Re-evaluation of sodium aluminium silicate (E 554) and potassium aluminium silicate (E 555) as food additives.

E 554 E 555 pearlescent pigments potassium aluminium silicate sodium aluminium silicate

Journal

EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority
ISSN: 1831-4732
Titre abrégé: EFSA J
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101642076

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2020
Historique:
entrez: 3 9 2020
pubmed: 3 9 2020
medline: 3 9 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) provided a scientific opinion re-evaluating the safety of Sodium aluminium silicate (E 554) and potassium aluminium silicate (E 555) as food additives. The Scientific Committee for Food (SCF) assigned these food additives together with other aluminium-containing food additives a provisional tolerable weekly intake (PTWI) of 7 mg aluminium/kg body weight (bw). In 2008, EFSA established a tolerable weekly intake (TWI) of 1 mg aluminium/kg bw per week. Sodium aluminium silicate was shown in rats to be absorbed to a limited extent at 0.12 ± 0.011%. The Panel considered that potassium aluminium silicate would be absorbed and become systemically available similarly to sodium aluminium silicate. No information on the physicochemical characterisation of sodium aluminium silicate and potassium aluminium silicate when used as food additives has been submitted and only very limited toxicological data were available for sodium aluminium silicate. Exposure to E 554 was calculated based on the reported use levels in food supplements. Exposure to aluminium from this use of E 554 was calculated to exceed the TWI for aluminium. Based on the data provided by interested business operators, the Panel considered that E 555 is not being used as a carrier, but as an inseparable component of 'potassium aluminium silicate-based pearlescent pigments'. The Panel calculated the regulatory maximum exposure to E 555 as a carrier for titanium dioxide (E 171) and iron oxides and hydroxides (E 172). Exposure to aluminium from this single use at the maximum permitted level could theoretically far exceed the TWI. Considering that only very limited toxicological data and insufficient information on the physicochemical characterisation of both food additives were available, the Panel concluded that the safety of sodium aluminium silicate (E 554) and potassium aluminium silicate (E 555) could not be assessed.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32874328
doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6152
pii: EFS26152
pmc: PMC7448050
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e06152

Informations de copyright

© 2020 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.

Références

Arch Toxicol. 2019 Dec;93(12):3503-3521
pubmed: 31659427
EFSA J. 2018 Aug 02;16(8):e05375
pubmed: 32626019
Nanomaterials (Basel). 2020 Mar 24;10(3):
pubmed: 32213951
EFSA J. 2017 Oct 17;15(10):e05042
pubmed: 32625325
Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 2020 Feb;37(2):239-253
pubmed: 31990642
Neuroscience. 2011 Oct 13;193:338-62
pubmed: 21699960
IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 1990;49:1-648
pubmed: 2232124
EFSA J. 2008 Jul 15;6(7):754
pubmed: 37213837
EFSA J. 2020 Jun 10;18(6):e06152
pubmed: 32874328

Auteurs

Classifications MeSH