High clinical performance and quantitative assessment of antibody kinetics using a dual recognition assay for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibodies.
COVID-19
Kinetics
SARS-CoV-2
Serology
Symptom onset
Journal
Clinical biochemistry
ISSN: 1873-2933
Titre abrégé: Clin Biochem
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0133660
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Dec 2020
Historique:
received:
22
06
2020
revised:
11
08
2020
accepted:
19
08
2020
pubmed:
29
8
2020
medline:
22
12
2020
entrez:
29
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Several serological SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays have been developed recently but require external validation before widespread use. This study aims at assessing the analytical and clinical performance of the iFlash® anti-SARS-CoV-2 chemiluminescence assay for the detection of both IgM and IgG antibodies. The kinetics of the antibody response was also evaluated. The precision, carry-over, linearity, limit of blank, detection and quantification were assessed. Sensitivity analysis was performed by using 178 sera collected from 154 RT-PCR confirmed COVID-19 patients. The specificity analysis was performed from 75 selected non-SARS-CoV-2 sera with a potential cross-reaction to the SARS-CoV-2 immunoassay. This iFlash® SARS-CoV-2 assay showed excellent analytical performance. After 2 weeks since symptom onset, the sensitivities for IgM and IgG were 62.2% (95% CI: 52.3-71.2%) and 92.9%% (95% CI: 85.7-96.7%), respectively by using the cut-off provided by the manufacturer. After cut-off optimization (i.e. >2.81 for IgM and >4.86 for IgG), the sensitivity for IgM and IgG were 81.6 (95% CI: 72.7-88.1%) and 95.9% (95% CI: 89.4-98.7%), respectively. Optimized cut-off for IgG improved the sensitivity to reach 100% (95%CI: 87.6-100) from 28 days since symptom onset. This study shows that the iFlash® SARS-CoV-2 assay from YHLO biotechnology, has satisfactory analytical performance. Nevertheless, the sensitivity of the IgM is limited for a proper clinical use compared to IgG. The determination of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies from 28 days since symptom onset was associated with high sensitivity, especially using optimized cut-offs (i.e. 100%).
Identifiants
pubmed: 32858061
pii: S0009-9120(20)30817-1
doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2020.08.009
pmc: PMC7445483
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Viral
0
Immunoglobulin G
0
Immunoglobulin M
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
23-27Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Jun 25;58(7):1070-1076
pubmed: 32172228
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Sep 25;58(10):e193-e196
pubmed: 32639942
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018 Nov 27;56(12):2015-2038
pubmed: 30004902
Nat Med. 2020 Aug;26(8):1200-1204
pubmed: 32555424
J Infect. 2020 Aug;81(2):e91-e92
pubmed: 32417311
Nat Med. 2020 Jun;26(6):845-848
pubmed: 32350462
Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Apr 05;10(4):
pubmed: 32260471
JAMA. 2020 Jun 9;323(22):2245-2246
pubmed: 32391855
N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 26;382(13):1268-1269
pubmed: 32109011
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Jun 25;58(7):1081-1088
pubmed: 32301749
Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 Jul;26(7):1478-1488
pubmed: 32267220
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Jun 25;58(7):1037-1052
pubmed: 32459192
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Jun 25;58(7):1144-1145
pubmed: 32386187
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Jul;20(7):758-759
pubmed: 32330441
J Clin Virol. 2020 Jul;128:104413
pubmed: 32403010
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Jul 28;58(8):1357-1364
pubmed: 32447328
J Med Virol. 2020 Sep;92(9):1671-1675
pubmed: 32330291
Clin Chem. 2020 Jul 1;66(7):875-877
pubmed: 32343775
Clin Chem. 2020 Aug 1;66(8):1104-1106
pubmed: 32484887
Clin Chim Acta. 2020 Oct;509:1-7
pubmed: 32485157