Negative effects of blood flow restriction on perceptual responses to walking in healthy young adults: A pilot study.
Applied psychology
Cardiovascular system
Clinical psychology
Cognitive psychology
Enjoyment
Exercise
Exercise adherence
Mood
Musculoskeletal system
Perceived exertion
Physiology
Psychological response
Journal
Heliyon
ISSN: 2405-8440
Titre abrégé: Heliyon
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101672560
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2020
Aug 2020
Historique:
received:
12
06
2020
revised:
06
08
2020
accepted:
13
08
2020
entrez:
5
9
2020
pubmed:
5
9
2020
medline:
5
9
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Blood flow restriction (BFR) exercise is recognized as a beneficial strategy in increasing skeletal muscle mass and strength. These positive effects can also be obtained by a mild exercise mode such as walking. However, BFR exacerbates some perceptual responses, such as perceived exertion response, induced by exercise. Despite this knowledge, the negative effects of BFR exercise on major perceptual parameters related to exercise adherence remain unknown. Furthermore, compared with other exercise modes (e.g., resistance exercise), little is known regarding the effects of BFR on perceptual responses to walking. To clarify these issues, we examined the effects of BFR walking on perceptual parameters, including exercise adherence-related parameters. Eighteen healthy, young males performed both BFR and non-BFR (NBFR) walking on a treadmill in a crossover design. Exercise was performed as five sets of 2-min walking with 1-min rest intervals. BFR walking was performed with 200 mmHg pressure cuffs placed around the proximal region of the thighs. NBFR walking was performed without pressure cuffs. Ratings of perceived exertion and leg discomfort were significantly higher during BFR walking than during NBFR walking. Affect and task motivation were significantly lower during BFR walking than during NBFR walking; by contrast, perceived pain was significantly higher during BFR walking than during NBFR walking. Enjoyment immediately after walking was significantly lower with BFR than with NBFR. These findings suggest that BFR walking induces greater responses of perceptual parameters, including exercise adherence-related parameters, than does NBFR walking. Therefore, BFR walking may decrease adherence to this exercise. To further popularize BFR exercise, further studies are needed to develop effective strategies to minimize the BFR-induced negative effects on perceptual responses.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Blood flow restriction (BFR) exercise is recognized as a beneficial strategy in increasing skeletal muscle mass and strength. These positive effects can also be obtained by a mild exercise mode such as walking. However, BFR exacerbates some perceptual responses, such as perceived exertion response, induced by exercise. Despite this knowledge, the negative effects of BFR exercise on major perceptual parameters related to exercise adherence remain unknown. Furthermore, compared with other exercise modes (e.g., resistance exercise), little is known regarding the effects of BFR on perceptual responses to walking. To clarify these issues, we examined the effects of BFR walking on perceptual parameters, including exercise adherence-related parameters.
METHODS
METHODS
Eighteen healthy, young males performed both BFR and non-BFR (NBFR) walking on a treadmill in a crossover design. Exercise was performed as five sets of 2-min walking with 1-min rest intervals. BFR walking was performed with 200 mmHg pressure cuffs placed around the proximal region of the thighs. NBFR walking was performed without pressure cuffs.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Ratings of perceived exertion and leg discomfort were significantly higher during BFR walking than during NBFR walking. Affect and task motivation were significantly lower during BFR walking than during NBFR walking; by contrast, perceived pain was significantly higher during BFR walking than during NBFR walking. Enjoyment immediately after walking was significantly lower with BFR than with NBFR.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
These findings suggest that BFR walking induces greater responses of perceptual parameters, including exercise adherence-related parameters, than does NBFR walking. Therefore, BFR walking may decrease adherence to this exercise. To further popularize BFR exercise, further studies are needed to develop effective strategies to minimize the BFR-induced negative effects on perceptual responses.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32885079
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04745
pii: S2405-8440(20)31588-7
pii: e04745
pmc: PMC7452548
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e04745Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Author(s).
Références
Circ Heart Fail. 2019 Dec;12(12):e006427
pubmed: 31830830
Am J Prev Med. 2001 Aug;21(2):110-7
pubmed: 11457630
Br J Sports Med. 2015 Apr;49(8):556-60
pubmed: 23729175
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2015 Nov;309(9):H1440-52
pubmed: 26342064
Sports Med. 2011 Aug 1;41(8):641-71
pubmed: 21780850
J Sci Med Sport. 2009 Jan;12(1):107-12
pubmed: 18083635
Sports Med. 2015 Mar;45(3):313-25
pubmed: 25430600
Physiol Behav. 2019 Nov 1;211:112677
pubmed: 31499050
Ann Rheum Dis. 1978 Aug;37(4):378-81
pubmed: 686873
Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2014 May;211(1):97-106
pubmed: 24479982
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015 May;47(5):1052-60
pubmed: 25202850
Physiol Behav. 2018 Oct 1;194:170-176
pubmed: 29807054
Physiol Behav. 1995 Jan;57(1):1-4
pubmed: 7878100
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005 Dec;37(12):2032-7
pubmed: 16331126
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2011 Mar;66(3):257-63
pubmed: 20974731
J Strength Cond Res. 2015 Nov;29(11):3067-74
pubmed: 26506060
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2014 Jul;34(4):308-16
pubmed: 24237757
J Sports Sci. 2011 Mar;29(6):547-53
pubmed: 21360405
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2018 Jul;118(7):1473-1480
pubmed: 29725755
N Engl J Med. 2002 Mar 14;346(11):793-801
pubmed: 11893790
J Sci Med Sport. 2016 Aug;19(8):669-75
pubmed: 26463594
Front Physiol. 2019 May 15;10:533
pubmed: 31156448
Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1987;56(6):679-85
pubmed: 3678222
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1983;15(6):523-8
pubmed: 6656563
Pain. 2011 Oct;152(10):2399-404
pubmed: 21856077
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982;14(5):377-81
pubmed: 7154893
J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2007 Jun;29(3):281-309
pubmed: 17876968
Eur J Sport Sci. 2018 Apr;18(3):387-396
pubmed: 29341849
Am J Hum Biol. 1994;6(2):161-170
pubmed: 28548275
Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2018 Feb 1;30(1):115-123
pubmed: 28787247
J Sports Sci. 2019 Aug;37(16):1857-1864
pubmed: 30961440
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2014 Feb;28(1):93-117
pubmed: 24792947
J Pers Assess. 1983 Jun;47(3):305-6
pubmed: 6886962
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 26;8(11):e79965
pubmed: 24302993
J Strength Cond Res. 2009 Sep;23(6):1752-7
pubmed: 19675487
BMJ. 2008 Jul 01;337:a439
pubmed: 18595904
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2019 Aug;29(8):1161-1173
pubmed: 31050032
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2009 Apr;106(4):1119-24
pubmed: 19213931
J Sports Sci. 2015;33(14):1472-9
pubmed: 25555163
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 11;12(1):e0166299
pubmed: 28076352
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2006 May;100(5):1460-6
pubmed: 16339340
ESC Heart Fail. 2018 Aug;5(4):586-591
pubmed: 29575708
Br J Sports Med. 1988 Dec;22(4):153-5
pubmed: 3228684
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002 Dec;34(12):1996-2001
pubmed: 12471307
Psychol Sport Exerc. 2008 May;9(3):231-245
pubmed: 18496608
J Sci Med Sport. 2017 Dec;20(12):1041-1046
pubmed: 28483555
Sports Med. 1999 Nov;28(5):337-74
pubmed: 10593646
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2020 Apr 1;128(4):914-924
pubmed: 32105522
Sports Med. 2019 Jan;49(1):95-108
pubmed: 30306467
J Strength Cond Res. 2019 May 24;:
pubmed: 31136546
J Sports Sci. 2002 Nov;20(11):873-99
pubmed: 12430990
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007 Aug;39(8):1423-34
pubmed: 17762377
J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2014 Oct;36(5):528-41
pubmed: 25356615
Physiol Rep. 2014 Nov 20;2(11):
pubmed: 25413320
Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9
pubmed: 19565683
Percept Mot Skills. 2018 Aug;125(4):788-801
pubmed: 29768966
Br J Sports Med. 2017 Jul;51(13):1003-1011
pubmed: 28259850