Effects of patient-therapist interpersonal complementarity on alliance and outcome in cognitive-behavioral therapies for depression: Moving toward interpersonal responsiveness.


Journal

Journal of counseling psychology
ISSN: 0022-0167
Titre abrégé: J Couns Psychol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 2985124R

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2021
Historique:
pubmed: 28 8 2020
medline: 5 10 2021
entrez: 28 8 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

This study analyzed patient-therapist in-session interpersonal complementarity effects on the therapeutic alliance and depression severity during the initial and working phase of cognitive-behavioral therapy for depression. It also explored whether patients' interpersonal problems moderate those complementarity effects. We drew on a sample of 90 dyads derived from a randomized controlled trial of two cognitive-behavioral therapies for depression. Using an observer-based measure, we assessed patients' and therapists' interpersonal behavior in Sessions 1, 5, 9, and 13 and computed their complementarity regarding interpersonal affiliation (i.e., correspondence) and dominance (i.e., reciprocity). Patients completed measures of interpersonal problems at baseline and session-by-session measures of depression severity and quality of the therapeutic alliance. Response surface analyses based on polynomial regressions showed that patient-therapist complementarity in higher affiliative behaviors was associated with a stronger alliance. Interpersonal problems regarding agency moderated the complementarity effects of the dominance dimensions on depression severity. Overly dominant patients benefited more from a nonreciprocal relationship in the dominance dimension, whereas submissive patients benefited more from complementarity in that dimension. Furthermore, interpersonal problems of communion significantly moderated the effects of complementarity in affiliative behaviors on both the alliance and outcome. These results suggest the relevance of both interpersonal correspondence and reciprocity for the psychotherapy process, informing clinical practice in terms of interpersonal responsiveness. The moderation effects of interpersonal problems provide preliminary evidence, which should be replicated in future research, to determine relevant markers indicating for whom a complementary approach would be beneficial in cognitive therapy for depression. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Identifiants

pubmed: 32852967
pii: 2020-61813-001
doi: 10.1037/cou0000528
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

582-592

Auteurs

Juan Martín Gómez Penedo (JM)

Department of Psychology, University of Buenos Aires.

Julian Rubel (J)

Department of Psychology, Justus-Liebig University Giessen.

Tobias Krieger (T)

Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy Department, University of Bern.

Nicolás Alalú (N)

Department of Psychology, University of Buenos Aires.

Anna Margarete Babl (AM)

Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy Department, University of Bern.

Andrés Roussos (A)

Department of Psychology, University of Buenos Aires.

Martin Grosse Holtforth (M)

Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy Department, University of Bern.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH