Tibial tuberosity ossification predicts reoperation for growth disturbance in distal femoral physeal fractures.
femur
fracture
growth disturbance
physeal
tibial tuberosity
Journal
Journal of children's orthopaedics
ISSN: 1863-2521
Titre abrégé: J Child Orthop
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101313582
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Aug 2020
01 Aug 2020
Historique:
entrez:
3
9
2020
pubmed:
3
9
2020
medline:
3
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Distal femoral physeal fractures (DFPF) can cause growth disturbance that requires further surgical intervention. The aim of this study is to determine if Tibial Tuberosity Ossification Stage (TTOS) at the time of injury predicts secondary surgery for growth disturbance in patients who have sustained a DFPF. We retrospectively investigated all patients who had operative treatment for a DFPF at a single centre over a 17-year period. Regression analysis was performed investigating associations between secondary surgery to treat growth disturbance and TTOS, age, Salter-Harris fracture classification type, mode of fixation or mechanism of injury. In all, 85 consecutive patients were identified. A total of 74 met the inclusion criteria. The mean age at time of injury was 13.1 years (2.0 to 17.1). Following fixation, 30 patients (41%) underwent further surgery to treat growth disturbance. Absence of tibial tuberosity fusion to the metaphysis was significantly associated with the need for further surgery (p < 0.001). Odds of requiring secondary surgery after tibial tuberosity fusion to metaphysis (compared with not fused) were 0.12 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.04 to 0.34). The estimate of the effect of TTOS on reoperation rates did not vary when adjusted for gender, mechanism, fixation and Salter-Harris type. When accounting for age, the odds of any further operation if the tibial tuberosity is fused to the metaphysis (compared with not fused) were 0.28 (95% CI 0.08 to 0.94). TTOS at the time of injury is a predictor of further surgery to treat growth disturbance in paediatric distal femoral fractures. Diagnostic Level II.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32874363
doi: 10.1302/1863-2548.14.190073
pii: jco-14-299
pmc: PMC7453177
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
299-303Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020, The author(s).
Références
J Pediatr Orthop. 2007 Sep;27(6):671-6
pubmed: 17717469
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992 Feb;(275):274-9
pubmed: 1735225
J Pediatr Orthop. 2007 Sep;27(6):703-8
pubmed: 17717475
J Pediatr Orthop. 2007 Oct-Nov;27(7):796-800
pubmed: 17878787
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Feb 21;100(4):e20
pubmed: 29462038
Int Orthop. 1981;4(4):269-77
pubmed: 7228463
Lancet. 2014 Oct 18;384(9952):1437-45
pubmed: 25012116
Radiologia. 2016 Jul-Aug;58(4):294-300
pubmed: 26917430
J Pediatr Orthop. 2012 Apr-May;32(3):290-4
pubmed: 22411336
Clin Orthop. 1958;11:111-9
pubmed: 13561591
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Jul 1;42(13):999-1005
pubmed: 27831967
J Trauma. 1972 Apr;12(4):275-81
pubmed: 5018408
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 May;93(5):689-94
pubmed: 21511937
J Orthop Trauma. 2009 Oct;23(9):663-7
pubmed: 19897989
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983 Sep;65(7):885-93
pubmed: 6885868
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1977 Sep;59(6):742-51
pubmed: 908697
Instr Course Lect. 1992;41:351-9
pubmed: 1588078