Performance of the German version of the PARCA-R questionnaire as a developmental screening tool in two-year-old very preterm infants.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
20
02
2020
accepted:
01
07
2020
entrez:
4
9
2020
pubmed:
4
9
2020
medline:
22
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To validate and test a German version of the revised Parent Report of Children's Abilities questionnaire (PARCA-R). Multicentre cross-sectional study. Parents of infants born <32 gestational weeks, completed the PARCA-R within three weeks before the follow-up assessment of their child at age two years. Infants were assessed using the Mental Development Index (MDI) of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development 2nd edition (BSID-II). Pearson correlation between the Parent Report Composite (PRC) of the PARCA-R and MDI was tested. The optimal PRC cut-off for predicting moderate-to-severe mental delay, defined as MDI<70, was identified through the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. PARCA-R and BSID-II data were collected from 154 consecutive infants [51% girls, mean (SD) gestational age 29.0 (2.0) weeks, birth weight 1174 (345) grams] at 23.2 (1.6) months of corrected age. The PRC score [70.5 (31.1)] correlated with the MDI [92.2 (17.3); R = 0.54; p < 0.0001]. The optimal PRC cut-off for identifying mental delay was 44 with 0.81 (0.54-0.96) sensitivity (95%-CI), 0.81 (0.74-0.87) specificity, area under the ROC curve of 0.840 (0.729-0.952). The German version of the PARCA-R had good validity with the BSID-II and PCR scores < 44 proved optimal discriminatory power for the identification of mental delay at two years of corrected age.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32881866
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236289
pii: PONE-D-20-05014
pmc: PMC7470267
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0236289Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Early Hum Dev. 2014 Dec;90(12):897-900
pubmed: 25463839
Pediatrics. 2014 Jul;134(1):e55-62
pubmed: 24982100
Early Hum Dev. 2006 Mar;82(3):173-83
pubmed: 16504424
Dev Med Child Neurol Suppl. 2007 Feb;109:8-14
pubmed: 17370477
Early Hum Dev. 2012 Mar;88(3):159-63
pubmed: 21862246
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2012 Jun;15(2):113-28
pubmed: 22262040
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2019 Oct;3(10):705-712
pubmed: 31402196
BMC Pediatr. 2014 Nov 17;14:279
pubmed: 25399544
Pediatrics. 2006 Jun;117(6):2080-92
pubmed: 16740851
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006 Jun;6(3):180-5
pubmed: 16670511
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008 Jan;50(1):58-62
pubmed: 18173632
J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 Dec;46(12):1417-32
pubmed: 8263569
Dev Med Child Neurol. 1989 Aug;31(4):440-56
pubmed: 2680687
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2012 Mar;54(3):254-9
pubmed: 22188172
BMC Pediatr. 2012 Dec 28;12:198
pubmed: 23272671
Occup Ther Health Care. 2014 Oct;28(4):371-81
pubmed: 25050830
Lancet. 2008 Jan 19;371(9608):261-9
pubmed: 18207020
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;60(1):34-42
pubmed: 17161752
BMC Res Notes. 2014 Apr 08;7:219
pubmed: 24716630
Dev Med Child Neurol. 1997 Apr;39(4):214-23
pubmed: 9183258
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2004 Jun;46(6):389-97
pubmed: 15174530
Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2007 Oct;12(5):363-73
pubmed: 17625996
Arch Dis Child. 2006 Aug;91(8):675-9
pubmed: 16638783
Arch Dis Child. 2013 Dec;98(12):955-8
pubmed: 24030249
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 24;(11):CD005495
pubmed: 26597166