Radiographic scoliosis angle estimation: spline-based measurement reveals superior reliability compared to traditional COBB method.
Automatic measurement
COBB angle
Deep learning
Low image quality
Radiographic
Scoliosis curve
Journal
European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society
ISSN: 1432-0932
Titre abrégé: Eur Spine J
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9301980
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2021
03 2021
Historique:
received:
15
05
2020
accepted:
17
08
2020
revised:
25
07
2020
pubmed:
29
8
2020
medline:
3
7
2021
entrez:
29
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Although being standard for scoliosis curve size estimation, COBB angle measurement is well known to be inaccurate, due to a high interobserver variance in end vertebra selection and end plate contour delineation. We propose a stepwise improvement by using a spline constructed from vertebra centroids to resemble spinal curve characteristics more closely. To enhance precision even further, a neural net was trained to detect the centroids automatically. Vertebra centroids in AP spinal X-ray images of varying quality from 551 scoliosis patients were manually labeled by 4 investigators. With these inputs, splines were generated and the computed curve sizes were compared to the manually measured COBB angles and to the curve estimation obtained from the neural net. Splines achieved a higher interobserver correlation of 0.92-0.95 compared to manual COBB measurements (0.83-0.92) and showed 1.5-2 times less variance, depending on the anatomic region. This translates into an average of 1° of interobserver measurement deviation for spline-based curve estimation compared to 3°-8° for COBB measurements. The neural net was even more precise and achieved mean deviations below 0.5°. In conclusion, our data suggest an advantage of spline-based automated measuring systems, so further investigations are warranted to abandon manual COBB measurements.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32856177
doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06577-3
pii: 10.1007/s00586-020-06577-3
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
676-685Références
Vrtovec T, Pernuš F, Likar B (2009) A review of methods for quantitative evaluation of spinal curvature. Eur Spine J 18:593–607
doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-0913-0
De Carvalho A, Vialle R, Thomsen L et al (2007) Reliability analysis for manual measurement of coronal plane deformity in adolescent scoliosis. Are 30 × 90 cm plain films better than digitized small films? Eur Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-007-0437-4
doi: 10.1007/s00586-007-0437-4
pubmed: 17619912
pmcid: 2078320
Wills BPD, Auerbach JD, Zhu X et al (2007) Comparison of Cobb angle measurement of scoliosis radiographs with preselected end vertebrae: Traditional versus digital acquisition. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000251086.84420.d1
doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000251086.84420.d1
Dutton KE, Jones TJ, Slinger BS et al (1989) Reliability of the Cobb angle index derived from traditional and computer-assisted methods. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 12:16
pubmed: 2705960
Tanure MC, Pinheiro AP, Oliveira AS (2010) Reliability assessment of Cobb angle measurements using manual and digital methods. Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2010.02.020
doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.02.020
pubmed: 20359959
Shea KG, Stevens PM, Nelson M et al (1998) A comparison of manual versus computer-assisted radiographic measurement: Intraobserver measurement variability for Cobb angles. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199803010-00007
doi: 10.1097/00007632-199803010-00007
Wu H, Bailey C, Rasoulinejad P, Li S (2018) Automated comprehensive Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis assessment using MVC-Net. Med Image Anal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2018.05.005
doi: 10.1016/j.media.2018.05.005
pubmed: 30453165
pmcid: 6276374
Bonanni PG (2017) Contour and angle-function based scoliosis monitoring: relaxing the requirement on image quality in the measurement of spinal curvature. Int J Spine Surg. https://doi.org/10.14444/4022
doi: 10.14444/4022
pubmed: 28765806
pmcid: 5537975
Papaliodis DN, Bonanni PG, Roberts TT et al (2017) Computer assisted Cobb angle measurements: a novel algorithm. Int J Spine Surg. https://doi.org/10.14444/4021
doi: 10.14444/4021
pubmed: 28765805
pmcid: 5537975
Huang SH, Chu YH, Lai SH, Novak CL (2009) Learning-based vertebra detection and iterative normalized-cut segmentation for spinal MRI. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2009.2023362
doi: 10.1109/TMI.2009.2023362
pubmed: 19783497
pmcid: 2871258
Glocker B, Zikic D, Konukoglu E, et al (2013) Vertebrae localization in pathological spine CT via dense classification from sparse annotations. In: Lecture notes in computer science (including subseries lecture notes in artificial intelligence and lecture notes in bioinformatics)
Lecron F, Benjelloun M, Mahmoudi S (2012) Fully automatic vertebra detection in x-ray images based on multi-class SVM. In: Medical imaging 2012: image processing
Xu X, Hao HW, Yin XC, et al (2012) Automatic segmentation of cervical vertebrae in X-ray images. In: Proceedings of the international joint conference on neural networks
Al Arif SMMR, Knapp K, Slabaugh G (2018) Fully automatic cervical vertebrae segmentation framework for X-ray images. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.01.006
doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.01.006
pubmed: 29477438
Brink RC, Wijdicks SPJ, Tromp IN et al (2018) A reliability and validity study for different coronal angles using ultrasound imaging in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2017.10.012
doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.10.012
pubmed: 29730458
Takács M, Orlovits Z, Jáger B, Kiss RM (2018) Comparison of spinal curvature parameters as determined by the ZEBRIS spine examination method and the Cobb method in children with scoliosis. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200245
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200245
pubmed: 29985957
pmcid: 6037360
Knott P, Pappo E, Cameron M, et al (2014) SOSORT 2012 consensus paper: reducing x-ray exposure in pediatric patients with scoliosis. Scoliosis
Lenke LG, Edwards CC 2nd, Bridwell KH (2003) The Lenke classification of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: how it organizes curve patterns as a template to perform selective fusions of the spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:S199–S207. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BRS.0000092216.16155.33
doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000092216.16155.33
Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T (2015) U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: Lecture notes in computer science (including subseries lecture notes in artificial intelligence and lecture notes in bioinformatics)
He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J (2016) Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition
Stokes IAF, Aronsson DD (2006) Computer-assisted algorithms improve reliability of king classification and cobb angle measurement of scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000203708.49972.ab
doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000203708.49972.ab