Underlying Subwavelength Aperture Architecture Drives the Optical Properties of Microcavity Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensors.
MSPRS
microcavity surface plasmon resonance sensors
optical biosensors
standing surface plasmon waves
surface plasmon polaritons
surface plasmon resonance
Journal
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1424-8220
Titre abrégé: Sensors (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101204366
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 Aug 2020
30 Aug 2020
Historique:
received:
04
08
2020
revised:
25
08
2020
accepted:
27
08
2020
entrez:
3
9
2020
pubmed:
3
9
2020
medline:
3
9
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Microcavity surface plasmon resonance sensors (MSPRSs) develop out of the classic surface plasmon resonance technologies and aim at producing novel lab-on-a-chip devices. MSPRSs generate a series of spectral resonances sensitive to minute changes in the refractive index. Related sensitivity studies and biosensing applications are published elsewhere. The goal of this work is to test the hypothesis that MSPRS resonances are standing surface plasmon waves excited at the surface of the sensor that decay back into propagating photons. Their optical properties (mean wavelength, peak width, and peak intensity) appear highly dependent on the internal morphology of the sensor and the underlying subwavelength aperture architecture in particular. Numerous optical experiments were designed to investigate trends that confirm this hypothesis. An extensive study of prior works was supportive of our findings and interpretations. A complete understanding of those mechanisms and parameters driving the formations of the MSPRS resonances would allow further improvement in sensor sensitivity, reliability, and manufacturability.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32872658
pii: s20174906
doi: 10.3390/s20174906
pmc: PMC7506739
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The raw data presented in Figures 4a and 8 were initially presented within N.M.’s M.S. Thesis [36]. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.
Références
Opt Express. 2006 Mar 20;14(6):2365-71
pubmed: 19503574
Opt Express. 2006 Dec 25;14(26):13050-5
pubmed: 19532200
Opt Lett. 1999 Aug 1;24(15):1011-3
pubmed: 18073924
J Phys Chem B. 2005 Aug 18;109(32):15515-9
pubmed: 16852968
Chem Rev. 2011 Jun 8;111(6):3828-57
pubmed: 21648956
Biomed Mater Eng. 2015;26 Suppl 1:S2207-16
pubmed: 26406000
Nano Lett. 2005 Oct;5(10):1963-7
pubmed: 16218718
Opt Lett. 2000 Jun 1;25(11):844-6
pubmed: 18064203
Sensors (Basel). 2014 Mar 11;14(3):4948-59
pubmed: 24618778
Nano Lett. 2005 Jul;5(7):1227-30
pubmed: 16178215
Analyst. 2015 Jan 21;140(2):386-406
pubmed: 25365823
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019 Aug 7;11(31):28189-28196
pubmed: 31298836
Sensors (Basel). 2015 May 05;15(5):10481-510
pubmed: 25951336
Anal Chem. 2010 Jan 1;82(1):343-52
pubmed: 19968248
Biosens Bioelectron. 2010 Oct 15;26(2):674-81
pubmed: 20673712
Nanotechnology. 2019 Feb 1;30(5):055703
pubmed: 30511666
Opt Lett. 1983 Jul 1;8(7):386-8
pubmed: 19718123
Appl Opt. 1998 Aug 1;37(22):5271-83
pubmed: 18286006
Chem Rev. 2011 Jun 8;111(6):3669-712
pubmed: 21395318
Langmuir. 2012 Sep 18;28(37):13373-9
pubmed: 22920036
Plasmonics. 2016;11:941-951
pubmed: 27340380
Nano Lett. 2005 Jan;5(1):119-24
pubmed: 15792424
Sensors (Basel). 2012 Dec 13;12(12):17262-94
pubmed: 23443397