Risk of hydroxychloroquine alone and in combination with azithromycin in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a multinational, retrospective study.
Journal
The Lancet. Rheumatology
ISSN: 2665-9913
Titre abrégé: Lancet Rheumatol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101765308
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2020
Nov 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
31
8
2020
medline:
31
8
2020
entrez:
1
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Hydroxychloroquine, a drug commonly used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, has received much negative publicity for adverse events associated with its authorisation for emergency use to treat patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. We studied the safety of hydroxychloroquine, alone and in combination with azithromycin, to determine the risk associated with its use in routine care in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. In this multinational, retrospective study, new user cohort studies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis aged 18 years or older and initiating hydroxychloroquine were compared with those initiating sulfasalazine and followed up over 30 days, with 16 severe adverse events studied. Self-controlled case series were done to further establish safety in wider populations, and included all users of hydroxychloroquine regardless of rheumatoid arthritis status or indication. Separately, severe adverse events associated with hydroxychloroquine plus azithromycin (compared with hydroxychloroquine plus amoxicillin) were studied. Data comprised 14 sources of claims data or electronic medical records from Germany, Japan, the Netherlands, Spain, the UK, and the USA. Propensity score stratification and calibration using negative control outcomes were used to address confounding. Cox models were fitted to estimate calibrated hazard ratios (HRs) according to drug use. Estimates were pooled where the The study included 956 374 users of hydroxychloroquine, 310 350 users of sulfasalazine, 323 122 users of hydroxychloroquine plus azithromycin, and 351 956 users of hydroxychloroquine plus amoxicillin. No excess risk of severe adverse events was identified when 30-day hydroxychloroquine and sulfasalazine use were compared. Self-controlled case series confirmed these findings. However, long-term use of hydroxychloroquine appeared to be associated with increased cardiovascular mortality (calibrated HR 1·65 [95% CI 1·12-2·44]). Addition of azithromycin appeared to be associated with an increased risk of 30-day cardiovascular mortality (calibrated HR 2·19 [95% CI 1·22-3·95]), chest pain or angina (1·15 [1·05-1·26]), and heart failure (1·22 [1·02-1·45]). Hydroxychloroquine treatment appears to have no increased risk in the short term among patients with rheumatoid arthritis, but in the long term it appears to be associated with excess cardiovascular mortality. The addition of azithromycin increases the risk of heart failure and cardiovascular mortality even in the short term. We call for careful consideration of the benefit-risk trade-off when counselling those on hydroxychloroquine treatment. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, NIHR Senior Research Fellowship programme, US National Institutes of Health, US Department of Veterans Affairs, Janssen Research and Development, IQVIA, Korea Health Industry Development Institute through the Ministry of Health and Welfare Republic of Korea, Versus Arthritis, UK Medical Research Council Doctoral Training Partnership, Foundation Alfonso Martin Escudero, Innovation Fund Denmark, Novo Nordisk Foundation, Singapore Ministry of Health's National Medical Research Council Open Fund Large Collaborative Grant, VINCI, Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking, EU's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme, and European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Hydroxychloroquine, a drug commonly used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, has received much negative publicity for adverse events associated with its authorisation for emergency use to treat patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. We studied the safety of hydroxychloroquine, alone and in combination with azithromycin, to determine the risk associated with its use in routine care in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
METHODS
METHODS
In this multinational, retrospective study, new user cohort studies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis aged 18 years or older and initiating hydroxychloroquine were compared with those initiating sulfasalazine and followed up over 30 days, with 16 severe adverse events studied. Self-controlled case series were done to further establish safety in wider populations, and included all users of hydroxychloroquine regardless of rheumatoid arthritis status or indication. Separately, severe adverse events associated with hydroxychloroquine plus azithromycin (compared with hydroxychloroquine plus amoxicillin) were studied. Data comprised 14 sources of claims data or electronic medical records from Germany, Japan, the Netherlands, Spain, the UK, and the USA. Propensity score stratification and calibration using negative control outcomes were used to address confounding. Cox models were fitted to estimate calibrated hazard ratios (HRs) according to drug use. Estimates were pooled where the
FINDINGS
RESULTS
The study included 956 374 users of hydroxychloroquine, 310 350 users of sulfasalazine, 323 122 users of hydroxychloroquine plus azithromycin, and 351 956 users of hydroxychloroquine plus amoxicillin. No excess risk of severe adverse events was identified when 30-day hydroxychloroquine and sulfasalazine use were compared. Self-controlled case series confirmed these findings. However, long-term use of hydroxychloroquine appeared to be associated with increased cardiovascular mortality (calibrated HR 1·65 [95% CI 1·12-2·44]). Addition of azithromycin appeared to be associated with an increased risk of 30-day cardiovascular mortality (calibrated HR 2·19 [95% CI 1·22-3·95]), chest pain or angina (1·15 [1·05-1·26]), and heart failure (1·22 [1·02-1·45]).
INTERPRETATION
CONCLUSIONS
Hydroxychloroquine treatment appears to have no increased risk in the short term among patients with rheumatoid arthritis, but in the long term it appears to be associated with excess cardiovascular mortality. The addition of azithromycin increases the risk of heart failure and cardiovascular mortality even in the short term. We call for careful consideration of the benefit-risk trade-off when counselling those on hydroxychloroquine treatment.
FUNDING
BACKGROUND
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, NIHR Senior Research Fellowship programme, US National Institutes of Health, US Department of Veterans Affairs, Janssen Research and Development, IQVIA, Korea Health Industry Development Institute through the Ministry of Health and Welfare Republic of Korea, Versus Arthritis, UK Medical Research Council Doctoral Training Partnership, Foundation Alfonso Martin Escudero, Innovation Fund Denmark, Novo Nordisk Foundation, Singapore Ministry of Health's National Medical Research Council Open Fund Large Collaborative Grant, VINCI, Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking, EU's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme, and European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32864627
doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(20)30276-9
pii: S2665-9913(20)30276-9
pmc: PMC7442425
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e698-e711Subventions
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : P30 AG059307
Pays : United States
Organisme : NLM NIH HHS
ID : R01 LM006910
Pays : United States
Organisme : ORD VA
ID : RES 13-457
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Références
Control Clin Trials. 1986 Sep;7(3):177-88
pubmed: 3802833
Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2012 Sep;8(9):522-33
pubmed: 22801982
Cell Res. 2020 Mar;30(3):269-271
pubmed: 32020029
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020 May;55(5):105938
pubmed: 32171740
Pharmazie. 2010 Sep;65(9):631-40
pubmed: 21038838
JAMA. 2007 Jul 11;298(2):187-93
pubmed: 17622600
Arthritis Rheum. 2010 Mar;62(3):855-62
pubmed: 20131238
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2015 Jul;54(7):1244-9
pubmed: 25587177
Stat Med. 2016 Sep 30;35(22):3883-8
pubmed: 27592566
Trends Microbiol. 2007 May;15(5):211-8
pubmed: 17398101
ACM Trans Model Comput Simul. 2013 Jan;23(1):
pubmed: 25328363
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2015 Feb;14(2):295-303
pubmed: 25494485
Lancet Infect Dis. 2003 Nov;3(11):722-7
pubmed: 14592603
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Sep 1;5(9):1036-1041
pubmed: 32936252
Nat Med. 2020 Jun;26(6):808-809
pubmed: 32488217
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020 Jul;56(1):105949
pubmed: 32205204
N Engl J Med. 2012 May 17;366(20):1881-90
pubmed: 22591294
Drug Saf. 2018 Oct;41(10):919-931
pubmed: 29858838
Lupus. 2018 Apr;27(4):591-599
pubmed: 28992800
Stat Med. 2009 Nov 10;28(25):3083-107
pubmed: 19757444
Circulation. 2020 Jun 16;141(24):e906-e907
pubmed: 32267732
Lancet. 2019 Nov 16;394(10211):1816-1826
pubmed: 31668726
Int J Epidemiol. 2018 Dec 1;47(6):2005-2014
pubmed: 29939268
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Apr 24;3(4):e208857
pubmed: 32330277
Clin Ther. 2019 Jul;41(7):1376-1396
pubmed: 31196653
Stat Med. 2014 Jan 30;33(2):209-18
pubmed: 23900808
Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Jun;79(6):760-770
pubmed: 32033941
J Biomed Inform. 2017 Feb;66:72-81
pubmed: 27993747
Biometrics. 2013 Dec;69(4):893-902
pubmed: 24117144
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020 Apr;55(4):105932
pubmed: 32145363
Rheumatol Int. 1992;12(5):175-85
pubmed: 1290019