Cervical Computed Tomography Angiography Rarely Leads to Intervention in Patients With Cervical Spine Fractures.
cervical fracture
cervical spine
computed tomography angiography
neurologic deficit
trauma
vertebral artery injury
Journal
Global spine journal
ISSN: 2192-5682
Titre abrégé: Global Spine J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101596156
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Dec 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
3
9
2020
medline:
3
9
2020
entrez:
3
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Retrospective cohort study. To evaluate the impact of computed tomography angiography (CTA) in the management of trauma patients with cervical spine fractures by identifying high-risk patients for vertebral artery injury (VAI), and evaluating how frequently patients undergo subsequent surgical/procedural intervention as a result of these findings. All trauma patients with cervical spine fractures who underwent CTA of the head and neck at our institution between January 2013 and October 2017 were identified. Patients were indicated for CTA according to our institutional protocol based on the modified Denver criteria, and included patients with cervical fractures on scout CT. Those with positive VAI were noted, along with their fracture location, and presence or absence of neurological deficit on physical examination. Statistical analysis was performed and odds ratios were calculated comparing the relationship of cervical spine fracture with presence of VAI. A total of 144 patients were included in our study. Of those, 25 patients (17.4%) were found to have VAI. Two patients (1.4%) with VAI underwent subsequent surgical/procedural intervention. Of the 25 cervical fractures with a VAI, 20 (80%), were found to involve the upper cervical region (4.2 OR, 95% CI 1.5-12.0; Cervical spine fractures located in the region of the C1-C3 vertebrae were more likely to have an associated VAI on CTA. VAI should also be considered in cervical trauma patients who present with neurological deficits not clearly explained by other pathology. Despite a finding of VAI, patients rarely underwent subsequent surgical or procedural intervention.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32875840
doi: 10.1177/2192568219885897
pmc: PMC7645098
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
992-997Références
J Trauma. 2010 Feb;68(2):471-7
pubmed: 20154559
Surgery. 2007 Jan;141(1):76-82
pubmed: 17188170
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Dec 1;33(25):E957-61
pubmed: 19050573
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Mar;24(3):490-5
pubmed: 26613284
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008 Aug;21(6):409-12
pubmed: 18679095
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Sep 5;100(17):1490-1495
pubmed: 30180057
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Jun 4;96(11):951-955
pubmed: 24897744
J Trauma. 2001 Aug;51(2):279-85; discussion 285-6
pubmed: 11493785
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Feb 15;37(4):286-91
pubmed: 21494192
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007 Sep;78(9):954-8
pubmed: 17098838
Ann Vasc Surg. 2016 Oct;36:145-152
pubmed: 27371360
Surg Neurol. 2006 Mar;65(3):238-45; discussion 245-6
pubmed: 16488240
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Nov 1;35(23):2035-40
pubmed: 20938397
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 May 20;35(12):E520-4
pubmed: 20445475
Ann Surg. 2002 Sep;236(3):386-93; discussion 393-5
pubmed: 12192325
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Jul 15;38(16):1352-61
pubmed: 23574813
Clin Spine Surg. 2017 Jun;30(5):232-235
pubmed: 28525467
J Neurosurg. 2014 Aug;121(2):450-6
pubmed: 24905561
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008 Jun;21(4):252-8
pubmed: 18525485
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Jun 1;93(11):1008-15
pubmed: 21984980
Ann Surg. 1998 Oct;228(4):462-70
pubmed: 9790336
Am J Surg. 1999 Dec;178(6):517-22
pubmed: 10670864