Estimation of Salivary 8-Hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) as a Potential Biomarker in Assessing Progression towards Malignancy: A Case-Control Study.
8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine
Oral submucous fibrosis
oral squamous cell carcinoma
oxidative stress
premalignancy
Journal
Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP
ISSN: 2476-762X
Titre abrégé: Asian Pac J Cancer Prev
Pays: Thailand
ID NLM: 101130625
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Aug 2020
01 Aug 2020
Historique:
received:
04
05
2020
entrez:
29
8
2020
pubmed:
29
8
2020
medline:
4
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Squamous Cell Carcinoma is almost always preceded by potentially malignant disorders in the oral cavity before malignant transformation. Characterization of 8-OHdG from the saliva offers a relatively non-invasive, simple and efficient methodology for monitoring oxidative stress in subjects of Premalignant oral disorders (PMOD) and Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OSCC). Hence the aim of the current study is to estimate the levels of salivary 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) as a potential DNA Damage Biomarker in OSMF and OSCC patients in comparison to healthy individuals to assess disease progression from potentially malignant oral disorder to frank malignancy. The study was conducted among 90 patients [Oral Squamous cell carcinoma (n=30) and Oral Submucous Fibrosis (n=30) and healthy gender and age matched controls (n=30)]. 4ml of unstimulated saliva was collected from each of the subjects and was subjected to Sandwich ELISA for the quantification of salivary 8-OHdG. Statistical analysis was done using ANOVA, and p value was set at ≤0.05. The mean age of OSCC patients were 56.8±11.8 years. Smoking was the most prevalent adverse habit among this group (66.6%) followed by Smokeless tobacco chewers (40%). The mean age of OSMF patients was 46.2± 9.8 years. Smokeless tobacco was the most predominant habit among the OSMF patients (83.33%) followed by smoking (33.33%). The mean OHdG levels among the controls was 6.59±1.47 (ng/dl) and almost doubled in patients of OSMF 13.89±1.96(ng/dL) and further raised in OSCC patients 19.96 ± 2.11 (ng/dL). These levels showed a highly significant difference (p <0.0001) in mean on comparison by using one-way ANOVA. Pearson correlation between the groups were also statistically significant (p=0.000). There were significant differences in the concentration of salivary 8-OHdG between healthy controls, OSMF, and OSCC patients. Hence, 8-OHdG can be used as a novel biomarker of DNA damage to assess disease progression.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32856861
doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.8.2325
pmc: PMC7771935
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
8-Hydroxy-2'-Deoxyguanosine
88847-89-6
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2325-2329Références
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2014 Jul;7(7):639-47
pubmed: 24806664
Diabetologia. 2018 Apr;61(4):977-984
pubmed: 29185011
Mutat Res. 2010 Nov 28;703(1):11-7
pubmed: 20833264
Nitric Oxide. 2006 Mar;14(2):137-43
pubmed: 16290060
Contemp Clin Dent. 2015 Sep;6(Suppl 1):S172-4
pubmed: 26604570
Biotech Histochem. 2015;90(7):552-8
pubmed: 25839238
Eur J Oral Sci. 2009 Oct;117(5):555-62
pubmed: 19758252
Carcinogenesis. 2006 Jun;27(6):1245-50
pubmed: 16364924
Arch Oral Biol. 2012 Dec;57(12):1651-6
pubmed: 23092610
Am J Pathol. 1999 May;154(5):1423-9
pubmed: 10329595
Head Neck Oncol. 2009 May 02;1:10
pubmed: 19409103
Free Radic Res. 2019 May;53(5):497-521
pubmed: 31039624
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(11):4405-9
pubmed: 24969860
Addict Biol. 2002 Jan;7(1):115-25
pubmed: 11900631
J Cancer Res Ther. 2016 Apr-Jun;12(2):438-46
pubmed: 27461591
Cancer. 2007 Jan 1;109(1):54-9
pubmed: 17099862
Free Radic Biol Med. 2000 Jan 1;28(1):13-7
pubmed: 10656286
J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev. 2009 Apr;27(2):120-39
pubmed: 19412858
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(7):3513-7
pubmed: 22994787
Oral Oncol. 2004 Aug;40(7):697-704
pubmed: 15172639
Indian J Cancer. 2012 Jul-Sep;49(3):309-15
pubmed: 23238150
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(9):4353-6
pubmed: 23167342
J Clin Exp Dent. 2016 Apr 01;8(2):e184-93
pubmed: 27034760