Relationship of prosthesis ownership and phantom limb pain: results of a survey in 2383 limb amputees.
Journal
Pain
ISSN: 1872-6623
Titre abrégé: Pain
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7508686
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 02 2021
01 02 2021
Historique:
received:
12
05
2020
accepted:
03
08
2020
pubmed:
2
9
2020
medline:
20
5
2021
entrez:
2
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Phantom limb pain (PLP) accounts for a significant reduction in quality of life and is difficult to treat. Prosthesis use has been shown to negatively covary with PLP. Recent research on body perception in amputees suggest that prosthesis ownership, defined as the extent to which a prosthesis is experienced as being part of the body rather than an artificial device foreign to the body, might interact with PLP. We used survey data from 2383 unilateral prosthesis-using upper-limb or lower-limb amputees and performed regression analyses to determine the relationship between prosthesis ownership and PLP. To test for specificity, we examined the role of prosthesis ownership also for residual limb pain (RLP) and nonpainful phantom limb sensations (npPLS). Prosthesis ownership was reduced in older participants and higher in lower-limb compared to upper-limb amputees. A longer residual limb and more frequent prosthesis use as well as a longer time since amputation also yielded higher values. Prostheses based on natural principles were associated with higher prosthesis ownership. Phantom limb pain and RLP were lower with higher prosthesis ownership, and RLP but not PLP was lower when prosthesis use was frequent. There were no significant associations for npPLS. The regression results differ in some aspects from those revealed by univariate analyses, emphasizing the importance of multivariate statistical approaches. Our findings provide insights into the interplay of body- and pain-related sensations after amputation, and could help to develop new treatment approaches for both PLP and RLP.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32868751
pii: 00006396-202102000-00028
doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002063
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
630-640Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 International Association for the Study of Pain.
Références
Agresti A. Analysis of ordinal categorical data. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2010.
Alviar MJM, Hale T, Dungca M. Pharmacologic interventions for treating phantom limb pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;10:CD006380.
Bauer A, Hagenburger J, Plank T, Busch V, Greenlee MW. Mechanical pain thresholds and the rubber hand illusion. Front Psychol 2018;9:712.
Bekrater-Bodmann R, Schredl M, Diers M, Reinhard I, Foell J, Trojan J, Fuchs X, Flor H. Post-amputation pain is associated with the recall of an impaired body representation in dreams-results from a nation-wide survey on limb amputees. PLoS One 2015;10:e0119552.
Blanke O. Multisensory brain mechanisms of bodily self-consciousness. Nat Rev Neurosci 2012;13:556–71.
Botvinick M, Cohen J. Rubber hands “feel” touch that eyes see. Nature 1998;391:756.
Brozzoli C, Gentile G, Ehrsson HH. That's near my hand! Parietal and premotor coding of hand-centered space contributes to localization and self-attribution of the hand. J Neurosci 2012;32:14573–82.
Burin D, Pyasik M, Salatino A, Pia L. That's my hand! Therefore, that's my willed action: how body ownership acts upon conscious awareness of willed actions. Cognition 2017;166:164–73.
Canzoneri E, Marzolla M, Amoresano A, Verni G, Serino A. Amputation and prosthesis implantation shape body and peripersonal space representations. Sci Rep 2013;3:2844.
Chan BL, Witt R, Charrow AP, Magee A, Howard R, Pasquina PF, Heilman KM, Tsao JW. Mirror therapy for phantom limb pain. N Eng J Med 2007;357:2206–7.
Crea S, D'Alonzo M, Vitiello N, Cipriani C. The rubber foot illusion. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2015;12:77.
Davis RW. Phantom sensation, phantom pain, and stump pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:79–91.
Desmond D, Gallagher P, Henderson-Slater D, Chatfield R. Pain and psychosocial adjustment to lower limb amputation amongst prosthesis users. Prosthet Orthot Int 2008;32:244–52.
Diers M, Löffler A, Zieglgänsberger W, Trojan J. Watching your pain site reduces pain intensity in chronic back pain patients. Eur J Pain 2016;20:581–5.
Ehrsson HH, Rosén B, Stockselius A, Ragnö C, Köhler P, Lundborg G. Upper limb amputees can be induced to experience a rubber hand as their own. Brain 2008;131:3443–52.
Ephraim PL, Wegener ST, MacKenzie EJ, Dillingham TR, Pezzin LE. Phantom pain, residual limb pain, and back pain in amputees: results of a national survey. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:1910–19.
Fang W, Zhang R, Zhao Y, Wang L, Zhou Y-D. Attenuation of pain perception induced by the rubber hand illusion. Front Neurosci 2019;13:261.
Ferracci S, Brancucci A. The influence of age on the rubber hand illusion. Conscious Cogn 2019;73:102756.
Flor H, Elbert T, Knecht S, Wienbruch C, Pantev C, Birbaumer N, Larbig W, Taub E. Phantom-limb pain as a perceptual correlate of cortical reorganization following arm amputation. Nature 1995;375:482–4.
Foell J, Andoh J, Bekrater-Bodmann R, Diers M, Fuchs X, Colloca L, Flor H. Peripheral origin of phantom limb pain: is it all resolved? PAIN 2014;155:2205–6.
Foell J, Bekrater-Bodmann R, Diers M, Flor H. Mirror therapy for phantom limb pain: brain changes and the role of body representation. Eur J Pain 2014;18:729–39.
Giummarra MJ, Georgiou-Karistianis N, Nicholls MER, Gibson SJ, Chou M, Bradshaw JL. Corporeal awareness and proprioceptive sense of the phantom. Br J Psychol 2010;101:791–808.
Haggard P, Iannetti GD, Longo MR. Spatial sensory organization and body representation in pain perception. Curr Biol 2013;23:R164–176.
Hänsel A, Lenggenhager B, von Känel R, Curatolo M, Blanke O. Seeing and identifying with a virtual body decreases pain perception. Eur J Pain 2011;15:874–9.
Hegedüs G, Darnai G, Szolcsányi T, Feldmann Á, Janszky J, Kállai J. The rubber hand illusion increases heat pain threshold. Eur J Pain 2014;18:1173–81.
Hunter JP, Katz J, Davis KD. The effect of tactile and visual sensory inputs on phantom limb awareness. Brain 2003;126:579–89.
Imaizumi S, Asai T, Koyama S. Embodied prosthetic arm stabilizes body posture, while unembodied one perturbs it. Conscious Cogn 2016;45:75–88.
Jensen TS, Rasmussen P. Phantom pain and other phenomena after amputation. In: Wall PD, Melzack R, editors. Textbook of pain. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1994. p. 651–65.
Kállai J, Kincses P, Lábadi B, Dorn K, Szolcsányi T, Darnai G, Hupuczi E, Janszky J, Csathó Á. Multisensory integration and age-dependent sensitivity to body representation modification induced by the rubber hand illusion. Cogn Process 2017;18:349–57.
Kern U, Busch V, Rockland M, Kohl M, Birklein F. Prevalence and risk factors of phantom limb pain and phantom limb sensations in Germany. A nationwide field survey [in German]. Schmerz 2009;23:479–88.
Larbig W, Andoh J, Huse E, Stahl-Corino D, Montoya P, Seltzer Z, Flor H. Pre- and postoperative predictors of phantom limb pain. Neurosci Lett 2019;702:44–50.
Lloyd DM. Spatial limits on referred touch to an alien limb may reflect boundaries of visuo-tactile peripersonal space surrounding the hand. Brain Cogn 2007;64:104–9.
Longo MR, Betti V, Aglioti SM, Haggard P. Visually induced analgesia: seeing the body reduces pain. J Neurosci 2009;29:12125–30.
Longo MR, Iannetti GD, Mancini F, Driver J, Haggard P. Linking pain and the body: neural correlates of visually induced analgesia. J Neurosci 2012;32:2601–7.
Longo MR, Schüür F, Kammers MPM, Tsakiris M, Haggard P. What is embodiment? A psychometric approach. Cognition 2008;107:978–98.
Lotze M, Grodd W, Birbaumer N, Erb M, Huse E, Flor H. Does use of a myoelectric prosthesis prevent cortical reorganization and phantom limb pain? Nat Neurosci 1999;2:501–2.
Maister L, Sebanz N, Knoblich G, Tsakiris M. Experiencing ownership over a dark-skinned body reduces implicit racial bias. Cognition 2013;128:170–8.
Makin TR, Scholz J, Filippini N, Henderson Slater D, Tracey I, Johansen-Berg H. Phantom pain is associated with preserved structure and function in the former hand area. Nat Commun 2013;4:1570.
Marotta A, Zampini M, Tinazzi M, Fiorio M. Age-related changes in the sense of body ownership: new insights from the rubber hand illusion. PLoS One 2018;13:e0207528.
Martini M. Commentary: mechanical pain thresholds and the rubber hand illusion. Front Psychol 2018;9:1715.
McCabe CS, Haigh RC, Ring EFJ, Halligan PW, Wall PD, Blake DR. A controlled pilot study of the utility of mirror visual feedback in the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome (type 1). Rheumatology (Oxford) 2003;42:97–101.
McCullagh P. Regression models for ordinal data. J R Stat Soc B 1980;42:109–42.
McDonnell PM, Scott RN, Dickison J, Theriault RA, Wood B. Do artificial limbs become part of the user? New evidence. J Rehabil Res Dev 1989;26:17–24.
Melzack R, Israel R, Lacroix R, Schultz G. Phantom limbs in people with congenital limb deficiency or amputation in early childhood. Brain 1997;120(pt 9):1603–20.
