Real-world analyses of therapy discontinuation of checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic melanoma patients.
Aged
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
/ therapeutic use
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
/ therapeutic use
Female
Humans
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
/ therapeutic use
Ipilimumab
/ therapeutic use
Male
Melanoma
/ drug therapy
Middle Aged
Nivolumab
/ therapeutic use
Skin Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Withholding Treatment
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 09 2020
03 09 2020
Historique:
received:
01
04
2020
accepted:
22
07
2020
entrez:
5
9
2020
pubmed:
5
9
2020
medline:
16
3
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The 'real-world' patient population of metastatic melanoma is not fully represented in clinical trials investigating checkpoint inhibitors. We described therapy discontinuation in an unselected population-based cohort of adults with metastatic melanoma who started therapy with pembrolizumab, nivolumab, or nivolumab/ipilimumab from January 2015 to August 2017. Therapy discontinuation was defined as a gap between doses beyond 120 days, and/or initiation of another cancer therapy. We estimated drug-specific rate ratios for therapy discontinuation adjusted for age, sex, comorbidities, health care use, and past cancer therapies. We included 876 metastatic melanoma patients initiating pembrolizumab (44.3%), nivolumab/ipilimumab (31.2%), and nivolumab (24.5%). At 12 months of follow-up, the probabilities of therapy discontinuation were 49.9% (95% confidence interval, CI 43.6-56.5) for pembrolizumab, 58.8% (95% CI 50.5-67.3) for nivolumab, and 59.2% (95% CI 51.7-66.8) for nivolumab/ipilimumab. Stratified analyses based on prior cancer therapy, brain metastases at baseline, and sex showed similar trends. In multivariable analyses, compared with pembrolizumab, patients starting nivolumab (rate ratio 1.38, 95% CI 1.08-1.77) or nivolumab/ipilimumab (rate ratio 1.30, 95% CI 1.02-1.65) were more likely to discontinue therapy. Our findings indicate frequent discontinuations of checkpoint inhibitors at one year. The lower discontinuation associated with pembrolizumab should be confirmed in further studies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32884119
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71788-z
pii: 10.1038/s41598-020-71788-z
pmc: PMC7471311
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
0
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
0
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
0
Ipilimumab
0
Nivolumab
31YO63LBSN
pembrolizumab
DPT0O3T46P
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
14607Références
National Institutes of Health. National Cancer Institute. Cancer Stat Facts: Melanoma of the Skin. https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/melan.html .
Miller, K. D. et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J. Clin. 69(5), 363–385 (2019).
doi: 10.3322/caac.21565
National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines Insights. Melanoma, Version 4.2014.
National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines in Oncology. Melanoma, Version 3.2016.
Larkin, J., Hodi, F. S. & Wolchok, J. D. Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab or monotherapy in untreated melanoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 373, 13 (2015).
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1504030
National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines in Oncology. Cutaneous Melanoma, Version 2.2019.
Whitman, E. D. et al. Treatment patterns and outcomes for patients with advanced melanoma in US oncology clinical practices. Future Oncol. 15, 459–471 (2019).
doi: 10.2217/fon-2018-0620
Shah, S., Raskin, L., Cohan, D., Freeman, M. & Hamid, O. Treatment patterns of malignant melanoma in the United States from 2011 to 2016: a retrospective cohort study. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 36, 63–72 (2020).
doi: 10.1080/03007995.2019.1662688
Tarhini, A. et al. Treatment patterns and outcomes for patients with unresectable stage III and metastatic melanoma in the USA. J. Comp. Eff. Res. 8, 461–473 (2019).
doi: 10.2217/cer-2019-0003
Cowey, C. L., Liu, F. X., Boyd, M., Aguilar, K. M. & Krepler, C. Real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes among patients with advanced melanoma: a retrospective, community oncology-based cohort study (a STROBE-compliant article). Medicine 98, e16328 (2019).
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016328
Donia, M. et al. The majority of patients with metastatic melanoma are not represented in pivotal phase III immunotherapy trials. Eur. J. Cancer 74, 89–95 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.12.017
Danson, S. et al. Are we over-treating with checkpoint inhibitors?. Br. J. Cancer 121, 629–630 (2019).
doi: 10.1038/s41416-019-0570-y
Jansen, Y. J. L. et al. Discontinuation of anti-PD-1 antibody therapy in the absence of disease progression or treatment limiting toxicity: clinical outcomes in advanced melanoma. Ann. Oncol. 30, 1154–1161 (2019).
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz110
Luke, J. J., Flaherty, K. T., Ribas, A. & Long, G. V. Targeted agents and immunotherapies: optimizing outcomes in melanoma. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 14, 463–482 (2017).
doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.43
Villadolid, J. & Amin, A. Immune checkpoint inhibitors in clinical practice: update on management of immune-related toxicities. Transl. Lung Cancer Res. 4, 560–575 (2015).
pubmed: 26629425
pmcid: 4630514
Brahmer, J. R. et al. Management of immune-related adverse events in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. J. Clin. Oncol. 36, 1714–1768 (2018).
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.77.6385
Robert, C. et al. Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 372, 2521–2532 (2015).
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1503093
Moser, J. C. et al. Comparative-effectiveness of pembrolizumab vs. nivolumab for patients with metastatic melanoma. Acta Oncol. 59, 434–437 (2020).
doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2020.1712473
Vosoughi, E. et al. Survival and clinical outcomes of patients with melanoma brain metastasis in the era of checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies. BMC Cancer 18, 490 (2018).
doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4374-x
Sloot, S. et al. Improved survival of patients with melanoma brain metastases in the era of targeted BRAF and immune checkpoint therapies. Cancer 124, 297–305 (2018).
doi: 10.1002/cncr.30946
Milsch, L. et al. Patterns of disease control and survival in patients with melanoma brain metastases undergoing immune-checkpoint blockade. Eur. J. Cancer. 99, 58–65 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.05.012
Klein, S. L. & Flanagan, K. L. Sex differences in immune responses. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 16, 626–638 (2016).
doi: 10.1038/nri.2016.90
Duma, N. et al. Sex differences in tolerability to anti-programmed cell death protein 1 therapy in patients with metastatic melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer: are we all equal?. Oncologist 24, e1148–e1155 (2019).
pubmed: 31036771
pmcid: 6853107
Ma, Q. et al. Patterns of use of systemic therapies among patients with metastatic melanoma: a retrospective claims database analysis in the United States. J. Dermatolog. Treat. 28, 549–553 (2017).
doi: 10.1080/09546634.2016.1277176