Assembling organ donation: situating organ donation in hospital practice.


Journal

Sociology of health & illness
ISSN: 1467-9566
Titre abrégé: Sociol Health Illn
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8205036

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 2020
Historique:
received: 04 02 2020
revised: 03 06 2020
accepted: 28 07 2020
pubmed: 29 8 2020
medline: 19 8 2021
entrez: 29 8 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In this article I argue for the need to situate deceased organ donation in and as a hospital practice. This study puts the spotlight on the practical conditions that enable and emplace organ donation in the hospital setting. The analytical move serves the political purpose to inform and interrogate dominant policy framings intended to address the problem of organ shortage. I present an ethnographic investigation that draws upon a Science and Technology Studies (STS) approach to make visible the sociomaterial arrangements that bring together people, things and politics in the assembling of organ donation at a Catalan hospital. A progressive and indeterminate process which might fall through and become disassembled at any given time. This, as I explain, challenges current opt-out policy that unnecessarily reduces donation to an individual choice to be decided upon in life. Instead, and drawing on ethnographic materials, I propose a situated and relational understanding of organ donation: an embedded health care and procurement practice enacted as a collective accomplishment. I conclude that (more) responsible donation policies need to be informed by, and attuned to, the situated practicalities and enduring tensions that condition and constrain the assembling of organ donation at the hospital setting.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32856332
doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13177
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1934-1948

Informations de copyright

© 2020 The Author. Sociology of Health & Illness published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Foundation for SHIL (SHIL).

