Building confidence in skin sensitisation potency assessment using new approach methodologies: report of the 3rd EPAA Partners Forum, Brussels, 28th October 2019.


Journal

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP
ISSN: 1096-0295
Titre abrégé: Regul Toxicol Pharmacol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8214983

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2020
Historique:
received: 07 04 2020
revised: 17 08 2020
accepted: 24 08 2020
pubmed: 1 9 2020
medline: 9 7 2021
entrez: 1 9 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Skin sensitising substances that induce contact allergy and consequently risk elicitation of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) remain an important focus regarding the replacement of animal experimentation. Current in vivo methods, notably the local lymph node assay (LLNA) refined and reduced animal usage and led to a marked improvement in hazard identification, characterisation and risk assessment. Since validation, regulatory confidence in the LLNA approach has evolved until it became the first choice assay in most regulated sectors. Currently, hazard identification using the LLNA is being actively replaced by a toolbox of non-animal approaches. However, there remains a need to increase confidence in the use of new approach methodologies (NAMs) as replacements for LLNA sensitiser potency estimation. The EPAA Partners Forum exchanged the current state of knowledge on use of NAMs in various industry sectors and regulatory environments. They then debated current challenges in this area and noted several ongoing needs. These included a requirement for reference standards for potency, better characterisation of applicability domains/technical limitations of NAMs, development of a framework for weight of evidence assessments, and an increased confidence in the characterisation of non-sensitisers. Finally, exploration of an industry/regulator cross-sector user-forum on skin sensitisation was recommended.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32866543
pii: S0273-2300(20)30193-8
doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104767
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Allergens 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

104767

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

D Basketter (D)

DABMEB Consultancy Ltd, Sharnbrook, UK. Electronic address: dabmebconsultancyltd@me.com.

S Beken (S)

European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

H Bender (H)

hjb Consulting, Bonn, Germany.

J Bridges (J)

University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.

S Casati (S)

European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy.

M Corvaro (M)

Corteva Agrisciences, Rome, Italy.

S Cuvellier (S)

COSMED, Aix-en-Provence, France.

B Hubesch (B)

Hubesch Consult BVBA, Sint-Pieters-Leeuw, Belgium; European Chemical Industry Council (Cefic), Brussels, Belgium.

A Irizar (A)

The International Fragrance Association (IFRA), Geneva, Switzerland.

M N Jacobs (MN)

Public Health England, Chilton, UK.

P Kern (P)

Procter and Gamble Services Company NV/SA, Strombeek-Bever, Belgium.

F Lamplmair (F)

European Commission, Brussels, Belgium.

I Manou (I)

European Partnership for Alternative Approaches to Animal Testing (EPAA), Brussels, Belgium.

B P Müller (BP)

Symrise AG, Holzminden, Germany.

R Roggeband (R)

Procter and Gamble Services Company NV/SA, Strombeek-Bever, Belgium.

L H Rossi (LH)

European Chemicals Agency, Helsinki, Finland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH