Development and pilot testing of an adaptable protocol to address postpartum depression in pediatric practices serving lower-income and racial/ethnic minority families: contextual considerations.
Context
Disparities
Implementation
Pediatric practice
Postpartum depression
Screening
Journal
Implementation science communications
ISSN: 2662-2211
Titre abrégé: Implement Sci Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101764360
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
25
01
2020
accepted:
12
06
2020
entrez:
5
9
2020
pubmed:
5
9
2020
medline:
5
9
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Postpartum depression (PPD) affects approximately 25% of women in lower-income and racial/ethnic minority populations in the USA. Evidence-based interventions for PPD screening and treatment exist, but many women with PPD are not identified or are inadequately treated. To address this gap, the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends screening for PPD at routine preventive visits in the first 6 months of postpartum, but less than half of pediatricians do so. Small PPD screening studies have been conducted in pediatric practices serving average-risk women, but less is known about practices serving families with lower-income and/or racial/ethnic minority status (safety-net practices). Study objectives were (1) to develop and pilot test an adaptable PPD screening protocol in safety-net practices and (2) to test strategies for implementing the protocol. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used for this two-phase pilot study. Phase I focus groups with pediatric providers and staff in four safety-net practices informed phase II development and implementation of a PPD screening and referral protocol. Feasibility measures included the percentage of eligible women screened and documentation of follow-up plans in the electronic health record at 1-, 2-, 4-, and 6-month preventive visits over 3 months. Implementation strategies were assessed for acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility. Focus group participants felt that (1) addressing PPD in the pediatric setting is important, (2) all clinical team members should be engaged in screening, (3) workflows and competing interests may present barriers, and (4) commonly used screening tools/approaches may not adequately detect depression in the population studied. During protocol implementation, screening rates increased from 75 to 85% for 324 eligible preventive visits and documentation of follow-up plans increased from 66 to 87%. Only 6.5% of women screened positive (EPDS ≥ 10). Minor adaptations to implementation strategies were recommended to improve acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility. Although developing and implementing an adaptable protocol for PPD screening in safety-net pediatric practices using external facilitation and a bundle of implementation strategies appear feasible, low positive screen rates suggest adaptations to account for intersecting patient, practice, and external policy contexts are needed to improve PPD screening effectiveness in these practices.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Postpartum depression (PPD) affects approximately 25% of women in lower-income and racial/ethnic minority populations in the USA. Evidence-based interventions for PPD screening and treatment exist, but many women with PPD are not identified or are inadequately treated. To address this gap, the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends screening for PPD at routine preventive visits in the first 6 months of postpartum, but less than half of pediatricians do so. Small PPD screening studies have been conducted in pediatric practices serving average-risk women, but less is known about practices serving families with lower-income and/or racial/ethnic minority status (safety-net practices). Study objectives were (1) to develop and pilot test an adaptable PPD screening protocol in safety-net practices and (2) to test strategies for implementing the protocol.
METHODS
METHODS
The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used for this two-phase pilot study. Phase I focus groups with pediatric providers and staff in four safety-net practices informed phase II development and implementation of a PPD screening and referral protocol. Feasibility measures included the percentage of eligible women screened and documentation of follow-up plans in the electronic health record at 1-, 2-, 4-, and 6-month preventive visits over 3 months. Implementation strategies were assessed for acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Focus group participants felt that (1) addressing PPD in the pediatric setting is important, (2) all clinical team members should be engaged in screening, (3) workflows and competing interests may present barriers, and (4) commonly used screening tools/approaches may not adequately detect depression in the population studied. During protocol implementation, screening rates increased from 75 to 85% for 324 eligible preventive visits and documentation of follow-up plans increased from 66 to 87%. Only 6.5% of women screened positive (EPDS ≥ 10). Minor adaptations to implementation strategies were recommended to improve acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Although developing and implementing an adaptable protocol for PPD screening in safety-net pediatric practices using external facilitation and a bundle of implementation strategies appear feasible, low positive screen rates suggest adaptations to account for intersecting patient, practice, and external policy contexts are needed to improve PPD screening effectiveness in these practices.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32885220
doi: 10.1186/s43058-020-00049-x
pii: 49
pmc: PMC7427956
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
66Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interestsDr. Byatt has served on advisory boards for Sage Therapeutics and as a speaker for Sage Therapeutics. She has served as a consultant for Sage Therapeutics and Ovia Health and has received honoraria from Miller Medical Communications and WebMD/Medscape. Dr. Byatt is also the statewide Medical Director of the Massachusetts Child Psychiatry Access Program (MCPAP) for Moms and thus has received salary and/or funding support from the Massachusetts Department of Mental Health.
Références
Pediatrics. 2017 Apr;139(4):
pubmed: 28213605
J Pediatr Health Care. 2017 Mar - Apr;31(2):178-183
pubmed: 27614814
Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jun;105(6):1442-50
pubmed: 15932842
Depress Anxiety. 2017 Oct;34(10):928-966
pubmed: 28962068
J Pediatr Health Care. 2019 Jul - Aug;33(4):e19-e27
pubmed: 31227124
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2017 Sep;72(9):553-568
pubmed: 28905985
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2016 Apr;25(4):381-90
pubmed: 26579952
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2001 Oct;104(4):243-9
pubmed: 11722298
Pediatrics. 2010 Nov;126(5):1032-9
pubmed: 20974776
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2015;11:99-137
pubmed: 25822344
Matern Child Health J. 2019 Oct;23(10):1292-1298
pubmed: 31222600
Lancet Psychiatry. 2017 Jun;4(6):477-485
pubmed: 28476427
Psychiatr Serv. 2011 Jun;62(6):619-25
pubmed: 21632730
JAMA. 2016 Jan 26;315(4):388-406
pubmed: 26813212
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2009 May;119(5):350-64
pubmed: 19298573
Mayo Clin Proc. 2014 Jun;89(6):835-44
pubmed: 24943697
Soc Work Public Health. 2011;26(1):78-95
pubmed: 21213189
J Am Board Fam Med. 2007 May-Jun;20(3):280-8
pubmed: 17478661
Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88
pubmed: 16204405
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2013;9:379-407
pubmed: 23394227
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2016 Feb;19(1):187-91
pubmed: 25846018
Implement Sci. 2009 Aug 07;4:50
pubmed: 19664226
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2017 Sep;26(9):966-975
pubmed: 28409703
Int J Womens Health. 2010 Dec 30;3:1-14
pubmed: 21339932
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2017 Dec;20(6):789-790
pubmed: 29101480
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Nov;126(5):1048-58
pubmed: 26444130
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2017 Apr;20(2):345-354
pubmed: 28078472
JAMA. 2016 Jan 26;315(4):380-7
pubmed: 26813211
Br J Psychiatry. 1987 Jun;150:782-6
pubmed: 3651732
Pediatrics. 2010 Mar;125(3):e609-17
pubmed: 20156899
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011 Mar;38(2):65-76
pubmed: 20957426
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2013 Oct;16(5):429-32
pubmed: 23812739
Implement Sci. 2015 Feb 12;10:21
pubmed: 25889199
Br J Gen Pract. 2011 Apr;61(585):256-62
pubmed: 21439184