Perspectives of patients, relatives and nurses on rooming-in for adult patients: A scoping review of the literature.

Family participation Nursing Person-centered care Rooming-in Scoping review

Journal

Applied nursing research : ANR
ISSN: 1532-8201
Titre abrégé: Appl Nurs Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8901557

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 2020
Historique:
received: 05 03 2020
revised: 22 05 2020
accepted: 09 06 2020
pubmed: 2 9 2020
medline: 19 8 2021
entrez: 2 9 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To explore the perspectives of patients, their relatives and nurses on rooming-in for adult patients. The practice of having family stay overnight with an adult patient in hospital is quite new. To support rooming-in programs, the perspectives from all stakeholders should be taken into account. All types of studies on rooming-in in adult healthcare settings were included in this scoping review. Rooming-in has been defined as the practice where 'family members or trusted others are facilitated to continuously stay with the patient and are provided with facilities to sleep in the patient's room'. Seven studies were included: one randomized controlled trial, three qualitative studies, and three correspondence articles. Generally, patients felt safe in the presence of a family member, but could also feel restricted in their freedom and privacy. Family members saw a benefit for the patient, considered rooming-in a moral duty, and were happy to help. Nonetheless, family members reported rooming-in as physically and emotionally stressful. Nurses described that patients were less anxious and more easily adjusted to the hospital environment. The reviewed studies suggest that patients, family members, and nurses have both positive and negative experiences with rooming-in. The concept of rooming-in varies from continuous presence and involvement of relatives to one overnight stay in the patient's room. Each interpretation has its own implications for policy, design, guidelines and feasibility of rooming-in. Nursing staff should be included in decision-making processes for this practice.

Sections du résumé

AIM
To explore the perspectives of patients, their relatives and nurses on rooming-in for adult patients.
BACKGROUND
The practice of having family stay overnight with an adult patient in hospital is quite new. To support rooming-in programs, the perspectives from all stakeholders should be taken into account.
METHODS
All types of studies on rooming-in in adult healthcare settings were included in this scoping review. Rooming-in has been defined as the practice where 'family members or trusted others are facilitated to continuously stay with the patient and are provided with facilities to sleep in the patient's room'.
RESULTS
Seven studies were included: one randomized controlled trial, three qualitative studies, and three correspondence articles. Generally, patients felt safe in the presence of a family member, but could also feel restricted in their freedom and privacy. Family members saw a benefit for the patient, considered rooming-in a moral duty, and were happy to help. Nonetheless, family members reported rooming-in as physically and emotionally stressful. Nurses described that patients were less anxious and more easily adjusted to the hospital environment.
CONCLUSIONS
The reviewed studies suggest that patients, family members, and nurses have both positive and negative experiences with rooming-in. The concept of rooming-in varies from continuous presence and involvement of relatives to one overnight stay in the patient's room. Each interpretation has its own implications for policy, design, guidelines and feasibility of rooming-in. Nursing staff should be included in decision-making processes for this practice.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32868147
pii: S0897-1897(20)30156-7
doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2020.151320
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

151320

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest None.

Auteurs

Marianne J E van der Heijden (MJE)

Department of Internal Medicine, Nursing Science, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: m.j.e.vanderheijden@erasmusmc.nl.

Margo M C van Mol (MMC)

Department of Intensive Care Adults, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Erica F E Witkamp (EFE)

Faculty of Nursing and Research Center Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Robert Jan Osse (RJ)

Department of Psychiatry, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Erwin Ista (E)

Department of Internal Medicine, Nursing Science, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center - Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Monique van Dijk (M)

Department of Internal Medicine, Nursing Science, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center - Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH