Biomarkers in Breast Cancer: An Integrated Analysis of Comprehensive Genomic Profiling and PD-L1 Immunohistochemistry Biomarkers in 312 Patients with Breast Cancer.


Journal

The oncologist
ISSN: 1549-490X
Titre abrégé: Oncologist
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9607837

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 2020
Historique:
received: 17 05 2020
accepted: 04 08 2020
pubmed: 2 9 2020
medline: 22 6 2021
entrez: 2 9 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

We examined the current biomarker landscape in breast cancer when programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) testing is integrated with comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP). We analyzed data from samples of 312 consecutive patients with breast carcinoma tested with both CGP and PD-L1 (SP142) immunohistochemistry (IHC) during routine clinical care. These samples were stratified into hormone receptor positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor negative (HER2-; n = 159), HER2-positive (n = 32), and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cohorts (n = 121). We found that in the TNBC cohort, 43% (52/121) were immunocyte PD-L1-positive, and in the HR+/HER2- cohort, 30% (48/159) had PIK3CA companion diagnostics mutations, and hence were potentially eligible for atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel or alpelisib plus fulvestrant, respectively. Of the remaining 212 patients, 10.4% (22/212) had a BRCA1/2 mutation, which, if confirmed by germline testing, would allow olaparib plus talazoparib therapy. Of the remaining 190 patients, 169 (88.9%) were positive for another therapy-associated marker or a marker that would potentially qualify the patient for a clinical trial. In addition, we examined the relationship between immunocyte PD-L1 positivity and different tumor mutation burden (TMB) cutoffs and found that when a TMB cutoff of ≥9 mutations per Mb was applied (cutoff determined based on prior publication), 11.6% (14/121) patients were TMB ≥9 mutations/Mb and of these, TMB ≥9 mutations per Mb, 71.4% (10/14) were also positive for PD-L1 IHC. Our integrated PD-L1 and CGP methodology identified 32% of the tested patients as potentially eligible for at least one of the two new Food and Drug Administration approved therapies, atezolizumab or alpelisib, and an additional 61.2% (191/312) had other biomarker-guided potential therapeutic options. This integrated programmed death-ligand 1 immunohistochemistry and comprehensive genomic profiling methodology identified 32% of the tested patients as eligible for at least one of the two new Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies, atezolizumab or alpelisib, and an additional 61.2% (191/312) had other biomarker-guided potential therapeutic options. These findings suggest new research opportunities to evaluate the predictive utility of other commonly seen PIK3CA mutations in hormone receptor-positive breast cancers and to standardize tumor mutation burden cutoffs to evaluate its potentially predictive role in triple-negative breast cancer.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
We examined the current biomarker landscape in breast cancer when programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) testing is integrated with comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP).
MATERIAL AND METHODS
We analyzed data from samples of 312 consecutive patients with breast carcinoma tested with both CGP and PD-L1 (SP142) immunohistochemistry (IHC) during routine clinical care. These samples were stratified into hormone receptor positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor negative (HER2-; n = 159), HER2-positive (n = 32), and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cohorts (n = 121).
RESULTS
We found that in the TNBC cohort, 43% (52/121) were immunocyte PD-L1-positive, and in the HR+/HER2- cohort, 30% (48/159) had PIK3CA companion diagnostics mutations, and hence were potentially eligible for atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel or alpelisib plus fulvestrant, respectively. Of the remaining 212 patients, 10.4% (22/212) had a BRCA1/2 mutation, which, if confirmed by germline testing, would allow olaparib plus talazoparib therapy. Of the remaining 190 patients, 169 (88.9%) were positive for another therapy-associated marker or a marker that would potentially qualify the patient for a clinical trial. In addition, we examined the relationship between immunocyte PD-L1 positivity and different tumor mutation burden (TMB) cutoffs and found that when a TMB cutoff of ≥9 mutations per Mb was applied (cutoff determined based on prior publication), 11.6% (14/121) patients were TMB ≥9 mutations/Mb and of these, TMB ≥9 mutations per Mb, 71.4% (10/14) were also positive for PD-L1 IHC.
CONCLUSION
Our integrated PD-L1 and CGP methodology identified 32% of the tested patients as potentially eligible for at least one of the two new Food and Drug Administration approved therapies, atezolizumab or alpelisib, and an additional 61.2% (191/312) had other biomarker-guided potential therapeutic options.
IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE
This integrated programmed death-ligand 1 immunohistochemistry and comprehensive genomic profiling methodology identified 32% of the tested patients as eligible for at least one of the two new Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies, atezolizumab or alpelisib, and an additional 61.2% (191/312) had other biomarker-guided potential therapeutic options. These findings suggest new research opportunities to evaluate the predictive utility of other commonly seen PIK3CA mutations in hormone receptor-positive breast cancers and to standardize tumor mutation burden cutoffs to evaluate its potentially predictive role in triple-negative breast cancer.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32869930
doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2020-0449
pmc: PMC7648336
doi:

Substances chimiques

B7-H1 Antigen 0
Biomarkers, Tumor 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

943-953

Subventions

Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR001863
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© AlphaMed Press 2020.

Références

Curr Breast Cancer Rep. 2012 Sep;4(3):171-173
pubmed: 22924091
Nature. 2012 Oct 4;490(7418):61-70
pubmed: 23000897
Int J Cancer. 2010 Jul 15;127(2):355-60
pubmed: 19904758
Onco Targets Ther. 2015 Nov 11;8:3323-8
pubmed: 26648736
Science. 2019 Nov 8;366(6466):714-723
pubmed: 31699932
Stat Med. 2014 May 20;33(11):1946-78
pubmed: 24399688
N Engl J Med. 2018 Aug 23;379(8):753-763
pubmed: 30110579
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Aug;95(35):e4614
pubmed: 27583878
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009 Jan;113(1):75-82
pubmed: 18240019
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 May;98(18):e15449
pubmed: 31045815
Nat Biotechnol. 2013 Nov;31(11):1023-31
pubmed: 24142049
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 16;380(20):1929-1940
pubmed: 31091374
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2018 Apr 17;19(5):24
pubmed: 29666928
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 26;8(8):e72053
pubmed: 23991038
EMBO Mol Med. 2011 Mar;3(3):167-80
pubmed: 21337521
Genome Med. 2017 Apr 19;9(1):34
pubmed: 28420421
Breast Cancer (Auckl). 2015 Sep 27;9(Suppl 2):17-34
pubmed: 26462242
N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 10;377(6):523-533
pubmed: 28578601
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Apr;75:284-298
pubmed: 28259011

Auteurs

Richard S P Huang (RSP)

Foundation Medicine, Inc., Morrisville, North Carolina, USA.

Xinyan Li (X)

Foundation Medicine, Inc., Morrisville, North Carolina, USA.

James Haberberger (J)

Foundation Medicine, Inc., Morrisville, North Carolina, USA.

Ethan Sokol (E)

Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Eric Severson (E)

Foundation Medicine, Inc., Morrisville, North Carolina, USA.

Daniel L Duncan (DL)

Foundation Medicine, Inc., Morrisville, North Carolina, USA.

Amanda Hemmerich (A)

Foundation Medicine, Inc., Morrisville, North Carolina, USA.

Claire Edgerly (C)

Foundation Medicine, Inc., Morrisville, North Carolina, USA.

Erik Williams (E)

Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Julia Elvin (J)

Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Jo-Anne Vergilio (JA)

Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Jonathan Keith Killian (JK)

Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Douglas Lin (D)

Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Matthew Hiemenz (M)

Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Jinpeng Xiao (J)

Foundation Medicine, Inc., Morrisville, North Carolina, USA.

Deborah McEwan (D)

Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Oliver Holmes (O)

Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Natalie Danziger (N)

Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Rachel Erlich (R)

Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Garrett Frampton (G)

Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Michael B Cohen (MB)

Wake Forest Comprehensive Cancer Center and Department of Pathology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.

Kimberly McGregor (K)

Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Prasanth Reddy (P)

Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Dawn Cardeiro (D)

Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Rachel Anhorn (R)

Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Jeffrey Venstrom (J)

Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Brian Alexander (B)

Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Charlotte Brown (C)

Foundation Medicine, Inc., Morrisville, North Carolina, USA.

Lajos Pusztai (L)

Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

Jeffrey S Ross (JS)

Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Department of Pathology, State University of New York (SUNY) Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, USA.

Shakti H Ramkissoon (SH)

Foundation Medicine, Inc., Morrisville, North Carolina, USA.
Wake Forest Comprehensive Cancer Center and Department of Pathology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH