Strategic Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Serology Testing in a Low Prevalence Setting: The COVID-19 Contact (CoCo) Study in Healthcare Professionals.
COVID-19
Coronavirus
Healthcare professionals
Humoral immunity
Infection
Pandemic
SARS-CoV-2
Serological testing
Virus
Journal
Infectious diseases and therapy
ISSN: 2193-8229
Titre abrégé: Infect Dis Ther
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101634499
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Dec 2020
Historique:
received:
31
07
2020
pubmed:
5
9
2020
medline:
5
9
2020
entrez:
5
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Serology testing is explored for epidemiological research and to inform individuals after suspected infection. During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, frontline healthcare professionals (HCP) may be at particular risk for infection. No longitudinal data on functional seroconversion in HCP in regions with low COVID-19 prevalence and low pre-test probability exist. In a large German university hospital, we performed weekly questionnaire assessments and anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) immunoglobulin G (IgG) measurements with various commercial tests, a novel surrogate virus neutralisation test, and a neutralisation assay using live SARS-CoV-2. From baseline to week 6, 1080 screening measurements for anti-SARS CoV-2 (S1) IgG from 217 frontline HCP (65% female) were performed. Overall, 75.6% of HCP reported at least one symptom of respiratory infection. Self-perceived infection probability declined over time (from mean 20.1% at baseline to 12.4% in week 6, p < 0.001). In sera of convalescent patients with PCR-confirmed COVID-19, we measured high anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels, obtained highly concordant results from enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) using e.g. the spike 1 (S1) protein domain and the nucleocapsid protein (NCP) as targets, and confirmed antiviral neutralisation. However, in HCP the cumulative incidence for anti-SARS-CoV-2 (S1) IgG was 1.86% for positive and 0.93% for equivocal positive results over the study period of 6 weeks. Except for one HCP, none of the eight initial positive results were confirmed by alternative serology tests or showed in vitro neutralisation against live SARS-CoV-2. The only true seroconversion occurred without symptoms and mounted strong functional humoral immunity. Thus, the confirmed cumulative incidence for neutralizing anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG was 0.47%. When assessing anti-SARS-CoV-2 immune status in individuals with low pre-test probability, we suggest confirming positive results from single measurements by alternative serology tests or functional assays. Our data highlight the need for a methodical serology screening approach in regions with low SARS-CoV-2 infection rates. The study is registered at DRKS00021152.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Serology testing is explored for epidemiological research and to inform individuals after suspected infection. During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, frontline healthcare professionals (HCP) may be at particular risk for infection. No longitudinal data on functional seroconversion in HCP in regions with low COVID-19 prevalence and low pre-test probability exist.
METHODS
METHODS
In a large German university hospital, we performed weekly questionnaire assessments and anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) immunoglobulin G (IgG) measurements with various commercial tests, a novel surrogate virus neutralisation test, and a neutralisation assay using live SARS-CoV-2.
RESULTS
RESULTS
From baseline to week 6, 1080 screening measurements for anti-SARS CoV-2 (S1) IgG from 217 frontline HCP (65% female) were performed. Overall, 75.6% of HCP reported at least one symptom of respiratory infection. Self-perceived infection probability declined over time (from mean 20.1% at baseline to 12.4% in week 6, p < 0.001). In sera of convalescent patients with PCR-confirmed COVID-19, we measured high anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels, obtained highly concordant results from enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) using e.g. the spike 1 (S1) protein domain and the nucleocapsid protein (NCP) as targets, and confirmed antiviral neutralisation. However, in HCP the cumulative incidence for anti-SARS-CoV-2 (S1) IgG was 1.86% for positive and 0.93% for equivocal positive results over the study period of 6 weeks. Except for one HCP, none of the eight initial positive results were confirmed by alternative serology tests or showed in vitro neutralisation against live SARS-CoV-2. The only true seroconversion occurred without symptoms and mounted strong functional humoral immunity. Thus, the confirmed cumulative incidence for neutralizing anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG was 0.47%.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
When assessing anti-SARS-CoV-2 immune status in individuals with low pre-test probability, we suggest confirming positive results from single measurements by alternative serology tests or functional assays. Our data highlight the need for a methodical serology screening approach in regions with low SARS-CoV-2 infection rates.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
The study is registered at DRKS00021152.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32886335
doi: 10.1007/s40121-020-00334-1
pii: 10.1007/s40121-020-00334-1
pmc: PMC7472691
doi:
Banques de données
DRKS
['DRKS00021152']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
837-849Subventions
Organisme : Novartis Pharma
ID : MAIN457A-FVKH012
Organisme : Deutsches Zentrum für Infektionsforschung
ID : Infrastrukturförderung
Organisme : Pari
ID : Grant
Organisme : Verein Kinderherz Hannover
ID : Grant
Références
Rosenbaum L. Facing Covid-19 in Italy—ethics, logistics, and therapeutics on the epidemic’s front line. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(20):1873–5.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2005492
Houlihan NVC, Byrne T, Lewer D, et al. SARS-CoV-2 virus and antibodies in front-line health care workers in an acute hospital in London: preliminary results from a longitudinal study. 2020. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/101101/2020060820120584v1article-info . Accessed 31 July 2020.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Cluster of severe acute respiratory syndrome cases among protected health-care workers—Toronto, Canada, April 2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2003;52(19):433–6.
Memish ZA, Zumla AI, Assiri A. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus infections in health care workers. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(9):884–6.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1308698
Treibel TA, Manisty C, Burton M, et al. COVID-19: PCR screening of asymptomatic health-care workers at London hospital. Lancet. 2020;395(10237):1608–10.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31100-4
Kimball A, Hatfield KM, Arons M, et al. Asymptomatic and presymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections in residents of a long-term care skilled nursing facility—King County, Washington, March 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(13):377–81.
doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6913e1
Mizumoto K, Kagaya K, Zarebski A, Chowell G. Estimating the asymptomatic proportion of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases on board the Diamond Princess cruise ship, Yokohama, Japan, 2020. Euro Surveill. 2020;25(10):2000180.
doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.10.2000180
Steensels D, Oris E, Coninx L, et al. Hospital-wide SARS-CoV-2 antibody screening in 3056 staff in a tertiary center in Belgium. JAMA. 2020;324:195–7.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.11160
Pan A, Liu L, Wang C, et al. Association of public health interventions with the epidemiology of the COVID-19 outbreak in Wuhan, China. JAMA. 2020;323:1–9.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.6130
Folgueira M-RM, Alonso-Lopez M, et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection in Health Care Workers in a large public hospital in Madrid, during March 2020. 2020. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/101101/2020040720055723v2 . Accessed 7 July 2020.
Long QX, Liu BZ, Deng HJ, et al. Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19. Nat Med. 2020;26(6):845–8.
doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0897-1
Cheng MP, Yansouni CP, Basta NE, et al. Serodiagnostics for severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus-2: a narrative review. Ann Intern Med. 2020. https://doi.org/10.7326/M20-2854 .
Behrens GMN, Cossmann A, Stankov MV, et al. Perceived versus proven SARS-CoV-2-specific immune responses in health-care professionals. Infection. 2020;48:631–4.
doi: 10.1007/s15010-020-01461-0
Robbiani DF, Gaebler C, Muecksch F, et al. Convergent antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in convalescent individuals. Nature. 2020;584:437–42.
doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2456-9
Sethuraman N, Jeremiah SS, Ryo A. Interpreting diagnostic tests for SARS-CoV-2. JAMA. 2020;323(22):2249–51.
RKI. COVID-19 in Germany. 2020. https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/InfAZ/N/Neuartiges_Coronavirus/Fallzahlen.html . Accessed 31 July 2020.
Streeck H SB, Kuemmerer B, et al. Infection fatality rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection in a German community with a super-spreading event. 2020. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/101101/2020050420090076v2 . Accessed 7 July 2020.
Bošnjak B SS, Willenzon S, et al. Low levels of neutralizing anti-SARS-CoV-2-S antibodies in sera of convalescent COVID-19 patients with mild clinical symptoms. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.12.20151407 .
Lai J, Ma S, Wang Y, et al. Factors associated with mental health outcomes among health care workers exposed to coronavirus disease 2019. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(3):e203976.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3976
Day M. Covid-19: four fifths of cases are asymptomatic, China figures indicate. BMJ. 2020;369:m1375.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1375
Sutton D, Fuchs K, D’Alton M, Goffman D. Universal screening for SARS-CoV-2 in women admitted for delivery. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(22):2163–4.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2009316
Bai Y, Yao L, Wei T, et al. Presumed asymptomatic carrier transmission of COVID-19. JAMA. 2020;323:1406–7.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.2565
Buonsenso D, Zampino G, Valentini P. Novel coronavirus disease 2019 infection in children: the dark side of a worldwide outbreak. Front Pediatr. 2020;8:215.
doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.00215
Weinstein MC, Freedberg KA, Hyle EP, Paltiel AD. Waiting for certainty on Covid-19 antibody tests—at what cost? N Engl J Med. 2020;383(6):e37.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2017739
CDC. Interim guidelines for COVID-19 antibody testing. 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/lab/resources/antibody-tests-guidelineshtml . Accessed 31 July 2020.
Sheehan MC, Fox MA. Early warnings: the lessons of COVID-19 for public health climate preparedness. Int J Health Serv. 2020;50(3):264–70.
doi: 10.1177/0020731420928971
Bressan S, Buonsenso D, Farrugia R, et al. Preparedness and response to pediatric CoVID-19 in European emergency departments: a survey of the REPEM and PERUKI networks. Ann Emerg Med. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.05.018 .
Paffenholz P, Peine A, Hellmich M, et al. Perception of the 2020 SARS-CoV-2 pandemic among medical professionals in Germany: results from a nationwide online survey. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020;9:1590–9.
doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1785951
Folgueira MD, Alonso-Lopez MA, Delgado R. SARS-CoV-2 infection in health care workers in a large public hospital in Madrid, Spain, during March 2020. 2020. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/101101/2020040720055723v2 . Accessed 31 July 2020.
Garcia-Basteiro AL, Moncunill G, Tortajada M, et al. Seroprevalence of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 among health care workers in a large Spanish reference hospital. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):3500.
Black JRM, Bailey C, Przewrocka J, Dijkstra KK, Swanton C. COVID-19: the case for health-care worker screening to prevent hospital transmission. Lancet. 2020;395(10234):1418–20.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30917-X
Watson J, Whiting PF, Brush JE. Interpreting a covid-19 test result. BMJ. 2020;369:m1808.
Tostmann A, Bradley J, Bousema T, et al. Strong associations and moderate predictive value of early symptoms for SARS-CoV-2 test positivity among healthcare workers, the Netherlands, March 2020. Euro Surveill. 2020;25(16):2000508.
doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.16.2000508
Lan FY, Filler R, Mathew S, et al. COVID-19 symptoms predictive of healthcare workers’ SARS-CoV-2 PCR results. PLoS One. 2020;15(6):e0235460.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235460
Feldstein LR, Rose EB, Horwitz SM, et al. Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in US children and adolescents. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(4):334–46.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2021680
Wolfel R, Corman VM, Guggemos W, et al. Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID-2019. Nature. 2020;581(7809):465–9.
doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2196-x
Braun J, Loyal L, Frentsch M, et al. SARS-CoV-2-reactive T cells in healthy donors and patients with COVID-19. Nature. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2598-9 .
Mateus J, Grifoni A, Tarke A, et al. Selective and cross-reactive SARS-CoV-2 T cell epitopes in unexposed humans. Science. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abd3871 .