Influence of Epidural Ropivacaine with or without Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Analgesia and Patient Satisfaction after Thoraco-Lumbar Spine Instrumentation: A Randomized, Comparative, and Double-Blind Study.

Dexmedetomidine Epidural analgesia Pedicle screw fixation Postoperative pain Thoracolumbar spine surgery

Journal

Asian spine journal
ISSN: 1976-1902
Titre abrégé: Asian Spine J
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101314177

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Historique:
received: 17 02 2020
accepted: 20 04 2020
pubmed: 3 9 2020
medline: 3 9 2020
entrez: 3 9 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

This was a prospective, randomized, and double-blind study. Thoraco-lumbar spine surgery is associated with severe postoperative pain and can cause chronic pain. We aimed to compare the impact of epidural ropivacaine with and without dexmedetomidine on postoperative analgesia after thoracolumbar spine instrumentation wherein an epidural catheter was placed by the surgeon intraoperatively. Very few studies have reported the use of epidural dexmedetomidine in spine surgeries. When used via the epidural route, dexmedetomidine is safe and efficacious and is associated with reduced rescue analgesia consumption, increased duration of analgesia, reduced pain scores, but not with major hemodynamic adverse effects. Total 60 American Society of Anesthesiologists I-III adult patients aged 18-65 years who were scheduled to undergo thoraco-lumbar spine instrumentation were randomly allocated into group RD (epidural ropivacaine+dexmedetomidine) or group R (epidural ropivacaine plus saline). We aimed to compare the total rescue analgesic consumption on postoperative day 0, 1, and 2. Moreover, we studied the time to first rescue analgesia with visual analogue scale score <4 and the overall patient satisfaction scores. There was no difference between the demographic characteristics of the two groups. The mean value of total rescue analgesia consumption was 162.5±68.4 mg in the RD group and 247.5±48.8 mg in the R group. The mean time to first rescue analgesia was 594.6±83.0 minutes in the RD group and 103.6±53.2 minutes in the R group. The mean patient satisfaction score was 4.2±0.7 in the RD group and 3.2±0.6 in the R group. No patient had any respiratory depression or prolonged motor blockade during the postoperative period. This study demonstrated the superior efficacy, in terms of postoperative analgesia and patient satisfaction scores, of epidural ropivacaine plus dexmedetomidine over that of ropivacaine alone in patients undergoing surgery for thoraco-lumbar spine.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32872755
pii: asj.2020.0072
doi: 10.31616/asj.2020.0072
pmc: PMC8217855
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

324-332

Références

Anesthesiology. 2004 Jul;101(1):175-80
pubmed: 15220788
Anesthesiology. 1999 Apr;90(4):944-50
pubmed: 10201661
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Jan 1;37(1):67-76
pubmed: 21311399
Indian J Anaesth. 2013 Jul;57(4):371-6
pubmed: 24163451
Anesthesiology. 1996 Apr;84(4):873-81
pubmed: 8638842
Br J Anaesth. 2001 Jul;87(1):62-72
pubmed: 11460814
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jan;96(1):e5770
pubmed: 28072722
Pain Physician. 2008 Mar;11(2 Suppl):S105-20
pubmed: 18443635
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2008 Mar-Apr;54(2):110-5
pubmed: 18506317
Natl Med J India. 2008 Jan-Feb;21(1):14-20
pubmed: 18472698
Indian J Anaesth. 2011 Mar;55(2):116-21
pubmed: 21712865
Clin Drug Investig. 2017 Apr;37(4):343-354
pubmed: 27812971
Anesth Essays Res. 2016 May-Aug;10(2):218-22
pubmed: 27212750
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Apr 15;28(8):739-43
pubmed: 12698113
Anesthesiology. 1993 May;78(5):813-20
pubmed: 8098190
J Pain Res. 2017 Sep 25;10:2287-2298
pubmed: 29026331
Anesth Analg. 2004 Jan;98(1):166-72, table of contents
pubmed: 14693613
Anesth Analg. 1995 Nov;81(5):982-6
pubmed: 7486088
Saudi J Anaesth. 2011 Oct;5(4):365-70
pubmed: 22144922
Perioper Med (Lond). 2014 Nov 26;3(1):10
pubmed: 25485103
J Pain Res. 2018 Oct 30;11:2675-2685
pubmed: 30464585
Lancet. 2002 Aug 10;360(9331):426
pubmed: 12241712
Anesth Essays Res. 2018 Jan-Mar;12(1):103-108
pubmed: 29628563

Auteurs

Faisal Qureshi (F)

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Shyam Charan Meena (SC)

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Vishal Kumar (V)

Department of Orthopaedic surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Kajal Jain (K)

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Rajeev Chauhan (R)

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Ankur Luthra (A)

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Classifications MeSH