Mohan R, Jensen KB, Petkova VI, Dey A, Barnsley N, Ingvar M, McAuley JH, Moseley GL, Ehrsson HH. No pain relief with the rubber hand illusion. PLoS One 2012;7:e52400.
Murray CD. An interpretative phenomenological analysis of the embodiment of artificial limbs. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26:963–73.
Murray CD. Embodiment and prosthetics. In: Gallagher P, Desmond D, MacLachlan M, editors. Psychoprosthetics. London: Springer, 2008. p. 119–29.
Nierula B, Martini M, Matamala-Gomez M, Slater M, Sanchez-Vives MV. Seeing an embodied virtual hand is analgesic contingent on colocation. J Pain 2017;18:645–55.
Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971;9:97–113.
Page DM, George JA, Kluger DT, Duncan C, Wendelken S, Davis T, Hutchinson DT, Clark GA. Motor control and sensory feedback enhance prosthesis embodiment and reduce phantom pain after long-term hand amputation. Front Hum Neurosci 2018;12:352.
Palomo P, Borrego A, Cebolla A, Llorens R, Demarzo M, Baños RM. Subjective, behavioral, and physiological responses to the rubber hand illusion do not vary with age in the adult phase. Conscious Cogn 2018;58:90–6.
Petrini FM, Valle G, Bumbasirevic M, Barberi F, Bortolotti D, Cvancara P, Hiairrassary A, Mijovic P, Sverrisson AÖ, Pedrocchi A, Divoux J-L, Popovic I, Lechler K, Mijovic B, Guiraud D, Stieglitz T, Alexandersson A, Micera S, Lesic A, Raspopovic S. Enhancing functional abilities and cognitive integration of the lower limb prosthesis. Sci Transl Med 2019;11:eaav8939.
Raichle KA, Hanley MA, Molton I, Kadel NJ, Campbell K, Phelps E, Ehde D, Smith DG. Prosthesis use in persons with lower- and upper-limb amputation. J Rehabil Res Dev 2008;45:961–72.
Ramachandran VS, Rogers-Ramachandran D. Synaesthesia in phantom limbs induced with mirrors. Proc Biol Sci 1996;263:377–86.
Ramachandran VS, Rogers-Ramachandran D, Cobb S. Touching the phantom limb. Nature 1995;377:489–90.
Reinersmann A, Haarmeyer GS, Blankenburg M, Frettlöh J, Krumova EK, Ocklenburg S, Maier C. Left is where the L is right. Significantly delayed reaction time in limb laterality recognition in both CRPS and phantom limb pain patients. Neurosci Lett 2010;486:240–5.
Riemer M, Trojan J, Beauchamp M, Fuchs X. The rubber hand universe: on the impact of methodological differences in the rubber hand illusion. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2019;104:268–80.
Rothgangel A, Bekrater-Bodmann R. Mirror therapy versus augmented/virtual reality applications: towards a tailored mechanism-based treatment for phantom limb pain. Pain Manag 2019;9:151–9.
Sato Y, Kawase T, Takano K, Spence C, Kansaku K. Incorporation of prosthetic limbs into the body representation of amputees: evidence from the crossed hands temporal order illusion. Prog Brain Res 2017;236:225–41.
Sherman RA, Sherman CJ, Parker L. Chronic phantom and stump pain among American veterans: results of a survey. PAIN 1984;18:83–95.
Streit F, Bekrater-Bodmann R, Diers M, Reinhard I, Frank J, Wüst S, Seltzer Z, Flor H, Rietschel M. Concordance of phantom and residual limb pain phenotypes in double amputees: evidence for the contribution of distinct and common individual factors. J Pain 2015;16:1377–85.
Sumitani M, Miyauchi S, McCabe CS, Shibata M, Maeda L, Saitoh Y, Tashiro T, Mashimo T. Mirror visual feedback alleviates deafferentation pain, depending on qualitative aspects of the pain: a preliminary report. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2008;47:1038–43.
van den Heiligenberg FMZ, Orlov T, Macdonald SN, Duff EP, Henderson Slater D, Beckmann CF, Johansen-Berg H, Culham JC, Makin TR. Artificial limb representation in amputees. Brain 2018;141:1422–33.
van der Schans CP, Geertzen JHB, Schoppen T, Dijkstra PU. Phantom pain and health-related quality of life in lower limb amputees. J Pain Symptom Manage 2002;24:429–36.
Vaso A, Adahan HM, Gjika A, Zahaj S, Zhurda T, Vyshka G, Devor M. Peripheral nervous system origin of phantom limb pain. PAIN 2014;155:1384–91.
Weiss T, Miltner WH, Adler T, Brückner L, Taub E. Decrease in phantom limb pain associated with prosthesis-induced increased use of an amputation stump in humans. Neurosci Lett 1999;272:131–4.
Winter C, Fritsche K, Karl A, Huse E, Labig W, Grüsser SM, Flor H. The phantom and stump phenomena interview (PSPI) [in German]. Schmerz 2001;15:172–8.