Social ecological factors associated with physical activity and screen time amongst mothers from disadvantaged neighbourhoods over three years.


Journal

The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity
ISSN: 1479-5868
Titre abrégé: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101217089

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
28 08 2020
Historique:
received: 09 02 2020
accepted: 20 08 2020
entrez: 30 8 2020
pubmed: 30 8 2020
medline: 29 12 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Mothers from socioeconomically disadvantaged neighbourhoods are at elevated risk of physical inactivity and high levels of screen time. Yet, little is known regarding the social ecological factors that are longitudinally associated with physical activity and screen time in this target group, and whether the age of their children impacts these relationships. This study aimed to longitudinally examine the social ecological factors associated with physical activity and screen time amongst mothers living in socioeconomically disadvantaged neighbourhoods, and whether these differed according to their child's age. Data were from 895 mothers living in socioeconomically disadvantaged neighbourhoods (mean age 36.7 years) at baseline and three-year follow-up. Mothers self-reported weekly discretionary physical activity (leisure-time, LTPA; transport-related, TRPA) and screen time durations. Linear regression models assessed associations between five intrapersonal, three social and five physical environmental factors and LTPA, TRPA and screen time, adjusting for confounding factors, clustering by neighbourhood and baseline variables. Interaction analysis was conducted for age of children (younger and older children (n = 442) and mothers with older children (aged 5-12 years) only (n = 453). In adjusted models, all intrapersonal factors (self-efficacy, enjoyment, outcome expectations, behavioural intentions and behavioural skill), social support from friends, neighbourhood cohesion and number of televisions were longitudinally associated with LTPA amongst all mothers. Interaction models showed that findings were generally consistent across groups (i.e., those with both younger and older children compared to those with older children only), with three exceptions. Physical activity enjoyment and social support from family were associated with LTPA only among mothers with older children. Neighbourhood cohesion was associated with screen time only amongst mothers with both younger and older children. No associations were detected for TRPA. Intrapersonal, social and physical environmental factors were longitudinally associated with mother's LTPA, whilst neighbourhood cohesion was longitudinally associated with screen time behaviours amongst mothers. Interventions aimed at increasing LTPA amongst mothers (particularly those from socioeconomically disadvantaged neighbourhoods) may need to target all domains of the social ecological model and may require some tailoring according to the age of children. Further work is needed to identify longitudinal associations with screen time and TRPA in this population group.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Mothers from socioeconomically disadvantaged neighbourhoods are at elevated risk of physical inactivity and high levels of screen time. Yet, little is known regarding the social ecological factors that are longitudinally associated with physical activity and screen time in this target group, and whether the age of their children impacts these relationships. This study aimed to longitudinally examine the social ecological factors associated with physical activity and screen time amongst mothers living in socioeconomically disadvantaged neighbourhoods, and whether these differed according to their child's age.
METHODS
Data were from 895 mothers living in socioeconomically disadvantaged neighbourhoods (mean age 36.7 years) at baseline and three-year follow-up. Mothers self-reported weekly discretionary physical activity (leisure-time, LTPA; transport-related, TRPA) and screen time durations. Linear regression models assessed associations between five intrapersonal, three social and five physical environmental factors and LTPA, TRPA and screen time, adjusting for confounding factors, clustering by neighbourhood and baseline variables. Interaction analysis was conducted for age of children (younger and older children (n = 442) and mothers with older children (aged 5-12 years) only (n = 453).
RESULTS
In adjusted models, all intrapersonal factors (self-efficacy, enjoyment, outcome expectations, behavioural intentions and behavioural skill), social support from friends, neighbourhood cohesion and number of televisions were longitudinally associated with LTPA amongst all mothers. Interaction models showed that findings were generally consistent across groups (i.e., those with both younger and older children compared to those with older children only), with three exceptions. Physical activity enjoyment and social support from family were associated with LTPA only among mothers with older children. Neighbourhood cohesion was associated with screen time only amongst mothers with both younger and older children. No associations were detected for TRPA.
CONCLUSION
Intrapersonal, social and physical environmental factors were longitudinally associated with mother's LTPA, whilst neighbourhood cohesion was longitudinally associated with screen time behaviours amongst mothers. Interventions aimed at increasing LTPA amongst mothers (particularly those from socioeconomically disadvantaged neighbourhoods) may need to target all domains of the social ecological model and may require some tailoring according to the age of children. Further work is needed to identify longitudinal associations with screen time and TRPA in this population group.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32859233
doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-01015-5
pii: 10.1186/s12966-020-01015-5
pmc: PMC7456370
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

