Chest CT in patients with a moderate or high pretest probability of COVID-19 and negative swab.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Area Under Curve
Betacoronavirus
COVID-19
Chi-Square Distribution
Coronavirus Infections
/ diagnosis
False Negative Reactions
False Positive Reactions
Female
Humans
Italy
/ epidemiology
Lung
/ diagnostic imaging
Male
Middle Aged
Nasopharynx
/ virology
Pandemics
Pneumonia, Viral
/ diagnosis
Predictive Value of Tests
Probability
Radiography, Thoracic
/ methods
Reference Standards
Reproducibility of Results
Retrospective Studies
Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
/ statistics & numerical data
SARS-CoV-2
Sensitivity and Specificity
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
/ statistics & numerical data
COVID-19
Computed tomography
Nasopharyngeal swab
RT-PCR
Journal
La Radiologia medica
ISSN: 1826-6983
Titre abrégé: Radiol Med
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 0177625
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Dec 2020
Historique:
received:
04
06
2020
accepted:
16
08
2020
pubmed:
31
8
2020
medline:
20
11
2020
entrez:
31
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of CT in patients with a negative first RT-PCR testing and to identify typical features of COVID-19 pneumonia that can guide diagnosis in this case. Patients suspected of COVID-19 with a negative first RT-PCR testing were retrospectively revalued after undergoing CT. CT was reviewed by two radiologists and classified as suspected COVID-19 pneumonia, non-COVID-19 pneumonia or negative. The performance of both first RT-PCR result and CT was evaluated by using sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and area under the curve (AUC) and by using the second RT-PCR test as the reference standard. CT findings for confirmed COVID-19 positive or negative were compared by using the Pearson chi-squared test (P values < 0.05) RESULTS: Totally, 337 patients suspected of COVID-19 underwent CT and nasopharyngeal swabs in March 2020. Eighty-seven out of 337 patients had a negative first RT-PCR result; of these, 68 repeated RT-PCR testing and were included in the study. The first RT-PCR test showed SE 0, SP = 100%, PPV = NaN, NPV = 70%, AUC = 50%, and CT showed SE = 70% SP = 79%, PPV = 86%, NPV = 76%, AUC = 75%. The most relevant CT variables were ground glass opacity more than 50% and peripheral and/or perihilar distribution. Negative RT-PCR test but positive CT features should be highly suggestive of COVID-19 in a cluster or community transmission scenarios, and the second RT-PCR test should be promptly requested to confirm the final diagnosis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32862406
doi: 10.1007/s11547-020-01269-w
pii: 10.1007/s11547-020-01269-w
pmc: PMC7456362
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1260-1270Références
J Emerg Med. 2009 Apr;36(3):266-70
pubmed: 18571356
Radiology. 2020 Aug;296(2):E79-E85
pubmed: 32243238
J Thorac Imaging. 2020 Jul;35(4):219-227
pubmed: 32324653
Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2020 Feb 13;2(1):e200034
pubmed: 33778547
Radiographics. 2018 May-Jun;38(3):719-739
pubmed: 29757717
Infect Dis Rep. 2020 Mar 16;12(1):8543
pubmed: 32218915
Radiology. 2020 Aug;296(2):E32-E40
pubmed: 32101510
Radiology. 2020 Sep;296(3):E145-E155
pubmed: 32301646
Radiology. 2020 Aug;296(2):E115-E117
pubmed: 32073353
Radiology. 2020 Aug;296(2):E113-E114
pubmed: 32105562
Korean J Radiol. 2020 Apr;21(4):494-500
pubmed: 32100485
Radiology. 2020 Apr;295(1):202-207
pubmed: 32017661
Radiology. 2020 Jul;296(1):172-180
pubmed: 32255413
J Med Virol. 2020 Sep;92(9):1525-1532
pubmed: 32167181
Radiology. 2011 Jul;260(1):18-39
pubmed: 21697307
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Apr;20(4):425-434
pubmed: 32105637
Radiology. 2020 Jun;295(3):200463
pubmed: 32077789
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 Jul;215(1):121-126
pubmed: 32174128
Radiology. 2020 Jun;295(3):715-721
pubmed: 32053470
Radiology. 2020 Aug;296(2):E41-E45
pubmed: 32049601