Complex Liver Transplantation Using Venovenous Bypass With an Atypical Placement of the Portal Vein Cannula.


Journal

Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society
ISSN: 1527-6473
Titre abrégé: Liver Transpl
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100909185

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2021
Historique:
received: 03 04 2020
revised: 06 06 2020
accepted: 01 07 2020
pubmed: 29 8 2020
medline: 26 3 2021
entrez: 29 8 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In liver transplantation (LT) medical literature, venovenous bypass (VVB) with the interposition of a venous graft attached to the inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) or to the splenic vein (SV) has not been reported previously. Here, we report the decompression of the portomesenteric compartment in 2 patients with complex cases of orthotopic LT. A femoroaxillary percutaneous VVB was installed prior to abdominal opening to decompress massive collateral veins in the abdominal wall. In the first patient, the IMV was connected to a donor vein graft with a lateroterminal anastomosis, and the distal part of the vein graft was cannulated and connected to the VVB. In the second patient, because of the excessive size of the spleen, it was necessary to perform a splenectomy to gain sufficient space in the abdomen to implant the new liver. The SV was connected to a donor vein graft with a terminoterminal anastomosis, and the distal part of the vein graft was cannulated and connected to the VVB. In both patients, the decompression of the portomesenteric compartment was crucial to reduce portal hypertension and to access the hepatic hilum, where the dissection was very complex due to previous major surgeries. In conclusion, VVB with the interposition of a venous graft attached to the IMV or to the SV during LT is a safe and simple technique, and it may be useful for patients needing VVB with no standard access to the portal compartment, particularly in the case of severe portal hypertension and re-LTs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32858761
doi: 10.1002/lt.25878
pii: 01445473-202102000-00013
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

231-235

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Références

Starzl TE, Marchioro TL, VonKaulla KN, Hermann G, Brittain RS, Waddell WR. Homotranspantation of the liver in humans. Surg Gynecol Obs 1963;117:659–676.
Lerut JP, Molle G, Donataccio M, De Kock M, Ciccarelli O, Laterre PF, et al. Cavocaval liver transplantation without venovenous bypass and without temporary portocaval shunting: the ideal technique for adult liver grafting? Transpl Int 1997;10:171–179.
Shaw BW Jr, Martin DJ, Marquez JM, Kang YG, Bugbee AC Jr, Iwatsuki S, et al. Venous bypass in clinical liver transplantation. Ann Surg 1984;200:524–534.
Margarit C, Lázaro JL, Balsells J, Charco R, Murio E, Edo A, Gifre E. Recipient hepatectomy with preservation of inferior vena cava reduces the need for veno‐venous bypass in liver transplantation. Transpl Int 1994;7(suppl 1):152–154.
Chari RS, Gan TJ, Robertson KM, Bass K, Camargo CA Jr, Greig PD, Clavien PA. Venovenous bypass in adult orthotopic liver transplantation: routine or selective use? J Am Coll Surg 1998;186:683–690.
Lai Q, Nudo F, Molinaro A, Mennini G, Spoletini G, Melandro F, et al. Does caval reconstruction technique affect early graft function after liver transplantation? a preliminary analysis. Transplant Proc 2011;43:1103–1106.
Sakai T, Matsusaki T, Marsh JW, Hilmi IA, Planinsic RM. Comparison of surgical methods in liver transplantation: retrohepatic caval resection with venovenous bypass (VVB) versus piggyback (PB) with VVB versus PB without VVB. Transpl Int 2010;23:1247–1258.
Veroli P, el Hage C, Ecoffey C. Does adult liver transplantation without venovenous bypass result in renal failure? Anesth Analg 1992;75:489–494.
Belghiti J, Ettorre GM, Durand F, Sommacale D, Sauvanet A, Jerius JT, Farges O. Feasibility and limits of caval‐flow preservation during liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2001;7:983–987.
Mehrabi A, Mood ZA, Fonouni H, Kashfi A, Hillebrand N, Müller SA, et al. A single‐center experience of 500 liver transplants using the modified piggyback technique by Belghiti. Liver Transpl 2009;15:466–474.
Miyamoto S, Polak WG, Geuken E, Peeters PMJG, Jong KP, Porte RJ, et al. Liver transplantation with preservation of the inferior vena cava. A comparison of conventional and piggyback techniques in adults. Clin Transplant 2004;18:686–693.
Cherqui D, Lauzet JY, Rotman N, Duvoux C, Dhumeaux D, Julien M, Fagniez PL. Orthotopic liver transplantation with preservation of the caval and portal flows. technique and results in 62 cases. Transplantation 1994;58:793–796.
Nikeghbalian S, Dehghani M, Salahi H, Bahador A, Kazemi K, Kakaei F, et al. Effects of surgical technique on postoperative renal function after orthotopic liver transplant. Exp Clin Transplant 2009;7:25–27.
Tincani G, Hoti E, Andreani P, Ricca L, Pittau G, Vitale V, et al. Operative risks of domino liver transplantation for the familial amyloid polyneuropathy liver donor and recipient: a double analysis. Am J Transplant 2011;11:759–766.
Oken AC, Frank SM, Merritt WT, Fair J, Klein A, Burdick J, et al. A new percutaneous technique for establishing venous bypass access in orthotopic liver transplantation. J CardiothoracVasc Anesth 1994;8:58–60.
Gurusamy KS, Koti R, Pamecha V, Davidson BR. Veno‐venous bypass versus none for liver transplantation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;3:CD007712.
Hoffmann K, Weigand MA, Hillebrand N, Büchler MW, Schmidt J, Schemmer P. Is veno‐venous bypass still needed during liver transplantation? A review of the literature. Clin Transplant 2009;23:1–8.
Nishida S, Nakamura N, Vaidya A, Levi DM, Kato T, Nery JR, et al. Piggyback technique in adult orthotopic liver transplantation: an analysis of 1067 liver transplants at a single center. HPB (Oxford) 2006;8:182–188.
Cabezuelo JB, Ramirez P, Acosta F, Torres D, Sansano T, Pons JA, et al. Does the standard vs piggyback surgical technique affect the development of early acute renal failure after orthotopic liver transplantation? Transpl Proc 2003;35:1913–1914.
Hesse UJ, Berrevoet F, Troisi R, Pattyn P, Mortier E, Decruyenaere J, de Hemptinne B. Hepato‐venous reconstruction in orthotopic liver transplantation with preservation of the recipients’ inferior vena cava and veno‐venous bypass. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2000;385:350–356.
Wang MY, Wang MH, Peng Y, You HB, Chen XF, Zhao L, et al. Cannulation selection of portal venous and splenic venous catheterization in venovenous bypass of swine orthotopic liver transplantation. Ann Transplant 2016;21:346–349.

Auteurs

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH