Exploring feedback from research nurses in relation to the design and conduct of a randomised controlled trial of wound care treatments: A sequential, dependent, mixed-methods study.


Journal

Journal of tissue viability
ISSN: 0965-206X
Titre abrégé: J Tissue Viability
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9306822

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2020
Historique:
received: 28 10 2019
revised: 04 06 2020
accepted: 27 07 2020
pubmed: 6 9 2020
medline: 17 8 2021
entrez: 5 9 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Research nurse involvement in trials is crucial to successful conduct, however their feedback on trial design and conduct is not necessarily always collected and shared. This study was designed to explore research nurse feedback in relation to study and protocol design and implementation in the National Institute for Health Research Programme Grants for Applied Research funded Surgical Wounds Healing by Secondary Intention pilot and feasibility trial (SWHSI). The primary aim of this study was to inform the design and conduct of a proposed future, larger study in this area. Given the evidence gap, it was deemed prudent to share these findings for the benefit of others. A sequential, dependent mixed methods study, comprising a Likert scale questionnaire and semi-structured interviews, explored the experiences, in relation to study design and conduct, of research nurses involved in the trial. Of the 10 research nurses involved in the trial, eight nurses completed a questionnaire and were interviewed. Questionnaire data was analysed using descriptive statistics and interview data using thematic analysis. A range of questionnaire responses were provided, however at least 50% (n = 4) of respondents indicated that they were happy with both the study design and conduct. Interview data identified key themes to consider when involving research nurses in the design, delivery and conduct of RCTs; removing barriers to recruitment, time management, engagement strategies and resource provision. Engagement of research nurses is important to enable effective trial conduct. Research teams should therefore consider how best to obtain and include input from all members of the research team from the outset. Furthermore, the sharing of feedback on research design and conduct, from the perspective of research nurses delivering trial recruitment and retention, remains crucial to effective and efficient trial conduct. Clinical Trial Registry: ISRCTN12761776. Date of registration: 10th December 2015.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Research nurse involvement in trials is crucial to successful conduct, however their feedback on trial design and conduct is not necessarily always collected and shared. This study was designed to explore research nurse feedback in relation to study and protocol design and implementation in the National Institute for Health Research Programme Grants for Applied Research funded Surgical Wounds Healing by Secondary Intention pilot and feasibility trial (SWHSI). The primary aim of this study was to inform the design and conduct of a proposed future, larger study in this area. Given the evidence gap, it was deemed prudent to share these findings for the benefit of others.
METHODS METHODS
A sequential, dependent mixed methods study, comprising a Likert scale questionnaire and semi-structured interviews, explored the experiences, in relation to study design and conduct, of research nurses involved in the trial. Of the 10 research nurses involved in the trial, eight nurses completed a questionnaire and were interviewed. Questionnaire data was analysed using descriptive statistics and interview data using thematic analysis.
RESULTS RESULTS
A range of questionnaire responses were provided, however at least 50% (n = 4) of respondents indicated that they were happy with both the study design and conduct. Interview data identified key themes to consider when involving research nurses in the design, delivery and conduct of RCTs; removing barriers to recruitment, time management, engagement strategies and resource provision.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Engagement of research nurses is important to enable effective trial conduct. Research teams should therefore consider how best to obtain and include input from all members of the research team from the outset. Furthermore, the sharing of feedback on research design and conduct, from the perspective of research nurses delivering trial recruitment and retention, remains crucial to effective and efficient trial conduct.
TRIAL REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
Clinical Trial Registry: ISRCTN12761776. Date of registration: 10th December 2015.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32888791
pii: S0965-206X(20)30108-X
doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2020.07.007
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

342-347

Subventions

Organisme : Department of Health
ID : RP-PG-0609-10171
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Judith Long (J)

Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Anlaby Road, Hull, UK. Electronic address: Judith.long@hey.nhs.uk.

Keira Meethan (K)

Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James' Hospital, Leeds, UK. Electronic address: keira.meethan@nhs.net.

Catherine Arundel (C)

York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK. Electronic address: Catherine.arundel@york.ac.uk.

Emma Clarke (E)

Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Anlaby Road, Hull, UK. Electronic address: emma.clarke28@nhs.net.

Anna Firth (A)

Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Anlaby Road, Hull, UK. Electronic address: anna.firth@hey.nhs.uk.

Martin Sylvester (M)

Leeds Community Healthcare NHS Trust, St Marys Hospital, Leeds, UK. Electronic address: msylvester@nhs.uk.

Ian Chetter (I)

Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Anlaby Road, Hull, UK; Hull York Medical School, Allam Medical Building, University of Hull, Hull, UK. Electronic address: ian.chetter@hey.nhs.uk.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH