Professional roles of general practitioners, community pharmacists and specialist providers in collaborative medication deprescribing - a qualitative study.

Deprescriptions General practice Intersectoral collaboration Medication therapy management, Medication optimization, Qualitative research. Multimorbidity Polypharmacy

Journal

BMC family practice
ISSN: 1471-2296
Titre abrégé: BMC Fam Pract
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967792

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 09 2020
Historique:
received: 31 03 2020
accepted: 27 08 2020
entrez: 5 9 2020
pubmed: 6 9 2020
medline: 25 9 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Collaborative care approaches between general practitioners (GPs) and pharmacists have received international recognition for medication optimization and deprescribing efforts. Although specialist providers have been shown to influence deprescribing, their profession so far remains omitted from collaborative care approaches for medication optimization. Similarly, while explorative studies on role perception and collaboration between GPs and pharmacists grow, interaction with specialists for medication optimization is neglected. Our qualitative study therefore aims to explore GPs', community pharmacists' and specialist providers' role perceptions of deprescribing, and to identify interpersonal as well as structural factors that may influence collaborative medication optimization approaches. Seven focus-group discussions with GPs, community pharmacists and community specialists were conducted in Hesse and Lower Saxony, Germany. The topic guide focused on views and experiences with deprescribing with special attention to inter-professional collaboration. We conducted conventional content analysis and conceptualized emerging themes using the Theoretical Domains Framework. Twenty-six GPs, four community pharmacists and three community specialists took part in the study. The main themes corresponded to the four domains 'Social/professional role and identity' (1), 'Social influences' (2), 'Reinforcement' (3) and ´Environmental context and resources' (4) which were further described by beliefs statements, that is inductively developed key messages. For (1), GPs emerged as central medication managers while pharmacists and specialists were assigned confined or subordinated tasks in deprescribing. Social influences (2) encompassed patients' trust in GPs as a support, while specialists and pharmacists were believed to threaten GPs' role and deprescribing attempts. Reinforcements (3) negatively affected GPs' and pharmacists' effort in medication optimization by social reprimand and lacking reward. Environmental context (4) impeded deprescribing efforts by deficient reimbursement and resources as well as fragmentation of care, while informational and gate-keeping resources remained underutilized. Understanding stakeholders' role perceptions on collaborative deprescribing is a prerequisite for joint approaches to medication management. We found that clear definition and dissemination of roles and responsibilities are premise for avoiding intergroup conflicts. Role performance and collaboration must further be supported by structural factors like adequate reimbursement, resources and a transparent continuity of care.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Collaborative care approaches between general practitioners (GPs) and pharmacists have received international recognition for medication optimization and deprescribing efforts. Although specialist providers have been shown to influence deprescribing, their profession so far remains omitted from collaborative care approaches for medication optimization. Similarly, while explorative studies on role perception and collaboration between GPs and pharmacists grow, interaction with specialists for medication optimization is neglected. Our qualitative study therefore aims to explore GPs', community pharmacists' and specialist providers' role perceptions of deprescribing, and to identify interpersonal as well as structural factors that may influence collaborative medication optimization approaches.
METHOD
Seven focus-group discussions with GPs, community pharmacists and community specialists were conducted in Hesse and Lower Saxony, Germany. The topic guide focused on views and experiences with deprescribing with special attention to inter-professional collaboration. We conducted conventional content analysis and conceptualized emerging themes using the Theoretical Domains Framework.
RESULTS
Twenty-six GPs, four community pharmacists and three community specialists took part in the study. The main themes corresponded to the four domains 'Social/professional role and identity' (1), 'Social influences' (2), 'Reinforcement' (3) and ´Environmental context and resources' (4) which were further described by beliefs statements, that is inductively developed key messages. For (1), GPs emerged as central medication managers while pharmacists and specialists were assigned confined or subordinated tasks in deprescribing. Social influences (2) encompassed patients' trust in GPs as a support, while specialists and pharmacists were believed to threaten GPs' role and deprescribing attempts. Reinforcements (3) negatively affected GPs' and pharmacists' effort in medication optimization by social reprimand and lacking reward. Environmental context (4) impeded deprescribing efforts by deficient reimbursement and resources as well as fragmentation of care, while informational and gate-keeping resources remained underutilized.
CONCLUSION
Understanding stakeholders' role perceptions on collaborative deprescribing is a prerequisite for joint approaches to medication management. We found that clear definition and dissemination of roles and responsibilities are premise for avoiding intergroup conflicts. Role performance and collaboration must further be supported by structural factors like adequate reimbursement, resources and a transparent continuity of care.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32887551
doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01255-1
pii: 10.1186/s12875-020-01255-1
pmc: PMC7487755
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

183

Subventions

Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
ID : DO 513/11-1, JU 2992/2-1
Pays : International

Références

Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2016 Sep 23;113(38):627-633
pubmed: 27743469
J Interprof Care. 2005 May;19 Suppl 1:116-31
pubmed: 16096150
Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88
pubmed: 16204405
Implement Sci. 2012 Sep 21;7:93
pubmed: 22999460
J Eval Clin Pract. 2010 Feb;16(1):69-75
pubmed: 20367817
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2016 Nov 4;113(43):739-740
pubmed: 27890049
BMJ Open. 2014 Dec 08;4(12):e006544
pubmed: 25488097
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 07;10(4):e0122246
pubmed: 25849568
Qual Health Res. 2017 Nov;27(13):1936-1947
pubmed: 29088989
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2014;108(1):66-77
pubmed: 24602535
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Jun;83(6):913-7
pubmed: 18388882
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 May;175(5):827-34
pubmed: 25798731
Br J Gen Pract. 2010 Jul;60(576):285-94
pubmed: 20594430
BMC Fam Pract. 2019 Feb 8;20(1):26
pubmed: 30736732
Praxis (Bern 1994). 2013 Jan 2;102(1):21-7
pubmed: 23384927
Fam Pract. 2018 Mar 27;35(2):120-121
pubmed: 29420724
BMJ. 2015 Jan 20;350:h176
pubmed: 25646760
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Mar 21;17(1):224
pubmed: 28327136
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2015 Sep-Oct;11(5):602-22
pubmed: 25640887
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Feb 13;19(1):118
pubmed: 30760276
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Jul;86(7):1251-1266
pubmed: 32216066
Br J Gen Pract. 2018 Oct;68(675):e735-e742
pubmed: 30249610
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Jan;67(1):115-118
pubmed: 30300947
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2012 Dec;19(10):853-9
pubmed: 22296565
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2018 Mar;14(3):228-240
pubmed: 28506574
Implement Sci. 2017 Jun 21;12(1):77
pubmed: 28637486
Ann Pharmacother. 2016 Aug;50(8):625-36
pubmed: 27257284
J Clin Pharm Ther. 1995 Aug;20(4):199-205
pubmed: 8557783
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Oct;78(4):738-47
pubmed: 24661192
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Sep 26;69(687):e665-e674
pubmed: 31455642
Drugs Aging. 2016 Apr;33(4):249-66
pubmed: 26915076
Br J Health Psychol. 2009 Nov;14(Pt 4):625-46
pubmed: 19159506
BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Jul 09;13:56
pubmed: 22697490
Drugs Aging. 2019 Apr;36(4):371-378
pubmed: 30671871
BMJ. 2019 Feb 7;364:l570
pubmed: 30733211
Fam Pract. 1997 Oct;14(5):361-8
pubmed: 9472369
Drugs Aging. 2013 Oct;30(10):793-807
pubmed: 23912674
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Mar;13(3):233-245
pubmed: 32056451
BMJ. 2005 Oct 22;331(7522):935
pubmed: 16093254
Sante Publique. 2013 May-Jun;25(3):331-41
pubmed: 24007909

Auteurs

Navina Gerlach (N)

Department of General Practice, University of Marburg, Karl-von-Frisch-Straße 4, D-35043, Marburg, Germany. navina.gerlach@staff.uni-marburg.de.

Matthias Michiels-Corsten (M)

Department of General Practice, University of Marburg, Karl-von-Frisch-Straße 4, D-35043, Marburg, Germany.

Annika Viniol (A)

Department of General Practice, University of Marburg, Karl-von-Frisch-Straße 4, D-35043, Marburg, Germany.

Tanja Schleef (T)

Hannover Medical School, Institute of General Practice, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, D-30625, Hannover, Germany.

Ulrike Junius-Walker (U)

Hannover Medical School, Institute of General Practice, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, D-30625, Hannover, Germany.

Olaf Krause (O)

Hannover Medical School, Institute of General Practice, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, D-30625, Hannover, Germany.

Norbert Donner-Banzhoff (N)

Department of General Practice, University of Marburg, Karl-von-Frisch-Straße 4, D-35043, Marburg, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH