Developing a theory-based multimedia intervention for schools to improve young people's asthma: my asthma in school (MAIS).
Adolescents
Asthma
Behavioural change
Engagement
Gamification
Intervention
Multimedia
Self-management
Theory-based
Young people
Journal
Pilot and feasibility studies
ISSN: 2055-5784
Titre abrégé: Pilot Feasibility Stud
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101676536
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
14
10
2019
accepted:
19
08
2020
entrez:
5
9
2020
pubmed:
5
9
2020
medline:
5
9
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Asthma control in adolescents is low with half of the young people in a London study identified as having suboptimal control when measured using the Asthma Control Test. Control of asthma symptoms can be improved by addressing barriers to good self-management, such as poor understanding of asthma and adherence to medication. The aim of this study was therefore to develop the My Asthma in School (MAIS) intervention for the improvement of asthma control and self-management in adolescents and to test its initial feasibility. The intervention intended to combine a strong focus on theory with a design specifically aimed to engage adolescents. The intervention development was based on previous qualitative and quantitative findings, and on guidelines from the Medical Research Council for the development of complex interventions. The COM-B (Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour) model was applied to inform the design of intervention elements. Behavioural targets were identified from existing barriers to good asthma self-management and were then used to guide the development of engaging intervention elements, which were described using the Behavioural Change Technique (BCT) Taxonomy version 1. Adolescents were involved throughout this process. The MAIS intervention was tested in a feasibility phase in London secondary schools with adolescents aged between 11 and 13. The complex school-based MAIS intervention comprised a first school visit from a theatre group, who conducted a workshop with all year 7-8 students and addressed peer understanding and attitudes to asthma. The second visit included four self-management workshops for adolescents with asthma, including games, short-films and role play activities. Forty different types of techniques to change behaviour were applied, totalling 163 instances of BCT use across intervention elements, addressing all areas of capability, opportunity and motivation. In this initial feasibility study, 1814 adolescents with and without asthma from nine schools received the theatre intervention visit; 23 adolescents with asthma from one of the schools attended the workshop visit. The intervention was found acceptable and engaging, and 91.4% of participants agreed that the workshops changed how they think or feel about asthma. This study demonstrates development and initial feasibility of a complex theory-based intervention, and how it can combine engaging media and interactive elements, to achieve a multi-directional approach to behavioural change. However more work is needed to assess the feasibility of trial processes, including recruitment and delivery format of the workshops.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Asthma control in adolescents is low with half of the young people in a London study identified as having suboptimal control when measured using the Asthma Control Test. Control of asthma symptoms can be improved by addressing barriers to good self-management, such as poor understanding of asthma and adherence to medication. The aim of this study was therefore to develop the My Asthma in School (MAIS) intervention for the improvement of asthma control and self-management in adolescents and to test its initial feasibility. The intervention intended to combine a strong focus on theory with a design specifically aimed to engage adolescents.
METHODS
METHODS
The intervention development was based on previous qualitative and quantitative findings, and on guidelines from the Medical Research Council for the development of complex interventions. The COM-B (Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour) model was applied to inform the design of intervention elements. Behavioural targets were identified from existing barriers to good asthma self-management and were then used to guide the development of engaging intervention elements, which were described using the Behavioural Change Technique (BCT) Taxonomy version 1. Adolescents were involved throughout this process. The MAIS intervention was tested in a feasibility phase in London secondary schools with adolescents aged between 11 and 13.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The complex school-based MAIS intervention comprised a first school visit from a theatre group, who conducted a workshop with all year 7-8 students and addressed peer understanding and attitudes to asthma. The second visit included four self-management workshops for adolescents with asthma, including games, short-films and role play activities. Forty different types of techniques to change behaviour were applied, totalling 163 instances of BCT use across intervention elements, addressing all areas of capability, opportunity and motivation. In this initial feasibility study, 1814 adolescents with and without asthma from nine schools received the theatre intervention visit; 23 adolescents with asthma from one of the schools attended the workshop visit. The intervention was found acceptable and engaging, and 91.4% of participants agreed that the workshops changed how they think or feel about asthma.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
This study demonstrates development and initial feasibility of a complex theory-based intervention, and how it can combine engaging media and interactive elements, to achieve a multi-directional approach to behavioural change. However more work is needed to assess the feasibility of trial processes, including recruitment and delivery format of the workshops.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32884832
doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00670-6
pii: 670
pmc: PMC7465390
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
122Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Références
Respir Med. 2004 Oct;98 Suppl B:S35-40
pubmed: 15481287
J Sch Nurs. 2011 Aug;27(4):282-92
pubmed: 21478414
Paediatr Respir Rev. 2014 Jun;15(2):146-53
pubmed: 23972334
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1997 Nov;100(5):613-7
pubmed: 9389290
BMJ. 2011 Mar 08;342:d1277
pubmed: 21385800
BMJ. 2003 Jun 14;326(7402):1308-9
pubmed: 12805167
Implement Sci. 2011 Apr 23;6:42
pubmed: 21513547
J Asthma. 2017 Dec;54(10):1033-1040
pubmed: 28332884
Internet Interv. 2016 Nov 02;6:89-106
pubmed: 30135818
J Sch Health. 2008 Dec;78(12):655-65
pubmed: 19000242
BMJ. 2015 Mar 05;350:h996
pubmed: 25742964
Pediatrics. 2009 Aug;124(2):729-42
pubmed: 19651589
J Adv Nurs. 2008 Jul;63(2):116-31
pubmed: 18537845
Front Psychiatry. 2017 Jan 10;7:215
pubmed: 28119636
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 28;1:CD011651
pubmed: 30687940
Ann Behav Med. 2013 Aug;46(1):81-95
pubmed: 23512568
J Sch Health. 2006 Aug;76(6):291-6
pubmed: 16918857
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009 Jun;123(6):1335-41
pubmed: 19395075
Appl Ergon. 2017 Jan;58:224-237
pubmed: 27633217
PLoS Biol. 2015 Sep 04;13(9):e1002240
pubmed: 26340279