The effectiveness and safety of computed tomographic peritoneography and video-assisted thoracic surgery for hydrothorax in peritoneal dialysis patients: A retrospective cohort study in Japan.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
27
05
2020
accepted:
19
08
2020
entrez:
4
9
2020
pubmed:
4
9
2020
medline:
28
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Albeit uncommon, hydrothorax is an important complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD). Due to paucity of evidence for optimal treatment, this study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of computed tomographic (CT) peritoneography and surgical intervention involving video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for hydrothorax in a retrospective cohort of patients who underwent PD in Japan. Of the 982 patients who underwent PD from six centers in Japan between 2007 and 2019, 25 (2.5%) with diagnosed hydrothorax were enrolled in this study. PD withdrawal rates were compared between patients who underwent VATS for diaphragm repair (surgical group) and those who did not (non-surgical group) using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. The surgical and non-surgical groups comprised a total of 11 (44%) and 14 (56%) patients, respectively. Following hydrothorax diagnosis by thoracentesis and detection of penetrated sites on the diaphragm using CT peritoneography, VATS was performed at a median time of 31 days (interquartile range [IQR], 20-96 days). During follow-up (median, 26 months; IQR, 10-51 months), 9 (64.3%) and 2 (18.2%) patients in the non-surgical and surgical groups, respectively, withdrew from PD (P = 0.021). There were no surgery-related complications or hydrothorax relapse in the surgical group. This study demonstrated the effectiveness and safety of CT peritoneography and VATS for hydrothorax. This approach may be useful in hydrothorax cases to avoid early drop out of PD and continue PD in the long term. Further studies are warranted to confirm these results.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32881941
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238602
pii: PONE-D-20-15940
pmc: PMC7470296
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0238602Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Am J Nephrol. 1989;9(5):363-7
pubmed: 2679094
Semin Dial. 2003 Sep-Oct;16(5):389-94
pubmed: 12969393
Kyobu Geka. 2014 Oct;67(11):967-70
pubmed: 25292372
Perit Dial Int. 1998 Jan-Feb;18(1):5-10
pubmed: 9527025
Chest. 1992 Dec;102(6):1855-60
pubmed: 1446502
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992 Nov;159(5):983-9
pubmed: 1344976
Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2004 Jul;10(4):315-9
pubmed: 15220759
Clin Nephrol. 1984 Mar;21(3):191-3
pubmed: 6705282
Adv Perit Dial. 1989;5:81-3
pubmed: 2577434
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2003 Apr;18(4):804-8
pubmed: 12637652
Semin Dial. 2017 Jan;30(1):63-68
pubmed: 27596540
Perit Dial Int. 2004 Sep-Oct;24(5):466-70
pubmed: 15490987
Surg Case Rep. 2019 Feb 19;5(1):34
pubmed: 30783792
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012 Oct;15(4):788-9
pubmed: 22753435
Semin Dial. 2020 Mar;33(2):163-169
pubmed: 32163640
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1999 Jun;14(6):1590-2
pubmed: 10383035
Perit Dial Int. 2010 Jan-Feb;30(1):13-8
pubmed: 20056973
Adv Perit Dial. 2004;20:132-6
pubmed: 15384813
Acta Med Croatica. 2011 Oct;65 Suppl 3:95-8
pubmed: 23120824