110

Références

Women Health. 2017 Apr;57(4):446-462
pubmed: 27014957
Prev Med. 1987 Nov;16(6):825-36
pubmed: 3432232
Women Health. 2002;36(2):29-41
pubmed: 12487139
Prev Med. 2014 Jul;64:1-7
pubmed: 24657548
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Jun;70(12):2011-2018
pubmed: 20362380
Health Promot Int. 2006 Jun;21(2):104-12
pubmed: 16641132
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2008 Mar-Apr;37(2):203-13
pubmed: 18336444
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e37696
pubmed: 22719846
Am J Prev Med. 2011 Aug;41(2):207-15
pubmed: 21767729
Eur J Sport Sci. 2019 Jun;19(5):696-706
pubmed: 30551727
Ann Behav Med. 2007 Feb;33(1):29-38
pubmed: 17291168
Am Psychol. 1992 Jan;47(1):6-22
pubmed: 1539925
Epidemiology. 2007 Nov;18(6):800-4
pubmed: 18049194
PLoS One. 2016 May 18;11(5):e0155696
pubmed: 27191953
J Health Psychol. 2016 Jul;21(7):1351-60
pubmed: 27357921
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jun 19;15:513
pubmed: 26088005
Am J Public Health. 2003 Sep;93(9):1583-9
pubmed: 12948984
Am J Prev Med. 2003 Aug;25(2):140-3
pubmed: 12880882
Women Health. 2005;42(4):63-82
pubmed: 16782676
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 25;11(1):e0147735
pubmed: 26808440
J Occup Environ Med. 2018 Jan;60(1):44-47
pubmed: 28902658
Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Dec;42(6):1629-39
pubmed: 23255533
Health Psychol. 2003 Mar;22(2):178-88
pubmed: 12683738
Psychol Health. 2016;31(4):456-69
pubmed: 26541890
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 Feb;61(2):108-14
pubmed: 17234868
Women Health. 2002;36(2):111-21
pubmed: 12487144
Women Health. 2014;54(3):212-31
pubmed: 24512572
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Aug;35(8):1381-95
pubmed: 12900694
Res Q Exerc Sport. 1992 Mar;63(1):60-6
pubmed: 1574662
Int J Behav Med. 2010 Dec;17(4):246-54
pubmed: 20174982
Orthop Nurs. 2006 Jan-Feb;25(1):22-9
pubmed: 16465109
Prev Med. 2008 Feb;46(2):99-110
pubmed: 17919713
Health Educ Behav. 2017 Dec;44(6):845-856
pubmed: 28142286
Prev Med. 2014 Jan;58:53-7
pubmed: 24220100
SSM Popul Health. 2016 Sep 28;2:718-723
pubmed: 29349183
Am J Epidemiol. 2007 Apr 15;165(8):858-67
pubmed: 17329713
Science. 1997 Aug 15;277(5328):918-24
pubmed: 9252316
Prev Med. 2012 Oct;55(4):315-318
pubmed: 22890022
J Behav Med. 2016 Aug;39(4):599-609
pubmed: 27108160
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2011 Apr;35(2):151-8
pubmed: 21463412
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2010 Dec;34(6):620-3
pubmed: 21134066
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012 Apr 13;9:42
pubmed: 22500882
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Oct;6(10):e1077-e1086
pubmed: 30193830
Women Health. 2012;52(6):606-19
pubmed: 22860706
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Aug;63(4):1011-22
pubmed: 16650513
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2016 Sep;87(3):311-7
pubmed: 27314751

Auteurs

Kylie A Morris (KA)

Geelong, Australia, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Melbourne Burwood Campus, 221 Burwood Hwy, Burwood, VIC, 3125, Australia. k.morris@deakin.edu.au.

Lauren Arundell (L)

Geelong, Australia, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.

Verity Cleland (V)

Geelong, Australia, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.
Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.

Megan Teychenne (M)

Geelong, Australia, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH