A head-to-head comparison of ixekizumab vs. guselkumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: 24-week efficacy and safety results from a randomized, double-blinded trial.


Journal

The British journal of dermatology
ISSN: 1365-2133
Titre abrégé: Br J Dermatol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0004041

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2021
Historique:
accepted: 27 08 2020
pubmed: 4 9 2020
medline: 2 7 2021
entrez: 4 9 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Significantly more patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis treated with the interleukin (IL)-17A inhibitor ixekizumab vs. the IL-23p19 inhibitor guselkumab in the IXORA-R head-to-head trial achieved 100% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 100) at week 12. To compare skin and nail clearance and patient-reported outcomes for ixekizumab vs. guselkumab, up to week 24. IXORA-R enrolled adults with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, defined as static Physician's Global Assessment ≥ 3, PASI ≥ 12 and involved body surface area ≥ 10%. Statistical comparisons were performed using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by pooled site. Time-to-first-event comparisons were performed using Kaplan-Meier analysis, and P-values were generated using adjusted log-rank tests stratified by treatment group. Cumulative days at clinical and patient-reported responses were compared by ancova. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03573323). Of the 1027 patients randomly assigned, 90% completed the trial (465 of 520 ixekizumab and 459 of 507 guselkumab). As early as week 2 and through week 16, more patients on ixekizumab achieved PASI 100 (P < 0·01). At week 24, ixekizumab was noninferior to guselkumab (50% vs. 52%, difference -2·3%), with no statistically significant difference in PASI 100 (P = 0·41). More patients receiving ixekizumab showed completely clear nails at week 24 (52% vs. 31%, P = 0·007). The median time to first PASI 50/75/90 and PASI 100 were 2 and 7·5 weeks shorter, respectively, for patients on ixekizumab vs. guselkumab (P < 0·001). Patients on ixekizumab also had a greater cumulative benefit, with more days at PASI 90 and 100, with Dermatology Life Quality Index of 0 or 1, and itch free (P < 0·05). The frequency of serious adverse events was 3% for each group, with no new safety signals. Ixekizumab was noninferior to guselkumab in complete skin clearance and superior in clearing nails at week 24. Ixekizumab cleared skin more rapidly in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, with a greater cumulative benefit, than guselkumab. Overall, the safety findings were consistent with the known safety profile for ixekizumab.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Significantly more patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis treated with the interleukin (IL)-17A inhibitor ixekizumab vs. the IL-23p19 inhibitor guselkumab in the IXORA-R head-to-head trial achieved 100% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 100) at week 12.
OBJECTIVES
To compare skin and nail clearance and patient-reported outcomes for ixekizumab vs. guselkumab, up to week 24.
METHODS
IXORA-R enrolled adults with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, defined as static Physician's Global Assessment ≥ 3, PASI ≥ 12 and involved body surface area ≥ 10%. Statistical comparisons were performed using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by pooled site. Time-to-first-event comparisons were performed using Kaplan-Meier analysis, and P-values were generated using adjusted log-rank tests stratified by treatment group. Cumulative days at clinical and patient-reported responses were compared by ancova. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03573323).
RESULTS
Of the 1027 patients randomly assigned, 90% completed the trial (465 of 520 ixekizumab and 459 of 507 guselkumab). As early as week 2 and through week 16, more patients on ixekizumab achieved PASI 100 (P < 0·01). At week 24, ixekizumab was noninferior to guselkumab (50% vs. 52%, difference -2·3%), with no statistically significant difference in PASI 100 (P = 0·41). More patients receiving ixekizumab showed completely clear nails at week 24 (52% vs. 31%, P = 0·007). The median time to first PASI 50/75/90 and PASI 100 were 2 and 7·5 weeks shorter, respectively, for patients on ixekizumab vs. guselkumab (P < 0·001). Patients on ixekizumab also had a greater cumulative benefit, with more days at PASI 90 and 100, with Dermatology Life Quality Index of 0 or 1, and itch free (P < 0·05). The frequency of serious adverse events was 3% for each group, with no new safety signals.
CONCLUSIONS
Ixekizumab was noninferior to guselkumab in complete skin clearance and superior in clearing nails at week 24. Ixekizumab cleared skin more rapidly in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, with a greater cumulative benefit, than guselkumab. Overall, the safety findings were consistent with the known safety profile for ixekizumab.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32880909
doi: 10.1111/bjd.19509
pmc: PMC8246960
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized 0
guselkumab 089658A12D
ixekizumab BTY153760O

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03573323']

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1047-1058

Subventions

Organisme : Eli Lilly and Company

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

© 2020 The Authors. British Journal of Dermatology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists.

Références

Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 Aug 21;12:1483-1503
pubmed: 30174415
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014 May;70(5):871-81.e1-30
pubmed: 24576585
Lancet. 2019 Sep 7;394(10201):831-839
pubmed: 31402114
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2019 Dec;9(4):785-797
pubmed: 31630336
Arch Dermatol Res. 2016 Mar;308(2):69-78
pubmed: 26688112
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 Apr;82(4):927-935
pubmed: 31712178
Dermatol Ther. 2018 May;31(3):e12589
pubmed: 29512290
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019 Feb;33(2):333-339
pubmed: 30198588
J Dermatolog Treat. 2017 May;28(3):188-199
pubmed: 27569650
Br J Dermatol. 2020 Jun;182(6):1348-1358
pubmed: 31887225
Br J Dermatol. 2010 Sep;163(3):580-5
pubmed: 20456340
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2020 Feb;10(1):133-150
pubmed: 31749092
JAMA Dermatol. 2018 Jun 1;154(6):676-683
pubmed: 29799960
Acta Derm Venereol. 2016 May;96(4):514-20
pubmed: 26837052
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019 Nov;33(11):2168-2178
pubmed: 31304993
Br J Dermatol. 2014 Nov;171(5):1215-9
pubmed: 24749812
J Dermatolog Treat. 2020 Apr 2;:1-15
pubmed: 32202445
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2014 Dec;28(12):1690-5
pubmed: 24422908
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2020 Jun;10(3):431-447
pubmed: 32200512
J Dermatolog Treat. 2020 Nov;31(7):662-679
pubmed: 31014154
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017 Mar;31(3):477-482
pubmed: 27910156
J Invest Dermatol. 2005 Oct;125(4):659-64
pubmed: 16185263
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 Apr;82(4):936-945
pubmed: 31809827
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019 Apr;33(4):700-708
pubmed: 30388318
Dermatology. 1996;193(4):300-3
pubmed: 8993953

Auteurs

A Blauvelt (A)

Oregon Medical Research Center, Portland, OR, USA.

C Leonardi (C)

Central Dermatology, St Louis, MO, USA.

B Elewski (B)

Deparment of Dermatology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA.

J J Crowley (JJ)

Bakersfield Dermatology and Skin Cancer Medical Group, Bakersfield, CA, USA.

L C Guenther (LC)

Guenther Research Inc, London, ON, Canada.

M Gooderham (M)

SKiN Centre for Dermatology, Peterborough, ON, Canada.

R G Langley (RG)

Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.

R Vender (R)

Dermatrials Research Inc, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

A Pinter (A)

Clinic for Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

C E M Griffiths (CEM)

Dermatology Centre, Salford Royal Hospital, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Y Tada (Y)

Department of Dermatology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

H Elmaraghy (H)

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

R G Lima (RG)

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

G Gallo (G)

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

L Renda (L)

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

R Burge (R)

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

S Y Park (SY)

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

B Zhu (B)

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

K Papp (K)

Probity Medical Research, Inc., Waterloo, ON, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH