Machine-learning strategies for testing patterns of morphological variation in small samples: sexual dimorphism in gray wolf (Canis lupus) crania.
Automated identification
Carnivores
Convolution neural networks
Ecomorphology
Machine learning
Morphometrics
Shape analysis
Journal
BMC biology
ISSN: 1741-7007
Titre abrégé: BMC Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101190720
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 09 2020
03 09 2020
Historique:
received:
16
02
2020
accepted:
20
07
2020
entrez:
5
9
2020
pubmed:
5
9
2020
medline:
5
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Studies of mammalian sexual dimorphism have traditionally involved the measurement of selected dimensions of particular skeletal elements and use of single data-analysis procedures. Consequently, such studies have been limited by a variety of both practical and conceptual constraints. To compare and contrast what might be gained from a more exploratory, multifactorial approach to the quantitative assessment of form-variation, images of a small sample of modern Israeli gray wolf (Canis lupus) crania were analyzed via elliptical Fourier analysis of cranial outlines, a Naïve Bayes machine-learning approach to the analysis of these same outline data, and a deep-learning analysis of whole images in which all aspects of these cranial morphologies were represented. The statistical significance and stability of each discriminant result were tested using bootstrap and jackknife procedures. Our results reveal no evidence for statistically significant sexual size dimorphism, but significant sex-mediated shape dimorphism. These are consistent with the findings of prior wolf sexual dimorphism studies and extend these studies by identifying new aspects of dimorphic variation. Additionally, our results suggest that shape-based sexual dimorphism in the C. lupus cranial complex may be more widespread morphologically than had been appreciated by previous researchers. Our results suggest that size and shape dimorphism can be detected in small samples and may be dissociated in mammalian morphologies. This result is particularly noteworthy in that it implies there may be a need to refine allometric hypothesis tests that seek to account for phenotypic sexual dimorphism. The methods we employed in this investigation are fully generalizable and can be applied to a wide range of biological materials and could facilitate the rapid evaluation of a diverse array of morphological/phenomic hypotheses.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Studies of mammalian sexual dimorphism have traditionally involved the measurement of selected dimensions of particular skeletal elements and use of single data-analysis procedures. Consequently, such studies have been limited by a variety of both practical and conceptual constraints. To compare and contrast what might be gained from a more exploratory, multifactorial approach to the quantitative assessment of form-variation, images of a small sample of modern Israeli gray wolf (Canis lupus) crania were analyzed via elliptical Fourier analysis of cranial outlines, a Naïve Bayes machine-learning approach to the analysis of these same outline data, and a deep-learning analysis of whole images in which all aspects of these cranial morphologies were represented. The statistical significance and stability of each discriminant result were tested using bootstrap and jackknife procedures.
RESULTS
Our results reveal no evidence for statistically significant sexual size dimorphism, but significant sex-mediated shape dimorphism. These are consistent with the findings of prior wolf sexual dimorphism studies and extend these studies by identifying new aspects of dimorphic variation. Additionally, our results suggest that shape-based sexual dimorphism in the C. lupus cranial complex may be more widespread morphologically than had been appreciated by previous researchers.
CONCLUSION
Our results suggest that size and shape dimorphism can be detected in small samples and may be dissociated in mammalian morphologies. This result is particularly noteworthy in that it implies there may be a need to refine allometric hypothesis tests that seek to account for phenotypic sexual dimorphism. The methods we employed in this investigation are fully generalizable and can be applied to a wide range of biological materials and could facilitate the rapid evaluation of a diverse array of morphological/phenomic hypotheses.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32883273
doi: 10.1186/s12915-020-00832-1
pii: 10.1186/s12915-020-00832-1
pmc: PMC7470621
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
113Références
Evolution. 1974 Jun;28(2):191-220
pubmed: 28563271
Nature. 2015 May 28;521(7553):436-44
pubmed: 26017442
J Forensic Sci. 2008 Mar;53(2):269-78
pubmed: 18366560
Nat Rev Genet. 2010 Dec;11(12):855-66
pubmed: 21085204
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 28;12(11):e0188806
pubmed: 29182683
Genetics. 2009 Apr;181(4):1493-505
pubmed: 19189949
Acta Trop. 2014 Oct;138 Suppl:S49-55
pubmed: 24727206
Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Dec 7;274(1628):2971-9
pubmed: 17878139
J Anat. 1992 Aug;181 ( Pt 1):133-7
pubmed: 1294562
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Feb 21;109(8):E463-70
pubmed: 22232662
J Cogn Neurosci. 1991 Winter;3(1):71-86
pubmed: 23964806
PLoS Biol. 2015 Jan 06;13(1):e1002033
pubmed: 25562316
J Anat. 2014 Jul;225(1):1-11
pubmed: 24810384
Trends Genet. 2006 Oct;22(10):537-44
pubmed: 16934357
Sci Adv. 2019 Aug 14;5(8):eaaw4967
pubmed: 31453326
Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2017 Apr;300(4):698-705
pubmed: 28297185
Trends Ecol Evol. 2012 Feb;27(2):78-84
pubmed: 22189359
J R Soc Interface. 2018 Apr;15(141):
pubmed: 29618526
PLoS Comput Biol. 2007 Jun;3(6):e116
pubmed: 17604446
Evolution. 2016 Apr;70(4):767-80
pubmed: 26969835
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2013 May;16(2):180-7
pubmed: 23578473
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1966 Nov;41(4):587-640
pubmed: 5342162
J Evol Biol. 2010 Jul;23(7):1528-37
pubmed: 20524949
Vision Res. 2011 Jul 1;51(13):1538-51
pubmed: 21329719
Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1979 Sep 21;205(1161):581-98
pubmed: 42062
Syst Biol. 2016 Nov;65(6):1096-1106
pubmed: 27288476
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1982 Oct;59(2):139-49
pubmed: 7149015
J Anim Ecol. 2009 May;78(3):532-9
pubmed: 19175444
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004 Apr 29;359(1444):655-67
pubmed: 15253351
J Anat. 1992 Jun;180 ( Pt 3):419-24
pubmed: 1487435
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Mar 22;113(12):3305-10
pubmed: 26951664