Exploring the Barriers to Cervical Cancer Screening through the Lens of Implementers and Beneficiaries of the National Screening Program: A Multi-Contextual Study.


Journal

Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP
ISSN: 2476-762X
Titre abrégé: Asian Pac J Cancer Prev
Pays: Thailand
ID NLM: 101130625

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 08 2020
Historique:
received: 05 11 2019
entrez: 29 8 2020
pubmed: 29 8 2020
medline: 4 6 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Cervical cancer is a major reason for morbidity and mortality in Low and Middle income countries. The National Programme for Prevention and Control of Cancers, Diabetes, Cardiovascular Diseases and Stroke (NPCDCS) sets out broad national guideline to implement Cervical cancer screening. However, an implementation strategy for cervical cancer screening is not in place for districts. Although opportunistic screening takes place, implementation is hindered by psychological and physical barriers for women, as well as insufficient capacity on the part of implementers. This qualitative study aims to identify the specific barriers that prevent the uptake of cervical cancer screening. Women who could benefit from cervical cancer program were interviewed to explore the factors that influenced their uptake of the cervical screening offered. Key informant interviews were conducted with implementers of the NPCDCS and with public health staff of three States (Himachal Pradesh, Meghalaya and Karnataka), to understand their perception of determinants of the utilization of screening services. The general health concern among the participants was low, and routine check-ups were considered unimportant. Poor knowledge about cervical cancer, benefits of screening service availability, as well as a general sense of well-being, embarrassment or anxiety related to the screening procedure, fear of being judged for lack of modesty, and stigma were common barriers to screening uptake. In addition to a general unawareness of cervical cancer geographical inaccessibility of screening as a barrier to participate in cervical cancer screening, in certain regions. It is essential to increase the knowledge on cervical cancer and on the benefits of screening among Indian women. Providing information and cues to action by health workers and professionals can facilitate the decision to participate. Implementers need to be involved to ensure context specific implementation of the National programme to overcome these barriers.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Cervical cancer is a major reason for morbidity and mortality in Low and Middle income countries. The National Programme for Prevention and Control of Cancers, Diabetes, Cardiovascular Diseases and Stroke (NPCDCS) sets out broad national guideline to implement Cervical cancer screening. However, an implementation strategy for cervical cancer screening is not in place for districts. Although opportunistic screening takes place, implementation is hindered by psychological and physical barriers for women, as well as insufficient capacity on the part of implementers. This qualitative study aims to identify the specific barriers that prevent the uptake of cervical cancer screening.
METHODS
Women who could benefit from cervical cancer program were interviewed to explore the factors that influenced their uptake of the cervical screening offered. Key informant interviews were conducted with implementers of the NPCDCS and with public health staff of three States (Himachal Pradesh, Meghalaya and Karnataka), to understand their perception of determinants of the utilization of screening services.
RESULTS
The general health concern among the participants was low, and routine check-ups were considered unimportant. Poor knowledge about cervical cancer, benefits of screening service availability, as well as a general sense of well-being, embarrassment or anxiety related to the screening procedure, fear of being judged for lack of modesty, and stigma were common barriers to screening uptake. In addition to a general unawareness of cervical cancer geographical inaccessibility of screening as a barrier to participate in cervical cancer screening, in certain regions.
CONCLUSION
It is essential to increase the knowledge on cervical cancer and on the benefits of screening among Indian women. Providing information and cues to action by health workers and professionals can facilitate the decision to participate. Implementers need to be involved to ensure context specific implementation of the National programme to overcome these barriers.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32856846
doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.8.2209
pmc: PMC7771922
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2209-2215

Références

Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Oct 1;35(10):1753-1758
pubmed: 27702945
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2011 Mar 14;5:125-31
pubmed: 21448296
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2019 Jun;20:20-26
pubmed: 31084813
Soc Sci Med. 2005 Dec;61(12):2528-35
pubmed: 15953668
Int J Behav Med. 2008;15(4):289-92
pubmed: 19005928
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010 May;19(5):1373-80
pubmed: 20447927
Int J Prev Med. 2012 Aug;3(8):585-90
pubmed: 22973490
Indian J Med Res. 2012 Aug;136(2):205-10
pubmed: 22960886
Ecancermedicalscience. 2012;6:270
pubmed: 23008746
Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88
pubmed: 16204405
Women Health. 2016;56(4):468-86
pubmed: 26479700
BMC Public Health. 2012 Jan 10;12:22
pubmed: 22233530
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Oct;19(10):1289-1306
pubmed: 30219626
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2006 May;17(2 Suppl):31-54
pubmed: 16809874
Indian J Cancer. 2018 Oct-Dec;55(4):318-326
pubmed: 30829264
BMC Public Health. 2016 Aug 24;16(1):868
pubmed: 27557928
Lancet. 2006 Nov 4;368(9547):1581-6
pubmed: 17084758
Cancer Detect Prev. 2003;27(6):457-65
pubmed: 14642554
Ci Ji Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Sep 16;31(4):240-243
pubmed: 31867252
Prev Med. 2004 Jul;39(1):91-8
pubmed: 15207990
Am J Health Promot. 1996 Mar-Apr;10(4):282-98
pubmed: 10159709
Int J Cancer. 2010 Feb 15;126(4):976-84
pubmed: 19697326

Auteurs

Jyoshma Preema Dsouza (JP)

School of Public Health, Psychological Research Institute, UCLouvain University of Belgium, Louvain-la-neuve, Belgium.

Stephan Van Den Broucke (S)

School of Public Health, Psychological Research Institute, UCLouvain University of Belgium, Louvain-la-neuve, Belgium.

Sanjay Pattanshetty (S)

Prasanna School of Public Health, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.

William Dhoore (W)

School of Public Health, Psychological Research Institute, UCLouvain University of Belgium, Louvain-la-neuve, Belgium.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH