The Role of Active-Site Plasticity in Damaged-Nucleotide Recognition by Human Apurinic/Apyrimidinic Endonuclease APE1.
5,6-dihydrouridine
AP endonuclease
active site plasticity
apurinic/apyrimidinic site
base excision repair
conformational dynamics
Journal
Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1420-3049
Titre abrégé: Molecules
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 100964009
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Aug 2020
28 Aug 2020
Historique:
received:
04
08
2020
revised:
25
08
2020
accepted:
26
08
2020
entrez:
3
9
2020
pubmed:
3
9
2020
medline:
18
3
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Human apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) endonuclease APE1 hydrolyzes phosphodiester bonds on the 5' side of an AP-site, and some damaged nucleotides such as 1,N6-ethenoadenosine (εA), α-adenosine (αA), and 5,6-dihydrouridine (DHU). To investigate the mechanism behind the broad substrate specificity of APE1, we analyzed pre-steady-state kinetics of conformational changes in DNA and the enzyme during DNA binding and damage recognition. Molecular dynamics simulations of APE1 complexes with one of damaged DNA duplexes containing εA, αA, DHU, or an F-site (a stable analog of an AP-site) revealed the involvement of residues Asn229, Thr233, and Glu236 in the mechanism of DNA lesion recognition. The results suggested that processing of an AP-site proceeds faster in comparison with nucleotide incision repair substrates because eversion of a small abasic site and its insertion into the active site do not include any unfavorable interactions, whereas the insertion of any target nucleotide containing a damaged base into the APE1 active site is sterically hindered. Destabilization of the α-helix containing Thr233 and Glu236 via a loss of the interaction between these residues increased the plasticity of the damaged-nucleotide binding pocket and the ability to accommodate structurally different damaged nucleotides. Nonetheless, the optimal location of εA or αA in the binding pocket does not correspond to the optimal conformation of catalytic amino acid residues, thereby significantly decreasing the cleavage efficacy for these substrates.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32872297
pii: molecules25173940
doi: 10.3390/molecules25173940
pmc: PMC7504742
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Nucleotides
0
APEX1 protein, human
EC 4.2.99.18
DNA-(Apurinic or Apyrimidinic Site) Lyase
EC 4.2.99.18
Magnesium
I38ZP9992A
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation
ID : MD-3775.2019.4
Organisme : Russian Science Foundation
ID : 18-14-00135
Organisme : Russian-State-funded budget project
ID : АААА-А17-117020210022-4
Références
Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2015 Nov;22(11):924-31
pubmed: 26458045
PLoS One. 2010 Aug 17;5(8):e12241
pubmed: 20808930
J Biol Chem. 1995 Jul 7;270(27):16002-7
pubmed: 7608159
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Jan;80(2):487-91
pubmed: 6300848
Biochemistry (Mosc). 2011 Feb;76(2):273-81
pubmed: 21568862
J Nucleic Acids. 2010 Jul 25;2010:
pubmed: 20798848
J Cell Sci. 2011 Feb 1;124(Pt 3):435-46
pubmed: 21224401
EMBO J. 1997 Nov 3;16(21):6548-58
pubmed: 9351835
Biochimie. 2019 Aug;163:73-83
pubmed: 31150756
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 12;9(6):e100007
pubmed: 24925085
Mutat Res. 2000 Aug 30;460(3-4):211-29
pubmed: 10946230
J Phys Chem B. 2019 Nov 14;123(45):9546-9556
pubmed: 31633353
DNA Repair (Amst). 2005 Dec 8;4(12):1442-9
pubmed: 16199212
DNA Repair (Amst). 2016 Dec;48:30-42
pubmed: 27836324
Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Jan 02;32(1):73-81
pubmed: 14704345
Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 May 20;32(9):2844-52
pubmed: 15155853
Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 1999;28:101-28
pubmed: 10410797
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014 Oct;1840(10):3042-51
pubmed: 25086253
Nature. 2000 Jan 27;403(6768):451-6
pubmed: 10667800
Anal Biochem. 1976 May 7;72:248-54
pubmed: 942051
Antioxid Redox Signal. 2014 Feb 1;20(4):678-707
pubmed: 23834463
PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24063
pubmed: 21912662
Mol Biosyst. 2016 Oct 18;12(11):3435-3446
pubmed: 27722620
J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2010 Feb;27(4):443-56
pubmed: 19916566
Mutat Res. 2001 May 10;485(4):283-307
pubmed: 11585362
J Mol Biol. 2001 Apr 6;307(4):1023-34
pubmed: 11286553
Mol Biol (Mosk). 2007 May-Jun;41(3):450-66
pubmed: 17685223
Annu Rev Genet. 1986;20:201-30
pubmed: 3545059
Biochemistry. 2010 Aug 3;49(30):6451-61
pubmed: 20575528
J Biol Chem. 1997 Jan 10;272(2):1302-7
pubmed: 8995436
Chem Rev. 1998 May 7;98(3):1221-1262
pubmed: 11848931
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Sep 24;110(39):E3695-703
pubmed: 24023064
Acta Naturae. 2016 Jan-Mar;8(1):103-10
pubmed: 27099790
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e51776
pubmed: 23251620
Molecules. 2018 Aug 21;23(9):
pubmed: 30134601
Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 Nov 30;46(21):11454-11465
pubmed: 30329131
Mol Biosyst. 2016 May 26;12(5):1527-39
pubmed: 27063150
J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2009 Apr;26(5):637-52
pubmed: 19236113
J Biol Chem. 2013 Mar 22;288(12):8445-55
pubmed: 23355472
Acta Naturae. 2020 Apr-Jun;12(2):74-85
pubmed: 32742730
DNA Repair (Amst). 2007 Jan 4;6(1):8-18
pubmed: 16978929
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014 Jan;1840(1):387-95
pubmed: 24096108
Proteins. 2010 Jun;78(8):1950-8
pubmed: 20408171
Nature. 1993 Apr 22;362(6422):709-15
pubmed: 8469282
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2013 Dec;69(Pt 12):2555-62
pubmed: 24311596