Psychometric Properties of the Persian Questionnaire for Evaluation of Clinical Teaching at Outpatient Settings.
education
evaluation
medical
reliability
undergraduate
validity
Journal
Advances in medical education and practice
ISSN: 1179-7258
Titre abrégé: Adv Med Educ Pract
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101562700
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
06
05
2020
accepted:
30
07
2020
entrez:
5
9
2020
pubmed:
5
9
2020
medline:
5
9
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To assess the validity and reliability of the Persian Outpatient Clinical Teaching Evaluation (OCTE) questionnaire, in order to evaluate clinical teaching for undergraduate medical students. This was a methodological study conducted in Tabriz University of Medical Sciences in 2018. To assess the validity of the questionnaire, ten academic staff who had received master's degrees in medical education were chosen by convenience sampling. The first draft of the Persian questionnaire was derived from the Ministry of Health's clinical teaching standards booklet. The questionnaire consisted of just 15 obligatory items in the first draft of the questionnaire. Subsequently, the questionnaire was modified to be used in teaching outpatient clinics. Content validity indices were calculated. Subsequently, the modified questionnaires were given to 92 academic staff in Imam-Reza Hospital's outpatient clinics. We applied principle component analysis (PCA) and Varimax rotation for exploratory factor analysis (EFA). In order to confirm the EFA, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used. Cronbach's alpha method, the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and test-retest reliability were used to assess the reliability. The overall content validity ratio (CVR), content validity index (CVI), and impact score (IS) were 0.78, 0.79, and 3.26, respectively. Out of 92 academic staff, 85 participated. The Keizer-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy for data was 0.726 ( The study demonstrated that the Persian clinical teaching questionnaire had optimal psychometric properties. Thus, application of this questionnaire at outpatient settings can be helpful.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32884393
doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S261350
pii: 261350
pmc: PMC7442966
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
549-555Informations de copyright
© 2020 Baradaran Binazir et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors report that they have no conflicts of interest.
Références
J Caring Sci. 2017 Jun 01;6(2):183-186
pubmed: 28680872
Med Teach. 2003 Mar;25(2):127-30
pubmed: 12745518
Int J Med Educ. 2018 Jun 22;9:175-181
pubmed: 29936493
Emerg Med J. 2010 Jan;27(1):32-6
pubmed: 20029004
Arch Iran Med. 2019 Jan 01;22(1):11-23
pubmed: 30821156
Oman Med J. 2019 Sep;34(5):427-433
pubmed: 31555419
Med Teach. 2011;33(6):e290-6
pubmed: 21609164
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2018 Jan;6(1):14-21
pubmed: 29344525
Electron Physician. 2015 Nov 20;7(7):1427-34
pubmed: 26767094
Med Teach. 2005 Jun;27(4):302-15
pubmed: 16024412
Perspect Med Educ. 2014 Apr;3(2):76-88
pubmed: 24049043
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Aug 28;14:179
pubmed: 25164309
BJGP Open. 2018 Apr 24;2(1):bjgpopen18X101361
pubmed: 30564703
Korean J Med Educ. 2016 Sep;28(3):281-8
pubmed: 27363503
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2016 Sep 29;7:559-566
pubmed: 27729824