Reducing work pressure and IT problems and facilitating IT integration and audit & feedback help adherence to perioperative safety guidelines: a survey among 95 perioperative professionals.
Guideline adherence
Implementation
Implementation barriers
Implementation facilitators
Patient safety
Perioperative care
Journal
Implementation science communications
ISSN: 2662-2211
Titre abrégé: Implement Sci Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101764360
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
19
09
2019
accepted:
29
04
2020
entrez:
5
9
2020
pubmed:
5
9
2020
medline:
5
9
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To improve perioperative patient safety, guidelines for the preoperative, peroperative, and postoperative phase were introduced in the Netherlands between 2010 and 2013. To help the implementation of these guidelines, we aimed to get a better understanding of the barriers and drivers of perioperative guideline adherence and to explore what can be learned for future implementation projects in complex organizations. We developed a questionnaire survey based on the theoretical framework of Van Sluisveld et al. for classifying barriers and facilitators. The questionnaire contained 57 statements derived from (a) an instrument for measuring determinants of innovations by the Dutch Organization for Applied Scientific Research, (b) interviews with quality and safety policy officers and perioperative professionals, and (c) a publication of Cabana et al. The target group consisted of 232 perioperative professionals in nine hospitals. In addition to rating the statements on a five-point Likert scale (which were classified into the seven categories of the framework: factors relating to the intervention, society, implementation, organization, professional, patients, and social factors), respondents were invited to rank their three most important barriers in a separate, extra open-ended question. Ninety-five professionals (41%) completed the questionnaire. Fifteen statements (26%) were considered to be barriers, relating to social factors ( We identified a wide range of barriers that are believed to hinder the use of the perioperative safety guidelines, while an integrated information system and local data collection and feedback will also be necessary to engage perioperative teams. These barriers need to be locally prioritized and addressed by tailored implementation strategies. These results may also be of relevance for guideline implementation in general in complex organizations. Dutch Trial Registry: NTR3568.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
To improve perioperative patient safety, guidelines for the preoperative, peroperative, and postoperative phase were introduced in the Netherlands between 2010 and 2013. To help the implementation of these guidelines, we aimed to get a better understanding of the barriers and drivers of perioperative guideline adherence and to explore what can be learned for future implementation projects in complex organizations.
METHODS
METHODS
We developed a questionnaire survey based on the theoretical framework of Van Sluisveld et al. for classifying barriers and facilitators. The questionnaire contained 57 statements derived from (a) an instrument for measuring determinants of innovations by the Dutch Organization for Applied Scientific Research, (b) interviews with quality and safety policy officers and perioperative professionals, and (c) a publication of Cabana et al. The target group consisted of 232 perioperative professionals in nine hospitals. In addition to rating the statements on a five-point Likert scale (which were classified into the seven categories of the framework: factors relating to the intervention, society, implementation, organization, professional, patients, and social factors), respondents were invited to rank their three most important barriers in a separate, extra open-ended question.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Ninety-five professionals (41%) completed the questionnaire. Fifteen statements (26%) were considered to be barriers, relating to social factors (
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
We identified a wide range of barriers that are believed to hinder the use of the perioperative safety guidelines, while an integrated information system and local data collection and feedback will also be necessary to engage perioperative teams. These barriers need to be locally prioritized and addressed by tailored implementation strategies. These results may also be of relevance for guideline implementation in general in complex organizations.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
Dutch Trial Registry: NTR3568.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32885205
doi: 10.1186/s43058-020-00037-1
pii: 37
pmc: PMC7427904
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
49Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interestsThe authors have no competing interests to declare.
Références
Med J Aust. 2004 Mar 15;180(S6):S57-60
pubmed: 15012583
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005 Aug;49(7):898-901
pubmed: 16045646
BMJ. 1997 Aug 16;315(7105):418-21
pubmed: 9277610
N Engl J Med. 2010 Nov 11;363(20):1928-37
pubmed: 21067384
Med J Aust. 2002 Nov 4;177(9):502-6
pubmed: 12405894
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Apr 4;17(1):251
pubmed: 28376872
Implement Sci. 2013 Mar 23;8:35
pubmed: 23522377
Qual Health Care. 1995 Mar;4(1):55-64
pubmed: 10142039
Br J Anaesth. 2015 Jun;114(6):963-72
pubmed: 25673575
Lancet. 2003 Oct 11;362(9391):1225-30
pubmed: 14568747
N Engl J Med. 2003 Jun 26;348(26):2635-45
pubmed: 12826639
Ann Intern Med. 1994 Jun 1;120(11):956-63
pubmed: 8172440
Fam Pract. 2002 Feb;19(1):105-11
pubmed: 11818359
Implement Sci. 2009 Aug 12;4:54
pubmed: 19674440
Ann Surg. 2015 Jan;261(1):81-91
pubmed: 25072435
Surg Endosc. 2009 Apr;23(4):715-26
pubmed: 18636292
N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 29;360(5):491-9
pubmed: 19144931
Implement Sci. 2013 Jun 14;8:67
pubmed: 23767696
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Feb;21 Suppl 2:S14-20
pubmed: 16637955
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Dec;24(12):776-86
pubmed: 26199428
Health Serv Res. 2005 Feb;40(1):213-26
pubmed: 15663710
Am J Nurs. 2010 Apr;110(4):24-34; quiz 35-6
pubmed: 20335686
Ann Surg. 2012 Jan;255(1):44-9
pubmed: 22123159
BMC Fam Pract. 2011 Sep 22;12:98
pubmed: 21939542
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Sep;29(9):1593-9
pubmed: 20820013
Arch Surg. 2008 Jan;143(1):12-7; discussion 18
pubmed: 18209148
Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Jun;11(2):110-1
pubmed: 12448794
JAMA. 2001 Nov 28;286(20):2578-85
pubmed: 11722272
JAMA. 1999 Oct 20;282(15):1458-65
pubmed: 10535437
Am J Prev Med. 2001 Jan;20(1):61-7
pubmed: 11137777
Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Oct;18(5):385-92
pubmed: 19812102
Implement Sci. 2015 Jan 08;10:3
pubmed: 25567584
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2010 Nov-Dec;34(6):616-24
pubmed: 21097762
BMJ. 2010 Jan 13;340:b5433
pubmed: 20071413
Lancet. 1993 Nov 27;342(8883):1317-22
pubmed: 7901634
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Oct;14(5):340-6
pubmed: 16195567
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 Mar;56(3):332-8
pubmed: 22188135