Activities of leaf and spike carbohydrate-metabolic and antioxidant enzymes are linked with yield performance in three spring wheat genotypes grown under well-watered and drought conditions.


Journal

BMC plant biology
ISSN: 1471-2229
Titre abrégé: BMC Plant Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967807

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
31 Aug 2020
Historique:
received: 10 02 2020
accepted: 27 07 2020
entrez: 2 9 2020
pubmed: 2 9 2020
medline: 20 2 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To improve our understanding about the physiological mechanism of grain yield reduction at anthesis, three spring wheat genotypes [L Compared to genotype L Distinct physiological markers correlating with yield traits and higher activity of leaf aldolase and cwPOX may be chosen as predictive biomarkers for higher TKW. Also, higher activity of MDHAR within the leaf can be selected as a predictive biomarker for higher NGS in wheat under drought. Whereas, lower activity of vacInv and GST both within leaf and spike can be selected as biomarkers for higher NGS and HI. The results highlighted the role of antioxidant and carbohydrate-metabolic enzymes in the modulation of source-sink balance in wheat crops, which could be used as bio-signatures for breeding and selection of drought-resilient wheat genotypes for a future drier climate.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
To improve our understanding about the physiological mechanism of grain yield reduction at anthesis, three spring wheat genotypes [L
RESULTS RESULTS
Compared to genotype L
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Distinct physiological markers correlating with yield traits and higher activity of leaf aldolase and cwPOX may be chosen as predictive biomarkers for higher TKW. Also, higher activity of MDHAR within the leaf can be selected as a predictive biomarker for higher NGS in wheat under drought. Whereas, lower activity of vacInv and GST both within leaf and spike can be selected as biomarkers for higher NGS and HI. The results highlighted the role of antioxidant and carbohydrate-metabolic enzymes in the modulation of source-sink balance in wheat crops, which could be used as bio-signatures for breeding and selection of drought-resilient wheat genotypes for a future drier climate.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32867688
doi: 10.1186/s12870-020-02581-3
pii: 10.1186/s12870-020-02581-3
pmc: PMC7457523
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antioxidants 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

