Efficacy and safety of vedolizumab in ulcerative colitis in patients from Asian countries in the GEMINI 1 study.
Asia
Clinical efficacy
Colitis, ulcerative
Remission induction
Vedolizumab
Journal
Intestinal research
ISSN: 1598-9100
Titre abrégé: Intest Res
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101572802
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2021
Jan 2021
Historique:
received:
16
12
2019
accepted:
06
04
2020
pubmed:
3
9
2020
medline:
3
9
2020
entrez:
3
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The efficacy and safety of vedolizumab in moderate to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) have been demonstrated in the GEMINI 1 study (NCT00783718). This post-hoc exploratory analysis sought to establish the efficacy and safety of vedolizumab in a subgroup of patients from Asian countries with UC from GEMINI 1. Efficacy outcomes of interest were clinical response, clinical remission and mucosal healing at week 6 (induction phase); and clinical remission, durable clinical response, durable clinical remission, mucosal healing and glucocorticoid-free remission at week 52 (maintenance phase). Differences in outcome rates between vedolizumab and placebo in Asian countries (Hong Kong, India, Malaysia, Singapore, South Korea, and Taiwan) were assessed using descriptive analyses, and efficacy and safety compared between Asian and non-Asian countries. During induction, in Asian countries (n = 58), clinical response rates at week 6 with vedolizumab and placebo were 55.2% and 24.1%, respectively (difference 31.0%; 95% confidence interval: 7.2%-54.9%). In non-Asian countries (n = 316), response rates at week 6 with vedolizumab and placebo were 45.9% and 25.8%, respectively. During maintenance, in Asian countries, clinical remission rates at 52 weeks with vedolizumab administered every 8 weeks, vedolizumab administered every 4 weeks and placebo were 9.1%, 36.8%, and 31.6%, respectively; corresponding rates for mucosal healing were 45.5%, 47.4%, and 47.4%, respectively. Vedolizumab was well-tolerated; adverse event frequency was comparable in Asian and non-Asian countries. In patients from Asian countries, the efficacy and safety of vedolizumab in treatment of UC were broadly consistent with that in the overall study population.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND/AIMS
OBJECTIVE
The efficacy and safety of vedolizumab in moderate to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) have been demonstrated in the GEMINI 1 study (NCT00783718). This post-hoc exploratory analysis sought to establish the efficacy and safety of vedolizumab in a subgroup of patients from Asian countries with UC from GEMINI 1.
METHODS
METHODS
Efficacy outcomes of interest were clinical response, clinical remission and mucosal healing at week 6 (induction phase); and clinical remission, durable clinical response, durable clinical remission, mucosal healing and glucocorticoid-free remission at week 52 (maintenance phase). Differences in outcome rates between vedolizumab and placebo in Asian countries (Hong Kong, India, Malaysia, Singapore, South Korea, and Taiwan) were assessed using descriptive analyses, and efficacy and safety compared between Asian and non-Asian countries.
RESULTS
RESULTS
During induction, in Asian countries (n = 58), clinical response rates at week 6 with vedolizumab and placebo were 55.2% and 24.1%, respectively (difference 31.0%; 95% confidence interval: 7.2%-54.9%). In non-Asian countries (n = 316), response rates at week 6 with vedolizumab and placebo were 45.9% and 25.8%, respectively. During maintenance, in Asian countries, clinical remission rates at 52 weeks with vedolizumab administered every 8 weeks, vedolizumab administered every 4 weeks and placebo were 9.1%, 36.8%, and 31.6%, respectively; corresponding rates for mucosal healing were 45.5%, 47.4%, and 47.4%, respectively. Vedolizumab was well-tolerated; adverse event frequency was comparable in Asian and non-Asian countries.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
In patients from Asian countries, the efficacy and safety of vedolizumab in treatment of UC were broadly consistent with that in the overall study population.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32877600
pii: ir.2019.09159
doi: 10.5217/ir.2019.09159
pmc: PMC7873399
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
71-82Subventions
Organisme : Takeda Pharmaceuticals Company Ltd.
Références
Gut. 2017 Dec;66(12):2063-2068
pubmed: 27590995
Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2017 Oct;13(10):1039-1046
pubmed: 28876147
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Aug;108(8):1268-76
pubmed: 23649185
Am J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jan;114(1):107-115
pubmed: 30177785
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Aug;27(8):1266-80
pubmed: 22497584
Ann Gastroenterol. 2016 Jul-Sep;29(3):243-8
pubmed: 27366024
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2018 Oct 12;24(11):2431-2441
pubmed: 30312414
Hong Kong Med J. 2013 Feb;19(1):61-8
pubmed: 23378357
Mayo Clin Proc. 2014 Nov;89(11):1553-63
pubmed: 25199861
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2008 Apr;14(4):542-9
pubmed: 17941073
N Engl J Med. 2013 Aug 22;369(8):699-710
pubmed: 23964932
J Gastroenterol. 2018 Sep;53(9):1048-1064
pubmed: 29869016
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 26;14(2):e0212989
pubmed: 30807613
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Apr;32(4):769-777
pubmed: 27723166
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Feb;15(2):229-239.e5
pubmed: 27639327
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2012 Jul;18(7):1356-63
pubmed: 22162423
Intest Res. 2015 Jul;13(3):208-12
pubmed: 26130994