Predicting complications of diabetes mellitus using advanced machine learning algorithms.
RNN models
deep learning
diabetes mellitus
diabetes mellitus complications
machine learning
Journal
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
ISSN: 1527-974X
Titre abrégé: J Am Med Inform Assoc
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9430800
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 07 2020
01 07 2020
Historique:
received:
21
02
2020
revised:
17
05
2020
accepted:
28
05
2020
pubmed:
2
9
2020
medline:
7
4
2021
entrez:
2
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We sought to predict if patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) would develop 10 selected complications. Accurate prediction of complications could help with more targeted measures that would prevent or slow down their development. Experiments were conducted on the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Databases of California for the period of 2003 to 2011. Recurrent neural network (RNN) long short-term memory (LSTM) and RNN gated recurrent unit (GRU) deep learning methods were designed and compared with random forest and multilayer perceptron traditional models. Prediction accuracy of selected complications were compared on 3 settings corresponding to minimum number of hospitalizations between diabetes diagnosis and the diagnosis of complications. The diagnosis domain was used for experiments. The best results were achieved with RNN GRU model, followed by RNN LSTM model. The prediction accuracy achieved with RNN GRU model was between 73% (myocardial infarction) and 83% (chronic ischemic heart disease), while accuracy of traditional models was between 66% - 76%. The number of hospitalizations was an important factor for the prediction accuracy. Experiments with 4 hospitalizations achieved significantly better accuracy than with 2 hospitalizations. To achieve improved accuracy deep learning models required training on at least 1000 patients and accuracy significantly dropped if training datasets contained 500 patients. The prediction accuracy of complications decreases over time period. Considering individual complications, the best accuracy was achieved on depressive disorder and chronic ischemic heart disease. The RNN GRU model was the best choice for electronic medical record type of data, based on the achieved results.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32869093
pii: 5899846
doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa120
pmc: PMC7647294
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1343-1351Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Références
Endocr Pract. 2018 Jan;24(1):91-120
pubmed: 29368965
JCI Insight. 2017 Jul 20;2(14):
pubmed: 28724805
Lancet Neurol. 2012 Jun;11(6):521-34
pubmed: 22608666
BMJ. 2019 Nov 5;367:l5887
pubmed: 31690574
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Mar 1;179(3):293-294
pubmed: 30556825
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2015;16(2):105-13
pubmed: 26198557
Ear Hear. 2015 Jul-Aug;36(4):381-94
pubmed: 25565662
Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2018 Oct-Dec;14(4):273-280
pubmed: 30788013
Sci Rep. 2019 Sep 24;9(1):13805
pubmed: 31551457
J Med Internet Res. 2018 May 30;20(5):e10775
pubmed: 29848472
Mo Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;113(5):390-394
pubmed: 30228506
Br Med Bull. 2018 Jun 1;126(1):123-137
pubmed: 29897499
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018 Mar;12(2):295-302
pubmed: 28494618
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Mar 1;24(2):361-370
pubmed: 27521897
Emerg Med J. 2003 Jan;20(1):54-60
pubmed: 12533370
World J Diabetes. 2015 Oct 10;6(13):1246-58
pubmed: 26468341
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Feb 3;53(5 Suppl):S35-42
pubmed: 19179216
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jan;89:56-67
pubmed: 30189255
Curr Diab Rep. 2014 Jun;14(6):491
pubmed: 24743941