eye Study. Cornea. 2010; 29:9–12.
Beausang E, Floyd H, Dunn KW, et al. A new quantitative scale for clinical scar assessment. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998; 102:1954–1961.
Malhotra R, Ziahosseini K, Poitelea C, et al. Effect of manuka honey on eyelid wound healing: a Randomized Controlled Trial. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017; 33:268–272.
Kelleher JC. W-plasty scar revision and its extended use. Clin Plast Surg. 1977; 4:247–254.
O’Doherty M, Joshi N. The “bespoke” upper eyelid blepharoplasty and brow rejuvenation. Facial Plast Surg. 2013; 29:264–272.
Camirand A, Doucet J. A comparison between parallel hairline incisions and perpendicular incisions when performing a face lift. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997; 99:10–15.
Feinendegen DL, Tremp M, Roldán JC. Flat incision technique for reconstructive brow surgery: a wound healing model and clinical evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018; 6:e1684.
Brown S, Mirmanesh M, Song P, et al. Beveled incisions: what is the evidence? Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2018; 42:743–747.
Feinendegen DL, Constantinescu MA, Knutti DA, et al. Brow reduction, reshaping and suspension by a 20-degree beveled brow incision technique. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016; 44:958–963.
Blandford AD, Bachour SP, Chen R, et al. Dimensions and morphologic variability of the retro-orbicularis oculi and frontalis muscle fat pad. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019; 35:447–450.