Systematic review of patient reported outcomes (PROs) and quality of life measures after pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC).
PIPAC
PRO
Patient reported outcome
Peritoneal metastasis
Quality of life
Journal
Surgical oncology
ISSN: 1879-3320
Titre abrégé: Surg Oncol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9208188
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Dec 2020
Historique:
received:
01
06
2020
revised:
23
07
2020
accepted:
17
08
2020
pubmed:
31
8
2020
medline:
9
10
2021
entrez:
31
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) constitutes a recently described surgical technique to administer chemotherapy directly to the peritoneum, under pressure, for patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM). The purpose of an oncological treatment is to improve survival but without altering the patient's quality of life. The aim of this review was to evaluate patient-reported outcomes (PRO) after PIPAC for patients with PM. This systematic review was performed based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Between January 1, 2013, and January 1, 2020, studies were selected according to the following criteria: "pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy" OR "PIPAC" AND "patient-reported outcomes" OR "PRO" OR "Quality of life". In this review, 959 PIPAC and five PITAC (Pressurized IntraThoracic Aerosol Chemotherapy) were performed in 425 patients. We highlight the prominent application of generic EORTC QLQ-C30 followed by SF-36 in this review. The PROs according to the EORTC-QLQ-C30 global health score and based on symptom and function scores were stable across most studies. Moreover, PIPAC has improved the PRO of altered patients in two studies. Among 425 patients, the mortality rate was 0.7% and adverse events of Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events grade 3 and grade 4 were 9.6% and 1.6%, respectively. We synthesised current research on PROs among patients with PM. This review increases our understanding of the PIPAC strategy from the patient perspective. The implementation of PROs can be complex but will be essential in delivering quality care.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32862112
pii: S0960-7404(20)30362-5
doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2020.08.012
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Aerosols
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
97-105Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.