Biotic rescaling reveals importance of species interactions for variation in biodiversity responses to climate change.

colonization context dependency extinction precipitation temperature

Journal

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
ISSN: 1091-6490
Titre abrégé: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7505876

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 09 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 2 9 2020
medline: 28 10 2020
entrez: 2 9 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Generality in understanding biodiversity responses to climate change has been hampered by substantial variation in the rates and even directions of response to a given change in climate. We propose that such context dependencies can be clarified by rescaling climate gradients in terms of the underlying biological processes, with biotic interactions as a particularly important process. We tested this rescaling approach in a replicated field experiment where entire montane grassland communities were transplanted in the direction of expected temperature and/or precipitation change. In line with earlier work, we found considerable variation across sites in community dynamics in response to climate change. However, these complex context dependencies could be substantially reduced or eliminated by rescaling climate drivers in terms of proxies of plant-plant interactions. Specifically, bryophytes limited colonization by new species into local communities, whereas the cover of those colonists, along with bryophytes, were the primary drivers of local extinctions. These specific interactions are relatively understudied, suggesting important directions for future work in similar systems. More generally, the success of our approach in explaining and simplifying landscape-level variation in climate change responses suggests that developing and testing proxies for relevant underlying processes could be a fruitful direction for building more general models of biodiversity response to climate change.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32868426
pii: 2003377117
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2003377117
pmc: PMC7502702
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

22858-22865

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : ErratumIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no competing interest.

Références

Science. 2004 Jun 11;304(5677):1629-33
pubmed: 15192218
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2013 Sep;1297:112-25
pubmed: 23876073
Nat Ecol Evol. 2020 Jul;4(7):927-933
pubmed: 32367031
Ecol Lett. 2006 Jul;9(7):780-8
pubmed: 16796567
Ann Bot. 2012 Jul;110(1):141-53
pubmed: 22589328
Nature. 2011 Oct 19;479(7374):517-20
pubmed: 22012261
Nature. 2015 Sep 24;525(7570):515-8
pubmed: 26374998
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Feb;24(2):563-579
pubmed: 29112781
Ecol Lett. 2013 May;16(5):695-706
pubmed: 23363430
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2013 Feb;88(1):15-30
pubmed: 22686347
Nature. 2009 Sep 10;461(7261):254-7
pubmed: 19675568
Glob Chang Biol. 2019 May;25(5):1839-1851
pubmed: 30801860
Trends Ecol Evol. 2015 Nov;30(11):673-684
pubmed: 26437633
Oecologia. 2010 Mar;162(3):733-45
pubmed: 19902260
Ecology. 2016 Oct;97(10):2791-2801
pubmed: 27859101
Ecol Lett. 2012 Feb;15(2):164-75
pubmed: 22136670
Nat Commun. 2017 Sep 4;8(1):419
pubmed: 28871154
Nature. 2018 Apr;556(7700):231-234
pubmed: 29618821
Science. 2012 Apr 20;336(6079):353-5
pubmed: 22517860
Glob Chang Biol. 2016 May;22(5):1915-26
pubmed: 26845378
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 19;10(6):e0130205
pubmed: 26091266
Science. 2016 Nov 11;354(6313):
pubmed: 27846577
Science. 2017 May 19;356(6339):742-744
pubmed: 28522532
Ecol Lett. 2006 Jul;9(7):767-73
pubmed: 16796565
Nature. 2016 Jan 14;529(7585):167-71
pubmed: 26700811
Ambio. 2020 Mar;49(3):678-692
pubmed: 30929249
Ann Bot. 2007 May;99(5):987-1001
pubmed: 17353205
Science. 2016 Sep 9;353(6304):
pubmed: 27609898
Ecol Lett. 2010 Aug 1;13(8):1019-29
pubmed: 20545729
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Sep 15;117(37):22858-22865
pubmed: 32868426
Nat Commun. 2016 Aug 26;7:12643
pubmed: 27561410
Oecologia. 2015 Oct;179(2):599-608
pubmed: 26065402
Glob Chang Biol. 2017 Sep;23(9):3921-3933
pubmed: 28161909
Nature. 2002 Jun 20;417(6891):844-8
pubmed: 12075350
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Oct;24(10):4657-4666
pubmed: 29851242
Sci Rep. 2014 Nov 04;4:6898
pubmed: 25367429
Trends Ecol Evol. 2016 Nov;31(11):831-841
pubmed: 27640784
New Phytol. 2011 Jun;190(4):1019-1031
pubmed: 21342202

Auteurs

Vigdis Vandvik (V)

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Bergen, 5008 Bergen, Norway; vigdis.vandvik@uib.no.
Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research, University of Bergen, 5008 Bergen, Norway.

Olav Skarpaas (O)

Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, N-0318 Oslo, Norway.
Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA) Oslo, Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, N-0349 Oslo, Norway.

Kari Klanderud (K)

Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, N-1432 Ås, Norway.

Richard J Telford (RJ)

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Bergen, 5008 Bergen, Norway.
Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research, University of Bergen, 5008 Bergen, Norway.

Aud H Halbritter (AH)

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Bergen, 5008 Bergen, Norway.
Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research, University of Bergen, 5008 Bergen, Norway.

Deborah E Goldberg (DE)

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48104.

Articles similaires

Humans Climate Change Health Personnel Surveys and Questionnaires Medical Oncology
Lakes Salinity Archaea Bacteria Microbiota
Rivers Turkey Biodiversity Environmental Monitoring Animals
1.00
Iran Environmental Monitoring Seasons Ecosystem Forests

Classifications MeSH