Cardiovascular/stroke risk prevention: A new machine learning framework integrating carotid ultrasound image-based phenotypes and its harmonics with conventional risk factors.
10-Year measurements
AtheroRisk-conventional
AtheroRisk-integrated
Atherosclerosis
Carotid
Conventional risk factors
Covariates
Features
Harmonics
Image-based phenotypes
Ultrasound
Journal
Indian heart journal
ISSN: 2213-3763
Titre abrégé: Indian Heart J
Pays: India
ID NLM: 0374675
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
received:
09
05
2019
revised:
29
05
2020
accepted:
10
06
2020
entrez:
31
8
2020
pubmed:
31
8
2020
medline:
1
4
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Machine learning (ML)-based stroke risk stratification systems have typically focused on conventional risk factors (CRF) (AtheroRisk-conventional). Besides CRF, carotid ultrasound image phenotypes (CUSIP) have shown to be powerful phenotypes risk stratification. This is the first ML study of its kind that integrates CUSIP and CRF for risk stratification (AtheroRisk-integrated) and compares against AtheroRisk-conventional. Two types of ML-based setups called (i) AtheroRisk-integrated and (ii) AtheroRisk-conventional were developed using random forest (RF) classifiers. AtheroRisk-conventional uses a feature set of 13 CRF such as age, gender, hemoglobin A1c, fasting blood sugar, low-density lipoprotein, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, total cholesterol (TC), a ratio of TC and HDL, hypertension, smoking, family history, triglyceride, and ultrasound-based carotid plaque score. AtheroRisk-integrated system uses the feature set of 38 features with a combination of 13 CRF and 25 CUSIP features (6 types of current CUSIP, 6 types of 10-year CUSIP, 12 types of quadratic CUSIP (harmonics), and age-adjusted grayscale median). Logistic regression approach was used to select the significant features on which the RF classifier was trained. The performance of both ML systems was evaluated by area-under-the-curve (AUC) statistics computed using a leave-one-out cross-validation protocol. Left and right common carotid arteries of 202 Japanese patients were retrospectively examined to obtain 404 ultrasound scans. RF classifier showed higher improvement in AUC (~57%) for leave-one-out cross-validation protocol. Using RF classifier, AUC statistics for AtheroRisk-integrated system was higher (AUC = 0.99,p-value<0.001) compared to AtheroRisk-conventional (AUC = 0.63,p-value<0.001). The AtheroRisk-integrated ML system outperforms the AtheroRisk-conventional ML system using RF classifier.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32861380
pii: S0019-4832(20)30132-2
doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2020.06.004
pmc: PMC7474133
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
258-264Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Cardiological Society of India. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Références
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2019 Jan 25;21(2):7
pubmed: 30684090
Echocardiography. 2012 Oct;29(9):1111-9
pubmed: 22748012
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2019 May 1;21(7):25
pubmed: 31041615
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2010 May;57(5):1112-24
pubmed: 20442021
Med Phys. 2012 Jul;39(7):4255-64
pubmed: 22830759
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 4;12(4):e0174944
pubmed: 28376093
Eur Heart J. 2011 Jul;32(14):1769-818
pubmed: 21712404
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2018 May 21;20(7):33
pubmed: 29781047
IEEE Trans Image Process. 2012 Mar;21(3):1211-22
pubmed: 21947523
Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2020 Mar 1;25:1132-1171
pubmed: 32114427
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2013 Jun;227(6):643-54
pubmed: 23636747
Curr Opin Lipidol. 2014 Aug;25(4):254-65
pubmed: 24977979
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2019 Oct;9(5):420-430
pubmed: 31737514
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017 May 1;56(5):777-786
pubmed: 28087832
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2019 Jul;57(7):1553-1566
pubmed: 30989577
Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 Nov;22(11):2181-90
pubmed: 17076979
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2012 Jun;38(6):899-915
pubmed: 22502883
Circ J. 2018 Jun 25;82(7):1805-1812
pubmed: 29709892
Circulation. 2002 Jul 16;106(3):388-91
pubmed: 12119259
Eur J Radiol. 2012 May;81(5):911-8
pubmed: 21429684
Eur Heart J. 2007 Sep;28(17):2094-101
pubmed: 17597051
Heart. 2008 Oct;94(10):1331-2
pubmed: 18701534
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Nov 20;7(22):e009476
pubmed: 30571498
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 7;12(4):e0175605
pubmed: 28388688
Int Angiol. 2012 Feb;31(1):42-53
pubmed: 22330624
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018 Sep;143:322-331
pubmed: 30059757
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 01;9(10):e106455
pubmed: 25271417
Diabetes Care. 2007 May;30(5):1292-3
pubmed: 17290036
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jul 1;63(25 Pt B):2935-2959
pubmed: 24239921
Int Angiol. 2020 Mar 26;:
pubmed: 32214072
Diabetes Metab J. 2015 Aug;39(4):321-7
pubmed: 26301194
Comput Biol Med. 2019 Feb;105:125-143
pubmed: 30641308