Why Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Therapy Failed in HCC. Can the New Immunotherapy Be Expected to Be Better?
Ablation Techniques
/ methods
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
/ immunology
Chemoembolization, Therapeutic
/ methods
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
/ methods
Disease-Free Survival
Drug Development
Humans
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
/ therapeutic use
Immunotherapy
/ methods
Liver Neoplasms
/ immunology
Neoadjuvant Therapy
/ methods
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
/ epidemiology
Protein Kinase Inhibitors
/ therapeutic use
Radiotherapy, Adjuvant
/ methods
Time Factors
Treatment Failure
Adjuvant
Immunotherapy
Neoadjuvant
Journal
Journal of gastrointestinal cancer
ISSN: 1941-6636
Titre abrégé: J Gastrointest Cancer
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101479627
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Dec 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
2
9
2020
medline:
11
5
2021
entrez:
2
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
HCC remains a challenging disease with its unique characteristics and aggressive behavior. Although there are some curative-intent treatments such as liver transplantation and surgical resection, they themselves did not cure the patients with relatively high recurrence rates. Several modalities including local ablation methods like TACE or TARE, systemic treatments such as chemotherapy, tyrosine kinase inhibitors or antiviral therapies are tested in adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting, but none of them offered a survival benefit (except antiviral therapy in HBV-related HCC). After a decade of plateau in drug development, ICPIs came into podium with their different mechanism of action consistent with immunogenic nature of the disease and with high expectations, and ongoing trials will show if these agents can satisfy unmet demand in this area.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32869146
doi: 10.1007/s12029-020-00497-7
pii: 10.1007/s12029-020-00497-7
doi:
Substances chimiques
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
0
Protein Kinase Inhibitors
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM