A Comparative Analysis of Patients Undergoing Fusion for Adult Cervical Deformity by Approach Type.

anterior cervical deformity posterior spine surgery surgical approach type

Journal

Global spine journal
ISSN: 2192-5682
Titre abrégé: Global Spine J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101596156

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Historique:
pubmed: 3 9 2020
medline: 3 9 2020
entrez: 3 9 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Retrospective cohort study. To provide insight into postoperative complications, short-term quality outcomes, and costs of the surgical approaches of adult cervical deformity (ACD). A national database was queried from 2007 to 2016 to identify patients who underwent cervical fusion for ACD. Patients were stratified by approach type-anterior, posterior, or circumferential. Patients undergoing anterior and posterior approach surgeries were additionally compared using propensity score matching. A total of 6575 patients underwent multilevel cervical fusion for ACD correction. Circumferential fusion had the highest postoperative complication rate (46.9% vs posterior: 36.7% vs anterior: 18.5%, Patients who undergo posterior fusion for ACD have higher complication rates, readmission rates, and higher cost burden than patients who undergo anterior fusion; however, posterior correction of ACD is associated with a lower rate of reoperation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32875897
doi: 10.1177/2192568220915717
pmc: PMC8165914
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

626-632

Références

J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Aug;19(2):141-59
pubmed: 23768023
Neurosurgery. 2005 Jan;56(1 Suppl):191-5; discussion 191-5
pubmed: 15799810
Spine J. 2010 May;10(5):380-7
pubmed: 20227924
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015 Aug;28(7):E385-93
pubmed: 23732179
Neurosurg Focus. 2010 Mar;28(3):E14
pubmed: 20192659
Eur Spine J. 2011 Apr;20(4):523-36
pubmed: 20967471
J Neurosurg. 2004 Jan;100(1 Suppl Spine):13-9
pubmed: 14748568
Neurosurgery. 2017 Aug 1;81(2):197-203
pubmed: 28838143
Neurosurgery. 2016 Sep;79(3):378-88
pubmed: 26595429
J Neurosurg. 1994 Jun;80(6):963-70
pubmed: 8189276
J Neurosurg. 2003 Jan;98(1 Suppl):1-7
pubmed: 12546381
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009 Aug;22(6):385-91
pubmed: 19652562
Orthop Clin North Am. 1992 Jul;23(3):505-11
pubmed: 1620542
J Neurosurg Spine. 2008 Dec;9(6):515-21
pubmed: 19035741
Eur Spine J. 2006 Apr;15(4):493-500
pubmed: 15928952
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Apr 1;33(7):771-8
pubmed: 18379404
Neurosurgery. 2007 Jan;60(1 Supp1 1):S90-7
pubmed: 17204892
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999 Nov 15;24(22):2389-96
pubmed: 10586466
Instr Course Lect. 2009;58:737-45
pubmed: 19385582

Auteurs

Kunal Varshneya (K)

10624Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Zachary A Medress (ZA)

10624Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Martin N Stienen (MN)

10624Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Jay Nathan (J)

12266University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Allen Ho (A)

10624Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Arjun V Pendharkar (AV)

10624Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Sheri Loo (S)

10624Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Jessica Aikin (J)

10624Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Gordon Li (G)

10624Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Atman Desai (A)

10624Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

John K Ratliff (JK)

10624Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Anand Veeravagu (A)

10624Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Classifications MeSH