Comprehensive analysis of diverse low-grade neuroepithelial tumors with FGFR1 alterations reveals a distinct molecular signature of rosette-forming glioneuronal tumor.
DNA methylation profiling
Dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor (DNT)
Extraventricular neurocytoma (EVN)
FGFR1
Molecular neuropathology
PIK3CA
PIK3R1
Pilocytic astrocytoma
Rosette-forming glioneuronal tumor (RGNT)
Journal
Acta neuropathologica communications
ISSN: 2051-5960
Titre abrégé: Acta Neuropathol Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101610673
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 08 2020
28 08 2020
Historique:
received:
31
07
2020
accepted:
19
08
2020
entrez:
30
8
2020
pubmed:
30
8
2020
medline:
1
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The FGFR1 gene encoding fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 has emerged as a frequently altered oncogene in the pathogenesis of multiple low-grade neuroepithelial tumor (LGNET) subtypes including pilocytic astrocytoma, dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor (DNT), rosette-forming glioneuronal tumor (RGNT), and extraventricular neurocytoma (EVN). These activating FGFR1 alterations in LGNET can include tandem duplication of the exons encoding the intracellular tyrosine kinase domain, in-frame gene fusions most often with TACC1 as the partner, or hotspot missense mutations within the tyrosine kinase domain (either at p.N546 or p.K656). However, the specificity of these different FGFR1 events for the various LGNET subtypes and accompanying genetic alterations are not well defined. Here we performed comprehensive genomic and epigenomic characterization on a diverse cohort of 30 LGNET with FGFR1 alterations. We identified that RGNT harbors a distinct epigenetic signature compared to other LGNET with FGFR1 alterations, and is uniquely characterized by FGFR1 kinase domain hotspot missense mutations in combination with either PIK3CA or PIK3R1 mutation, often with accompanying NF1 or PTPN11 mutation. In contrast, EVN harbors its own distinct epigenetic signature and is characterized by FGFR1-TACC1 fusion as the solitary pathogenic alteration. Additionally, DNT and pilocytic astrocytoma are characterized by either kinase domain tandem duplication or hotspot missense mutations, occasionally with accompanying NF1 or PTPN11 mutation, but lacking the accompanying PIK3CA or PIK3R1 mutation that characterizes RGNT. The glial component of LGNET with FGFR1 alterations typically has a predominantly oligodendroglial morphology, and many of the pilocytic astrocytomas with FGFR1 alterations lack the biphasic pattern, piloid processes, and Rosenthal fibers that characterize pilocytic astrocytomas with BRAF mutation or fusion. Together, this analysis improves the classification and histopathologic stratification of LGNET with FGFR1 alterations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32859279
doi: 10.1186/s40478-020-01027-z
pii: 10.1186/s40478-020-01027-z
pmc: PMC7456392
doi:
Substances chimiques
FGFR1 protein, human
EC 2.7.10.1
Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 1
EC 2.7.10.1
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
151Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA227136
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R01 NS079697
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : T32 CA128583
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P50 CA097257
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : DP5 OD021403
Pays : United States
Références
Science. 2012 Sep 7;337(6099):1231-5
pubmed: 22837387
Acta Neuropathol. 2020 Feb;139(2):403-406
pubmed: 31729570
Acta Neuropathol. 2013 Aug;126(2):291-301
pubmed: 23660940
Nat Genet. 2013 Jun;45(6):602-12
pubmed: 23583981
Nat Genet. 2013 Aug;45(8):927-32
pubmed: 23817572
Science. 2013 Mar 29;339(6127):1546-58
pubmed: 23539594
Neuro Oncol. 2020 May 15;:
pubmed: 32413119
Brain Pathol. 2019 Jan;29(1):85-96
pubmed: 30051528
Acta Neuropathol. 2018 Aug;136(2):239-253
pubmed: 29766299
Cell. 2013 Oct 10;155(2):462-77
pubmed: 24120142
J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2015 Jul;74(7):743-54
pubmed: 26083571
Acta Neuropathol. 2019 Sep;138(3):497-504
pubmed: 31250151
J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2019 Dec 1;78(12):1100-1111
pubmed: 31617914
Brain Pathol. 2020 May;30(3):479-494
pubmed: 31609499
Genome Biol. 2014 Dec 03;15(12):503
pubmed: 25599564
Neuro Oncol. 2017 May 1;19(5):699-709
pubmed: 28453743
Acta Neuropathol. 2018 Jan;135(1):115-129
pubmed: 29058119
Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2018 Jun 7;6(1):47
pubmed: 29880043
Bioinformatics. 2014 May 15;30(10):1363-9
pubmed: 24478339
Brain Pathol. 2018 Jan;28(1):87-93
pubmed: 27893178
Acta Neuropathol. 2019 May;137(5):837-846
pubmed: 30759284
Acta Neuropathol. 2018 Aug;136(2):273-291
pubmed: 29564591
Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud. 2018 Apr 2;4(2):
pubmed: 29610389
Brain Pathol. 2018 Sep;28(5):674-683
pubmed: 28976058
Cancer Cell. 2017 Oct 9;32(4):520-537.e5
pubmed: 28966033
Neuro Oncol. 2019 Jun 10;21(6):800-808
pubmed: 30726976
Nature. 2017 Jul 19;547(7663):311-317
pubmed: 28726821
Acta Neuropathol. 2018 Aug;136(2):293-302
pubmed: 29978331
Acta Neuropathol. 2018 Mar;135(3):485-488
pubmed: 29428973
Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud. 2016 Sep;2(5):a001057
pubmed: 27626068
Nature. 2018 Mar 22;555(7697):469-474
pubmed: 29539639
J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2014 Jun;73(6):580-4
pubmed: 24806303
Acta Neuropathol. 2012 Feb;123(2):285-7
pubmed: 21997360
Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Apr;41(7):e90
pubmed: 23476028
Nat Commun. 2018 Feb 23;9(1):810
pubmed: 29476136
Brain Pathol. 2017 Sep;27(5):580-589
pubmed: 27608415
Cancer Cell. 2020 Apr 13;37(4):569-583.e5
pubmed: 32289278
Acta Neuropathol. 2017 Mar;133(3):417-429
pubmed: 27812792
Neuro Oncol. 2020 Apr 03;:
pubmed: 32242226
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 25;372(26):2481-98
pubmed: 26061751
Acta Neuropathol. 2016 Jun;131(6):833-45
pubmed: 26810070
Acta Neuropathol. 2016 Jun;131(6):903-10
pubmed: 26671409
Acta Neuropathol. 2016 Jun;131(6):847-63
pubmed: 26920151