Références

Beaulieu, A. (2010) Research note: from co-location to co-presence: Shifts in the use of ethnography for the study of knowledge, Social Studies of Science, 40, 453-70.
Bird, S.M. and Harris, J. (2010) Time to move to presumed consent for organ donation, BMJ: British Medical Journal, 340.
Brennan, S. (2015) New opt-out system in Wales aims to revolutionise organ donation The Guardian, 25 November.
Coppen, R., Friele, R.D., Marquet, R.L. and Gevers, S.K.M. (2005) Opting-out systems: no guarantee for higher donation rates, Transplant International, 18, 1275-9.
Delmonico, F.L., Domínguez-GIL, B., Matesanz, R. and Noel, L. (2011) A call for government accountability to achieve national self-sufficiency in organ donation and transplantation, The Lancet, 378, 1414-8.
Dimond, R., Machin, L. and Frith, L. (2019) Editorial: Towards a sociology of donation, Sociology of Health & Illness, 41, 549-52.
Fabre, J., Murphy, P. and Matesanz, R. (2010) Presumed consent: a distraction in the quest for increasing rates of organ donation, BMJ, 341, c4973.
Fox, R.E.C. and Swazey, J.P. (1992) Spare Parts : Organ Replacement in American Society. New York: Oxford University Press.
Fox, R.R.C. and Swazey, J.P. (1974) The Courage to Fail: A Social View of Organ Transplants and Dialysis. Piscataway: Transaction Publishers.
Galasiński, D. and Sque, M. (2016) Organ donation agency: a discourse analysis of correspondence between donor and organ recipient families, Sociology of Health & Illness, 38, 1350-63.
Garforth, L. (2012) In/visibilities of research: seeing and knowing in STS, Science, Technology & Human Values, 37, 264-85.
Gomez, P.A.D.S.C., (2008) The family interview. Technique and results. In Matesanz, R.(ed)El Modelo Español de Coordinación y Transplantes (The Spanish Model of Coordination and Transplantation). Madrid: Aula Medica.
Hadders, H. and Alnaes, A.H. (2013) Enacting death: contested practices in the organ donation clinic, Nursing Inquiry, 20, 245-55.
Haddow, G. (2005) The phenomenology of death, embodiment and organ transplantation, Sociology of Health & Illness, 27, 92-113.
Haraway, D. (1988) Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective, Feminist studies, 14, 575-99.
Department Of Health. (2008) Organs for transplants: A report from the Organ Donation Taskforce. Department of Health London.
Hoeyer, K., Jensen, A.M. and Olejaz, M. (2015) Transplantation as an abstract good: practising deliberate ignorance in deceased organ donation in Denmark, Sociology of Health & Illness, 37, 578-93.
Hogle, L.F. (1995). Tales from the cryptic: Technology meets organism in the living cadaver. In: Gray, C.H.(ed.) The Cyborg Handbook. New York: Routledge.
Hogle, L.F. (1999) Recovering the nation's body : cultural memory, medicine, and the politics of redemption, New Brunswick, N.J London: Rutgers University Press.
Latour, B. (2000) When things strike back: a possible contribution of ‘science studies’ to the social sciences, The British Journal of Sociology, 51, 107-23.
Lock, M. (2002) Twice dead : organ transplants and the reinvention of death, Berkeley. Calif: London, University of California Press.
Lock, M. (2004) Living cadavers and the calculation of death, Body & Society, 10, 135-52.
Lock, M. and Crowley-Makota, M. (2008) Situating the practice of organ donation in familial, cultural, and political context, Transplantation Reviews, 22, 154-7.
Manzano, A. and Pawson, R. (2014) Evaluating deceased organ donation: a programme theory approach, Journal of Health, Organisation and Management, 28, 366-85.
Matesanz, R., Domínguez-Gil, B., Coll, E., et al. (2011) Spanish experience as a leading country: what kind of measures were taken?. Oxford UK.
Mauss, M. (1954) The gift: Forms and functions of exchange in archaic society. London: Cohen & West.
Mcgee, H. (2019). Cabinet to finally consider ‘opt-out’ organ donation law. The Irish Times, 2 January.
Mol, A. (2002) The Body Multiple : Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
Paul, K.T., Avezaat, C.J., Ijzermans, J.N., et al. (2014) Organ donation as transition work: policy discourse and clinical practice in The Netherlands, Health, 18, 369-87.
Pfaller, L., Hansen, S.L., Adloff, F. and Schicktanz, S. (2018) ‘Saying no to organ donation’: an empirical typology of reluctance and rejection, Sociology of Health & Illness, 40, 1327-46.
Quigley, M., Brazier, M., Chadwick, R.,,et al. (2008) The organs crisis and the Spanish model: theoretical versus pragmatic considerations, Journal of Medical Ethics, 34, 223-4.
Rithalia, A., Mcdaid, C., Suekarran, S., et al. (2009) Impact of presumed consent for organ donation on donation rates: a systematic review, BMJ, 338.
Roulston, K. (2010) Reflective interviewing: A guide to theory and practice. London: Sage.
Sanner, M.A. (2001) Exchanging spare parts or becoming a new person? People's attitudes toward receiving and donating organs, Social Science & Medicine, 52, 1491-9.
Scheper-Hughes, N. (2001) Commodity fetishism in organs trafficking, Body & Society, 7, 31-62.
Sharp, L.A. (2006) Strange Harvest : Organ Transplants, Denatured Bodies, and the Transformed Self. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Shaw, R. (2010) Organ donation in Aotearoa/New Zealand: Cultural phenomenology and moral humility, Body & Society, 16, 127-47.
Shaw, R. (2015) Expanding the conceptual toolkit of organ gifting, Sociology of Health & Illness, 37, 952-66.
Siminoff, L.A., Burant, C. and Youngner, S.J. (2004) Death and organ procurement: public beliefs and attitudes, Social Science & Medicine, 59, 2325-34.
Sque, M., Long, T., Payne, S. and Allardyce, D. (2008) Why relatives do not donate organs for transplants: 'sacrifice' or 'gift of life'?, Journal Of Advanced Nursing, 61, 134-44.
Titmuss, R.M. (1971) The Gift Relationship: From Human Blood to Social Policy. New York: Pantheon Books.
Watson, R. (2010) Pan-European organ transplant scheme promises to cut waiting times, BMJ, 340.
Willis, B.H. and Quigley, M. (2014) Opt-out organ donation: on evidence and public policy, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 107, 56-60.
Wright, L. (2007) Head to head: is presumed consent the answer to organ shortages?, No. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 334, 1089.

Auteurs

Sara Bea (S)

Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, School of Global Affairs, Faculty of Social Science & Public Policy, King's College London, London, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH