The management of clival chordomas: an Italian multicentric study.

chordomas clivus endoscopic endonasal approach multicentric oncology radiotherapy skull base surgery

Journal

Journal of neurosurgery
ISSN: 1933-0693
Titre abrégé: J Neurosurg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0253357

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 Sep 2020
Historique:
received: 24 03 2020
accepted: 20 05 2020
medline: 5 9 2020
pubmed: 5 9 2020
entrez: 4 9 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

In the last 2 decades, the endoscopic endonasal approach in the treatment of clival chordomas has evolved to be a viable strategy to achieve maximal safe resection of this tumor. Here, the authors present a multicentric national study, intending to analyze the evolution of this approach over a 20-year time frame and its contribution in the treatment of clival chordomas. Clival chordoma cases surgically treated between 1999 and 2018 at 10 Italian neurosurgical departments were included in this retrospective study. Clinical, radiological, and surgical findings, adjuvant therapy, and outcomes were evaluated and compared according to classification in the treatment eras from 1999 to 2008 and from 2009 to 2018. One hundred eighty-two surgical procedures were reviewed, with an increase in case load since 2009. The endoscopic endonasal transclival approach (EETA) was performed in 151 of 182 cases (83.0%) and other approaches were performed in 31 cases (17%). There was an increment in the use of EETA, neuronavigation, and Doppler ultrasound after 2008. The overall postoperative complication rate was 14.3% (26 of 182 cases) consisting of 9 CSF leaks (4.9%), 7 intracranial hemorrhages (3.8%), 5 cases of meningitis (2.7%), and 5 cerebral ischemic injuries (2.7%). Gross-total resection (GTR) was achieved in 93 of 182 cases (51.1%). Extent of resection (EOR) improved in the second era of the study. Signs and/or symptoms at presentation worsened in 27 cases (14.8%), and the Katz Index worsened in 10 cases (5.5%). Previous treatment, dural involvement, EETA, and intraoperative Doppler ultrasound correlated with GTR. Patients received adjuvant proton beam radiation in 115 of 182 cases (63.2%), which was administered more in the latter era. Five-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 62.3% and 73.5%, respectively. GTR, EETA, proton beam therapy, and the chondroid subtype correlated with a better survival rate. The mean follow-up was 62 months. Through multicentric data collection, this study encompasses the largest series in the literature of clival chordomas surgically treated through an EETA. An increase in the use of this approach was found among Italian neurosurgical departments together with an improved extent of resection over time. The satisfactory rate of GTR was marked by low surgical morbidity and the preservation of patient quality of life. Surgical outcome was reinforced, in terms of PFS and OS, by the use of proton beam therapy, which was increasingly performed along the period of study.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32886913
doi: 10.3171/2020.5.JNS20925
pii: 2020.5.JNS20925
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

93-102

Auteurs

Luigi Maria Cavallo (LM)

1Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Division of Neurosurgery, University of Napoli "Federico II", Naples.

Diego Mazzatenta (D)

2Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences of Bologna, "Bellaria" Hospital, Bologna.

Elena d'Avella (E)

1Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Division of Neurosurgery, University of Napoli "Federico II", Naples.

Domenico Catapano (D)

3Division of Neurosurgery, IRCCS "Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza", San Giovanni Rotondo.

Marco Maria Fontanella (MM)

4Division of Neurosurgery, Università degli Studi di Brescia-Spedali Civili, Brescia.

Davide Locatelli (D)

5Division of Neurosurgery, Università degli Studi dell'Insubria, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, Varese.

Davide Luglietto (D)

6Division of Neurosurgery, AOU Senese "Le Scotte", Siena.

Davide Milani (D)

7Division of Neurosurgery, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano.

Domenico Solari (D)

1Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Division of Neurosurgery, University of Napoli "Federico II", Naples.

Marco Vindigni (M)

8Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, Udine.

Francesco Zenga (F)

9Department of Neuroscience, "Rita Levi Montalcini", Neurosurgery Unit, University of Turin; and.

Gianluigi Zona (G)

10Neurosurgery and Neurotraumatology, San Martino Policlinico Hospital, IRCCS for Oncology and Neurosciences, Genoa, Italy.

Paolo Cappabianca (P)

1Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Division of Neurosurgery, University of Napoli "Federico II", Naples.

Classifications MeSH