400

Références

J Biol Chem. 1969 Nov 25;244(22):6049-55
pubmed: 5389100
Plant Physiol. 2000 May;123(1):223-34
pubmed: 10806239
Trends Plant Sci. 2004 Dec;9(12):606-13
pubmed: 15564128
Phytochemistry. 2001 Mar;56(5):407-15
pubmed: 11261572
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2013 Dec;73:93-8
pubmed: 24080395
Planta. 1990 Jan;180(2):278-84
pubmed: 24201957
Mol Biol (Mosk). 2008 Mar-Apr;42(2):206-13
pubmed: 18610828
J Exp Bot. 2012 May;63(8):3001-9
pubmed: 22323273
J Exp Bot. 2005 Jan;56(411):417-23
pubmed: 15569704
Plant J. 1999 May;18(3):285-92
pubmed: 10377994
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:9851095
pubmed: 27047966
Plant Cell Environ. 2008 Jan;31(1):11-38
pubmed: 17971069
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Apr 30;21(9):
pubmed: 32365765
Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 21;8(1):12527
pubmed: 30131572
Plant Physiol. 2004 Jul;135(3):1621-9
pubmed: 15235118
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Jun 14;8:1030
pubmed: 28659962
Planta. 2007 Apr;225(5):1255-64
pubmed: 17043889
Plant Physiol. 1989 Apr;89(4):1117-21
pubmed: 16666673
Plant Physiol. 1994 Sep;106(1):53-60
pubmed: 12232302
Planta. 2003 Feb;216(4):656-64
pubmed: 12569408
Plant Physiol. 1999 Sep;121(1):1-8
pubmed: 10482654
Planta. 2004 Dec;220(2):331-43
pubmed: 15290295
Plant Biotechnol J. 2017 Jul;15(7):805-816
pubmed: 27936496
J Cereal Sci. 2014 May;59(3):245-256
pubmed: 24882934
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Feb 5;99(3):1724-9
pubmed: 11830676
J Exp Bot. 2015 Feb;66(3):863-78
pubmed: 25392479
Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2011 Jul;13(4):632-42
pubmed: 21668604
J Plant Physiol. 2012 Feb 15;169(3):311-8
pubmed: 22024734
Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2014 Aug;173(8):2241-53
pubmed: 25008554
Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2015 Oct;21(4):551-8
pubmed: 26600681
Nat Biotechnol. 1997 Oct;15(10):988-91
pubmed: 9335051
J Exp Bot. 2012 Jan;63(1):215-27
pubmed: 21926094
Proteomics. 2006 Apr;6(7):2180-98
pubmed: 16502469
Plant Physiol. 2000 Sep;124(1):71-84
pubmed: 10982423
Plant Cell Environ. 2017 May;40(5):602-610
pubmed: 27642699
J Exp Bot. 2001 May;52(358):961-9
pubmed: 11432913
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Apr 24;15(5):
pubmed: 29695095
Plant Physiol. 1995 Sep;109(1):177-185
pubmed: 12228588
J Exp Bot. 2020 Jan 7;71(2):669-683
pubmed: 31087074
Plant Physiol. 2004 Mar;134(3):912-8
pubmed: 15020755
Plant Mol Biol. 2000 Nov;44(4):487-98
pubmed: 11197324
Plant Mol Biol. 2005 Dec;59(6):945-64
pubmed: 16307368
Plant Sci. 2011 Oct;181(4):331-41
pubmed: 21889038
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Aug 4;106(31):13124-9
pubmed: 19470642
Phytochemistry. 2001 Nov;58(6):841-7
pubmed: 11684180
Sci Rep. 2016 Sep 22;6:33903
pubmed: 27652777
Genet Mol Biol. 2016 Mar;39(1):1-6
pubmed: 27007891
J Exp Bot. 2015 Sep;66(18):5531-42
pubmed: 26002973
Ann Bot. 2002 Nov;90(5):607-12
pubmed: 12466101
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Nov 27;9:1705
pubmed: 30542357
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 18;9(7):e102917
pubmed: 25036550
Indian J Biochem Biophys. 2012 Aug;49(4):257-65
pubmed: 23077787
J Plant Physiol. 2008 Jun 16;165(9):903-10
pubmed: 18242768
Plant Cell. 1999 Apr;11(4):587-600
pubmed: 10213780
Front Microbiol. 2019 Aug 22;10:1937
pubmed: 31507556
J Exp Bot. 2019 Feb 20;70(4):1119-1140
pubmed: 30772919
Plant Physiol. 2010 Nov;154(3):1128-42
pubmed: 20841452
Planta. 2004 Sep;219(5):894-905
pubmed: 15179513
J Exp Bot. 2006;57(8):1759-68
pubmed: 16714303
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Jun;83(11):3811-5
pubmed: 16593704
Methods Enzymol. 1984;105:121-6
pubmed: 6727660
Plant Methods. 2020 Mar 21;16:42
pubmed: 32206082
Gene. 2012 Jul 15;503(1):65-74
pubmed: 22561114
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Dec 22;7:1912
pubmed: 28066469
Plant Physiol. 2010 Oct;154(2):744-56
pubmed: 20699399
Plant Physiol. 1998 Jul;117(3):997-1006
pubmed: 9662542
J Biol Chem. 2010 Jan 8;285(2):1138-46
pubmed: 19901034
Methods Enzymol. 2014;542:1-23
pubmed: 24862258

Auteurs

Sajid Shokat (S)

Crop Science, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Højbakkegård Allé 13, 2630, Taastrup, Denmark. S.shokat@plen.ku.dk.
Wheat Breeding Group, Plant Breeding and Genetic Division, Nuclear Institute for Agriculture and Biology, Faisalabad, 38000, Pakistan. S.shokat@plen.ku.dk.

Dominik K Großkinsky (DK)

Transport Biology, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Copenhagen Plant Science Centre, Thorvaldsensvej 40, 1871, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH, Center for Health and Bioresources, Bioresources Unit, Konrad-Lorenz-Straße 24, 3430, Tulln, Austria.

Thomas Roitsch (T)

Crop Science, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Højbakkegård Allé 13, 2630, Taastrup, Denmark.

Fulai Liu (F)

Crop Science, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Højbakkegård Allé 13, 2630, Taastrup, Denmark.

Articles similaires

Populus Soil Microbiology Soil Microbiota Fungi
Genome, Viral Ralstonia Composting Solanum lycopersicum Bacteriophages
Semiconductors Photosynthesis Polymers Carbon Dioxide Bacteria
Fragaria Light Plant Leaves Osmosis Stress, Physiological

Classifications MeSH